This PR ensures that only conversations from quick conversation channels
are resolved, avoiding resolutions on the email channel (we still need
to improve the UX here). It also updates the FAQ generation logic,
limiting it to conversations that had at least one human interaction.
This PR introduces several improvements to the Captain AI dashboard
section:
- New billing page, with new colors, layout and meters for Captain usage
- Updated the base paywall component to use new colors
- Updated PageLayout.vue, it's more generic and can be used for other
pages as well
- Use flags to toggle empty state and loading state
- Add prop for `featureFlag` to show the paywall slot based on feature
enabled on account
- Update `useAccount` to add a `isCloudFeatureEnabled`
- **Removed feature flag checks from captain route definitions**, so the
captain entry will always be visible on the sidebar
- Add banner to Captain pages for the following cases
- Responses usage is over 80%
- Documents limit is fully exhausted
### Screenshots
<details><summary>Free plan</summary>
<p>


</p>
</details>
<details><summary>Paid plan</summary>
<p>


</p>
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
- Fixed Firecrawl webhook payloads to ensure proper data handling and
delivery.
- Removed unused Robin AI code to improve codebase cleanliness and
maintainability.
- Implement authentication for the Firecrawl endpoint to improve
security. A key is generated to secure the webhook URLs from FireCrawl.
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
This pull request introduces several changes to implement and manage
usage limits for the Captain AI service. The key changes include adding
configuration for plan limits, updating error messages, modifying
controllers and models to handle usage limits, and updating tests to
ensure the new functionality works correctly.
## Implementation Checklist
- [x] Ability to configure captain limits per check
- [x] Update response for `usage_limits` to include captain limits
- [x] Methods to increment or reset captain responses limits in the
`limits` column for the `Account` model
- [x] Check documents limit using a count query
- [x] Ensure Captain hand-off if a limit is reached
- [x] Ensure limits are enforced for Copilot Chat
- [x] Ensure limits are reset when stripe webhook comes in
- [x] Increment usage for FAQ generation and Contact notes
- [x] Ensure documents limit is enforced
These changes ensure that the Captain AI service operates within the defined usage limits for different subscription plans, providing appropriate error messages and handling when limits are exceeded.
Currently, it’s unclear whether an FAQ item is generated from a
document, derived from a conversation, or added manually.
This PR resolves the issue by providing visibility into the source of
each FAQ. Users can now see whether an FAQ was generated or manually
added and, if applicable, by whom.
- Move the document_id to a polymorphic relation (documentable).
- Updated the APIs to accommodate the change.
- Update the service to add corresponding references.
- Updated the specs.
<img width="1007" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-15 at 11 27 56 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7d58f798-19c0-4407-b3e2-748a919d14af"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR introduces a review step for generated FAQs, allowing a human to
validate and approve them before use in customer interactions. While
hallucinations are minimal, this step ensures accurate and reliable FAQs
for Captain to use during LLM calls when responding to customers.
- Added a status field for the FAQ
- Allow the filter on the UI.
<img width="1072" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-15 at 6 39 26 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/81dfc038-31e9-40e6-8a09-586ebc4e8384"
/>
Migration Guide: https://chwt.app/v4/migration
This PR imports all the work related to Captain into the EE codebase. Captain represents the AI-based features in Chatwoot and includes the following key components:
- Assistant: An assistant has a persona, the product it would be trained on. At the moment, the data at which it is trained is from websites. Future integrations on Notion documents, PDF etc. This PR enables connecting an assistant to an inbox. The assistant would run the conversation every time before transferring it to an agent.
- Copilot for Agents: When an agent is supporting a customer, we will be able to offer additional help to lookup some data or fetch information from integrations etc via copilot.
- Conversation FAQ generator: When a conversation is resolved, the Captain integration would identify questions which were not in the knowledge base.
- CRM memory: Learns from the conversations and identifies important information about the contact.
---------
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <vishnu@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>

### Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the rubygems
dependencies of this project.
#### Snyk changed the following file(s):
- `Gemfile`
<details>
<summary>⚠️ <b>Warning</b></summary>
```
Failed to update the Gemfile.lock, please update manually before merging.
```
</details>
#### Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:
| | Issue | Score |
:-------------------------:|:-------------------------|:-------------------------
 | Web Cache Poisoning
<br/>[SNYK-RUBY-RACK-1061917](https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-RACK-1061917)
| **616**
---
> [!IMPORTANT]
>
> - Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with
your project.
> - Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since
the PR was raised.
> - This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a
real user.
---
**Note:** _You are seeing this because you or someone else with access
to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs._
For more information: <img
src="https://api.segment.io/v1/pixel/track?data=eyJ3cml0ZUtleSI6InJyWmxZcEdHY2RyTHZsb0lYd0dUcVg4WkFRTnNCOUEwIiwiYW5vbnltb3VzSWQiOiJhMWE2MzkzZS03ODdhLTRmYWItOGY1MS0zZjdmN2YzNzVlZDYiLCJldmVudCI6IlBSIHZpZXdlZCIsInByb3BlcnRpZXMiOnsicHJJZCI6ImExYTYzOTNlLTc4N2EtNGZhYi04ZjUxLTNmN2Y3ZjM3NWVkNiJ9fQ=="
width="0" height="0"/>
🧐 [View latest project
report](https://app.snyk.io/org/chatwoot/project/b7197bbd-6200-4f23-931d-c39928584360?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=fix-pr)
📜 [Customise PR
templates](https://docs.snyk.io/scan-using-snyk/pull-requests/snyk-fix-pull-or-merge-requests/customize-pr-templates)
🛠 [Adjust project
settings](https://app.snyk.io/org/chatwoot/project/b7197bbd-6200-4f23-931d-c39928584360?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=fix-pr/settings)
📚 [Read about Snyk's upgrade
logic](https://support.snyk.io/hc/en-us/articles/360003891078-Snyk-patches-to-fix-vulnerabilities)
---
**Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:**
🦉 [Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk
Learn.](https://learn.snyk.io/?loc=fix-pr)
[//]: #
'snyk:metadata:{"customTemplate":{"variablesUsed":[],"fieldsUsed":[]},"dependencies":[{"name":"rspec-rails","from":"6.1.4","to":"6.1.5"}],"env":"prod","issuesToFix":[{"exploit_maturity":"Proof
of
Concept","id":"SNYK-RUBY-RACK-1061917","priority_score":616,"priority_score_factors":[{"type":"exploit","label":"Proof
of
Concept","score":107},{"type":"fixability","label":true,"score":214},{"type":"cvssScore","label":"5.9","score":295},{"type":"scoreVersion","label":"v1","score":1}],"severity":"medium","title":"Web
Cache Poisoning"},{"exploit_maturity":"Proof of
Concept","id":"SNYK-RUBY-RACK-1061917","priority_score":616,"priority_score_factors":[{"type":"exploit","label":"Proof
of
Concept","score":107},{"type":"fixability","label":true,"score":214},{"type":"cvssScore","label":"5.9","score":295},{"type":"scoreVersion","label":"v1","score":1}],"severity":"medium","title":"Web
Cache Poisoning"},{"exploit_maturity":"Proof of
Concept","id":"SNYK-RUBY-RACK-1061917","priority_score":616,"priority_score_factors":[{"type":"exploit","label":"Proof
of
Concept","score":107},{"type":"fixability","label":true,"score":214},{"type":"cvssScore","label":"5.9","score":295},{"type":"scoreVersion","label":"v1","score":1}],"severity":"medium","title":"Web
Cache Poisoning"},{"exploit_maturity":"Proof of
Concept","id":"SNYK-RUBY-RACK-1061917","priority_score":616,"priority_score_factors":[{"type":"exploit","label":"Proof
of
Concept","score":107},{"type":"fixability","label":true,"score":214},{"type":"cvssScore","label":"5.9","score":295},{"type":"scoreVersion","label":"v1","score":1}],"severity":"medium","title":"Web
Cache
Poisoning"}],"prId":"a1a6393e-787a-4fab-8f51-3f7f7f375ed6","prPublicId":"a1a6393e-787a-4fab-8f51-3f7f7f375ed6","packageManager":"rubygems","priorityScoreList":[616],"projectPublicId":"b7197bbd-6200-4f23-931d-c39928584360","projectUrl":"https://app.snyk.io/org/chatwoot/project/b7197bbd-6200-4f23-931d-c39928584360?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=fix-pr","prType":"fix","templateFieldSources":{"branchName":"default","commitMessage":"default","description":"default","title":"default"},"templateVariants":["updated-fix-title","pr-warning-shown","priorityScore"],"type":"auto","upgrade":["SNYK-RUBY-RACK-1061917"],"vulns":["SNYK-RUBY-RACK-1061917"],"patch":[],"isBreakingChange":false,"remediationStrategy":"vuln"}'
---------
Co-authored-by: snyk-bot <snyk-bot@snyk.io>
The reload method in our callback was refreshing the object and hence the saved_change_to_assignee_id? Method wasn't working in the following callbacks.
This impacted the listeners subscribing to the event `ASSIGNEE_CHANGE`, `TEAM_CHANGE` etc
* feat: add push notification when SLA missed
* chore: sent notification only for inbox members
* feat: add conv particpants+admins to SLA notification list
* chore: add spec to ensure notification is created
* chore: refactor to multiple alerts for SLA conditions
* chore: add sla_policy as secondary_actor in notification
* chore: Move Pricing validation to on create
The previous validation was getting triggered on all transactions,
this would prevent login to existing users and session data need to be updated.
Opting for a less intrusive approach.
* chore: minore change
- Reorganizing installation config settings to move more configurations into UI from environment variables
- Changes to installation config to support premium plans in the enterprise edition
- Fixes the broken premium indicator in account/show and accounts/edit page
- We previously had this spec inside the enterprise folder which wouldn't be picked up by our build process, so moving to the correct folder instead.
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
This PR refactors the schema we introduced in #7518 based on the feedback from production tests. Here is the change log
- Decouple Inbox association to a new table inbox_response_sources -> this lets us share the same response source between multiple inboxes
- Add a status field to responses. This ensures that, by default, responses are created in pending status. You can do quality assurance before making them active. In future, this status can be leveraged by the bot to auto-generate response questions from conversations which require a handoff
- Add response_source association to responses and remove hard dependency from response_documents. This lets users write free-form question answers based on conversations, which doesn't necessarily need a response source.
- adds an audit log when an agent is added or removed from a team
- adds an audit log when an agent is added or removed from an inbox
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>