# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for resizing the reply editor up to nearly half the
screen height. It also deprecates the old modal-based pop-out reply box,
clicking the same button now expands the editor inline. Users can adjust
the height using the slider or the expand button.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/be27e1c06d19475ab404289710b3b0da
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Update BulkSelectBar to compute selection state (indeterminate/all) from
visible item IDs and only toggle selection for visible items. Preserve
existing selection for off-screen items when toggling, and guard against
empty visibility. Add detection/rendering for an optional
secondary-actions slot and adjust layout/divider. Also fix
ContactsBulkActionBar selection logic to determine "all selected" by
verifying every visible ID is in the selection. These changes ensure
correct select-all behavior with filtered/visible lists and support
additional UI actions.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d06b78d1-a64a-4c0c-a82a-f870140236c7
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
RubyLLM bundles a static models.json that doesn't know about models
released after the gem was published. Self-hosted users configuring
newer models hit ModelNotFoundError.
Added a rake task that refreshes the registry from models.dev and saves
to disk. ~~Called during Docker image build so every deploy gets fresh
model data. Falls back silently to the bundled registry if models.dev is
unreachable.~~
Commit the models.json file to code so it is available across
deployments.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Add migrations for document auto-sync
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
locally
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Summary
This PR enables the **Participating** conversation view in the main
sidebar and keeps the behavior aligned with existing conversation views.
## What changed
- Added **Participating** under Conversations in the new sidebar.
- Added a guard in conversation realtime `addConversation` flow so
generic `conversation.created` events are not injected while the user is
on Participating view.
- Added participating route mapping in conversation-list redirect helper
so list redirects resolve correctly to `/participating/conversations`.
## Scope notes
- Kept changes minimal and consistent with current `develop` behavior.
- No additional update-event filtering was added beyond what existing
views already do.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
## Linear ticket
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6839/blocked-contact-can-still-send-messages-to-whatsapp-inbox
## Description
Drop WhatsApp incoming messages from blocked contacts
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Incoming messages for blocked contacts
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds inline editing support for contact name, phone number,
email, and company fields in the conversation contact sidebar
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Screencast**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e9f8e37d-145b-4736-b27a-eb9ea66847bd
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
### Description
This PR fixes an issue where the editor would reset content and move the
cursor while typing. The issue was caused by a dual debounce setup
(400ms + 2500ms) that saved content and then overwrote local state with
stale API responses while the user was still typing.
### What changed
* Editor now uses local state (`localTitle`, `localContent`) as the
source of truth while editing
* Vuex store is only used on initial load or navigation
* Replaced dual debounce with a single 500ms debounce (fewer API calls)
* `UPDATE_ARTICLE` now merges updates instead of replacing the article
* Prevents status changes from wiping unsaved content
* Removed `updateAsync` for a simpler update flow
### How it works
User types
→ local ref updates immediately (editor reads from this)
→ 500ms debounce triggers
→ dispatches `articles/update`
→ API persists the change
→ on success: store merges the response (used by other components)
→ editor remains unaffected (continues using local state)
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6727/better-syncing-of-content-the-editor-randomly-updates-the-content
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
1. Open any Help Center article for editing
2. Type continuously for a few seconds — content should not reset or
jump
3. Change article status (publish/archive/draft) while editing — content
should remain intact
4. Test on a slow network (use DevTools throttling) — typing should
remain smooth
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
AI-generated summaries now respect the account's language setting.
Previously, summaries were always returned in English regardless of the
user's configured language, making section headings like "Customer
Intent" and "Action Items" appear in English even for non-English
accounts.
Previous behavior:
<img width="1336" height="790" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5df8b78b-1218-438d-9578-a806b5cb94ac"
/>
Current Behavior:
<img width="1253" height="372" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ae932c97-06da-4baf-9f77-9719bc9162e8"
/>
## What changed
- Added explicit account locale to the AI system prompt in
`Captain::SummaryService`
- Updated the summary prompt template to instruct the model to translate
section headings
## How to test
1. Configure an account with a non-English language (e.g., Portuguese)
2. Open a conversation with messages
3. Use the Copilot "Summarize" feature
4. Verify that section headings ("Customer Intent", "Conversation
Summary", etc.) appear in the account's language
---------
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds a Call model to track voice call state across providers (Twilio,
WhatsApp). This replaces storing call data in
conversation.additional_attributes and provides a foundation for call
analytics multi-call-per-conversation support, and future voice
providers.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
ConversationReplyMailer#parse_email calls
Mail::Address.new(email_string).address without error handling. When an
account's support_email contains a non-email string (e.g., "Smith
Smith"), the mail gem raises Mail::Field::IncompleteParseError, crashing
conversation transcript emails.
This has caused 1,056 errors on Sentry (EXTERNAL-CHATINC-JX) since Feb
25, all from a single account that has a name stored in the
support_email field instead of a valid email address.
Closes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6687/mailfieldincompleteparseerror-mailaddresslist-can-not-parse-orsmith
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
## Linear ticket
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6834/billing-upgrade-didnt-work
## Description
A `customer.subscription.updated` Stripe webhook for account 76162
returned 200 OK but did not persist the new `subscribed_quantity`. Root
cause: a race condition between the webhook handler and
`increment_response_usage` (Captain usage counter), both doing
read-modify-write on the `custom_attributes` JSONB column. The webhook
wrote `quantity: 6`, then a concurrent `save` from
`increment_response_usage` overwrote the entire hash with stale data —
restoring `quantity: 5`.
Fix: use atomic `jsonb_set` so usage counter updates only touch the
single key they care about, instead of rewriting the whole
`custom_attributes` hash. `increment_custom_attribute` also performs the
increment in SQL, making concurrent increments correct as well.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- New regression spec in `handle_stripe_event_service_spec.rb` that
simulates concurrent webhook + `increment_response_usage` and asserts
both `subscribed_quantity` and `captain_responses_usage` survive
- Existing account, billing, captain, and topup specs all pass locally
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Label attach/detach against a shared label no longer deadlocks under
parallel load. During high-concurrency label writes (for example, a
broadcast script attaching a campaign label to many conversations at
once), Chatwoot previously hit periodic `ActiveRecord::Deadlocked`
errors and tail-latency spikes on the tags table. This PR removes the
contention by disabling the `acts-as-taggable-on` counter cache, which
Chatwoot never reads.
## Closes
Fixes [INF-68](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/INF-68) (event 2)
## How to reproduce
1. Seed an account with ~20 conversations and 5 labels.
2. Spawn 20 parallel threads, each calling
`conversation.update!(label_list: shared_labels.shuffle)` against
different conversations.
3. Observe `ActiveRecord::Deadlocked` exceptions and p99 label-write
latency well above 1s.
With the counter cache disabled, the deadlock cycle cannot form.
## How this was tested
- Ran a 20-thread synthetic load test locally, each thread attaching 5
shared labels (shuffled per request) to different conversations. With
the counter cache enabled: 8 deadlocks across 300 attempts, p99 ~2.2s.
With the counter cache disabled: zero deadlocks, p99 ~306ms (roughly 85%
tail-latency reduction). The `UPDATE tags SET taggings_count = ...`
statement disappears from the SQL log entirely.
- Verified at boot via `rails runner` that
`ActsAsTaggableOn::Tagging.reflect_on_association(:tag).options[:counter_cache]`
returns `false` after the initializer runs. The gem wires `belongs_to
:tag, counter_cache: ActsAsTaggableOn.tags_counter` at class-load time,
so the initializer must sit ahead of the `Tagging` autoload path; this
confirms it does.
## Description
The IMAP email fetch job (Inboxes::FetchImapEmailsJob) crashes with an
unhandled IOError: closed stream when the mail server's SSL socket is
closed mid-write during Net::IMAP#fetch. This error was being reported
to Sentry because the rescue clause only caught EOFError, not its parent
class IOError.
Fixes
[CW-6689](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6689/ioerror-closed-stream-ioerror)
Widened the rescue in fetch_imap_emails_job.rb from EOFError to IOError.
In Ruby's exception hierarchy, EOFError is a subclass of IOError:
```
StandardError
└── IOError
└── EOFError
```
The Sentry stacktrace shows a plain IOError: closed stream raised from
OpenSSL::Buffering#do_write → Net::IMAP#put_string → Net::IMAP#fetch.
Since this is an IOError (not EOFError), it bypassed the existing rescue
and fell through to the StandardError catch-all, which reported it to
Sentry as an unhandled exception.
Rescuing IOError now catches both:
IOError: closed stream — the reported crash (parent class)
EOFError — the previously handled case (still caught as a subclass)
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Routing errors (404s) are expected in production and don't represent
actionable issues. Reporting them to New Relic creates noise and makes
it harder to spot real errors. Adds ActionController::RoutingError to
the New Relic error_collector.ignore_errors list so these are no longer
tracked as exceptions.
Removes sentry flooding of unnecessary rubyllm logs of wrong API key.
Logs only system api key error since it would be P0.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Description
Enable assignment v2 by default for new accounts
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
HandoffTool changes conversation status but only posts a private note.
ResponseBuilderJob now detects the tool flag and creates the public
handoff message that was previously only shown in V1.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Captain V2 was silently forwarding conversations to humans without
showing a handoff message to the customer. The conversation appeared to
just stop
responding.
Root cause: In V2, HandoffTool calls bot_handoff! during agent
execution, which changes conversation status from pending to open. By
the time control returns
to ResponseBuilderJob#process_response, the conversation_pending? guard
returns early - skipping create_handoff_message entirely. The V1 flow
didn't have this
problem because AssistantChatService just returns a string token
(conversation_handoff) and lets ResponseBuilderJob handle everything.
What changed:
1. AgentRunnerService now surfaces the handoff_tool_called flag (already
tracked internally for usage metadata) in its response hash.
2. ResponseBuilderJob#handoff_requested? detects handoffs from both V1
(response token) and V2 (tool flag).
3. ResponseBuilderJob#process_response checks handoff_requested? before
the conversation_pending? guard, so V2 handoffs are processed even when
the status has
already changed.
4. ResponseBuilderJob#process_action('handoff') captures
conversation_pending? before calling bot_handoff! and uses that snapshot
to guard both bot_handoff!
and the OOO message - preventing double-execution when V2's HandoffTool
already ran them.
New V2 handoff flow:
AgentRunnerService
→ agent calls HandoffTool (creates private note, calls bot_handoff!)
→ returns response with handoff_tool_called: true
ResponseBuilderJob#process_response
→ handoff_requested? detects the flag
→ process_action('handoff')
→ create_handoff_message (public message for customer)
→ bot_handoff! skipped (conversation_pending? is false)
→ OOO skipped (conversation_pending? is false)
Fixes#13881
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Update existing response_builder_job_spec.rb covering the V2 handoff
path, V2 normal response path, and V1 regression
- Updated existing agent_runner_service_spec.rb expectations for the new
handoff_tool_called key and added a context for when the flag is true
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
Comprehensive update to Traditional Chinese (Taiwan) translations. As a
native zh-TW speaker and active user based in Taiwan, I found the
existing translations were quite incomplete (~54% overall) with many
strings still in English. Some existing translations also used
Simplified Chinese terms or unnatural phrasing.
I chose to submit this as a direct PR rather than going through Crowdin
because working through all the files at once is much faster and lets me
ensure consistent terminology across the entire locale.
Closes#14003
## What changed
**Backend (`config/locales/zh_TW.yml`)**
- Translated all ~259 previously untranslated strings (was ~19%
complete, now 100%)
- Covers: error messages, notifications, activity logs, integration
descriptions, Captain AI, public portal, reports
**Frontend (42 JSON files under `dashboard/i18n/locale/zh_TW/`)**
- Translated ~2,627 previously untranslated strings (was ~50% complete,
now ~100%)
- Most impacted files: `inboxMgmt.json`, `integrations.json`,
`settings.json`, `conversation.json`, `contact.json`, `report.json`
**Quality fixes across all files**
- Replaced Simplified Chinese terms mixed into zh-TW: 账→帳, 获→取得, 模板→範本,
收件箱→收件匣, 重置→重設, 自定義→自訂
- Standardized terminology for consistency: 客服人員 (agent), 延後 (snooze),
稽核 (audit), 巨集 (macro)
- Fixed incorrect translations (e.g., audit log table headers were
swapped, availability label was wrong)
## How to test
1. Set account/user language to 中文（台灣）
2. Navigate through the dashboard — settings, inbox management,
integrations, reports, conversations
3. Verify strings display in natural Traditional Chinese with no
remaining English gaps
4. Check that all placeholders (names, counts, dates) render correctly
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes, block inline images in message signatures and prevent
auto signature insertion when editor is disabled.
- Strip inline base64 images from signature on save and show warning
message
- Add `INLINE_IMAGE_WARNING` translation key for signature inline image
removal notification
- Add disabled check to `addSignature()` to prevent signature insertion
when editor is disabled
- Add `isEditorDisabled` checks to signature toggle logic in
`toggleSignatureForDraft()`, `replaceText()`, and `clearMessage()`
- Remove unused `replaceText` from the codebase, which belongs to old
`textarea` editor
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6588/the-browser-hangs-when-the-message-signature-contains-inline-image
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/fb556b46a12a4308a737eed732d5ed73
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Account branding enrichment during signup
This PR does the following
### Replace Firecrawl with Context.dev
Switches the enterprise brand lookup from Firecrawl to Context.dev for
better data quality, built-in caching, and automatic filtering of
free/disposable email providers. The service interface changes from URL
to email input to match Context.dev's email endpoint. OSS still falls
back to basic HTML scraping with a normalized output shape across both
paths.
The enterprise path intentionally does not fall back to HTML scraping on
failure — speed matters more than completeness. We want the user on the
editable onboarding form fast, and a slow fallback scrape is worse than
letting them fill it in.
Requires `CONTEXT_DEV_API_KEY` in Super Admin → App Config. Without it,
falls back to OSS HTML scraping.
### Add job to enrich account details
After account creation, `Account::BrandingEnrichmentJob` looks up the
signup email and pre-fills the account name, colors, logos, social
links, and industry into `custom_attributes['brand_info']`.
The job signals completion via a short-lived Redis key (30s TTL) + an
ActionCable broadcast (`account.enrichment_completed`). The Redis key
lets the frontend distinguish "still running" from "finished with no
results."
Previously, signing up gave immediate access to the app. Now,
unconfirmed users are redirected to a verification page where they can
resend the confirmation email.
- After signup, the user is routed to `/auth/verify-email` instead of
the dashboard
- After login, unconfirmed users are redirected to the verification page
- The dashboard route guard catches unconfirmed users and redirects them
- `active_for_authentication?` is removed from the sessions controller
so unconfirmed users can authenticate — the frontend gates access
instead
- If the user visits the verification page after already confirming,
they're automatically redirected to the dashboard
- No session is issued until the user is verified
<details><summary>Demo</summary>
<p>
#### Fresh Signup
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/abb735e5-7c8e-44a2-801c-96d9e4823e51
#### Google Fresh Signup
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ab9e389a-a604-4a9d-b492-219e6d94ee3f
#### Create new account from Dashboard
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c456690d-1946-4e0b-834b-ad8efcea8369
</p>
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Custom tools is now discoverable on all plans
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Before:
<img width="390" height="446" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-02 at 13 40 11@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0a751954-f3ad-47d6-85b8-1e2f1476a646"
/>
After:
<img width="392" height="522" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-02 at 13 40 47@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62a252f6-2551-47a9-b50c-be949f08c456"
/>
<img width="1826" height="638" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-02 at 13 37 39@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/77dc2a75-3d76-44cf-8579-8d3457879bd0"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Fixes failing `agent_bot_listener_spec.rb` tests for
`conversation_status_changed` events. After #13892 added webhook
signing, `process_webhook_bot_event` passes `:agent_bot_webhook` and
`secret:`/`delivery_id:` kwargs to
`AgentBots::WebhookJob.perform_later`, but two spec expectations were
not updated to match the new call signature.
## What changed
- Updated `perform_later` expectations in `conversation_status_changed`
specs to include the `:agent_bot_webhook` type and `secret` keyword
arguments.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Agent bots assigned to a conversation were not receiving
`conversation_status_changed` webhook events. This meant bots could not
react to status transitions like moving a conversation to **pending**.
The deprecated `conversation_opened` and `conversation_resolved` events
were still being delivered, but the newer unified
`conversation_status_changed` event was silently dropped because
`AgentBotListener` had no handler for it.
## What changed
- Added `conversation_status_changed` handler to `AgentBotListener`,
matching the pattern already used by `WebhookListener`. The payload
includes `changed_attributes` so bots know which status transition
occurred.
## How to test
1. Configure an agent bot with an `outgoing_url` (e.g. a webhook.site
endpoint).
2. Assign the bot to an inbox or conversation.
3. Change a conversation's status to **pending** (or any other status).
4. Verify the bot receives a `conversation_status_changed` event with
the correct `changed_attributes`.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Account webhooks sign outgoing payloads with HMAC-SHA256, but agent bot
and API inbox webhooks were delivered unsigned. This PR adds the same
signing to both.
Each model gets a dedicated `secret` column rather than reusing the
agent bot's `access_token` (for API auth back into Chatwoot) or the API
inbox's `hmac_token` (for inbound contact identity verification). These
serve different trust boundaries and shouldn't be coupled — rotating a
signing secret shouldn't invalidate API access or contact verification.
The existing `Webhooks::Trigger` already signs when a secret is present,
so the backend change is just passing `secret:` through to the jobs.
Shared token logic is extracted into a `WebhookSecretable` concern
included by `Webhook`, `AgentBot`, and `Channel::Api`. The frontend
reuses the existing `AccessToken` component for secret display. Secrets
are admin-only and excluded from enterprise audit logs.
### How to test
Point an agent bot or API inbox webhook URL at a request inspector. Send
a message and verify `X-Chatwoot-Signature` and `X-Chatwoot-Timestamp`
headers are present. Reset the secret from settings and confirm
subsequent deliveries use the new value.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
The `conversation_updated` webhook sent to AgentBots did not include
`changed_attributes`, making it impossible for bots to distinguish
between different types of conversation updates (e.g. bot assignment vs
label change vs status change).
This aligns the AgentBot webhook payload with the existing
`WebhookListener` behavior, which already includes `changed_attributes`.
## How to reproduce
1. Assign an AgentBot to a conversation
2. Then update the conversation (e.g. add a label)
3. **Before fix:** Both events arrive with identical payload structure —
bot cannot tell them apart
4. **After fix:** Each event includes `changed_attributes` showing
exactly what changed
## What changed
- **`AgentBotListener#conversation_updated`**: Added
`changed_attributes` to the webhook payload using
`extract_changed_attributes` (same pattern as `WebhookListener`)
## How to test
1. Assign an AgentBot to a conversation via API
2. Check the webhook payload — should include:
```json
"changed_attributes": [
{ "assignee_agent_bot_id": { "previous_value": null, "current_value": 7
} }
]
```
3. Update the conversation (e.g. add a label)
4. Check the webhook payload — `changed_attributes` should reflect the
label change, not bot assignment
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Description
Two improvements to Agent Capacity Policy:
**1. Support exclusion via zero conversation limit**
Allow `conversation_limit` to be `0` on inbox capacity limits. Agents
with a zero limit are excluded from auto-assignment for that inbox while
remaining members for manual assignment.
**2. Fix exclusion rules duration input**
- Default changed from `10` to `null` so time-based exclusion isn't
applied unless explicitly set.
- Minimum lowered from 10 to 1 minute.
- `DurationInput` updated to handle `null` values correctly.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added model and capacity service specs for zero-limit exclusion
behavior.
- Tested manually via UI flows
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Summary
When a Super Admin creates a new account via the Administrate dashboard,
the `manually_managed_features` field (a virtual attribute stored in
`internal_attributes` JSON) is passed to `Account.new(...)`, raising
`ActiveModel::UnknownAttributeError`. The existing `update` action
already strips this param — this fix adds the same handling to `create`.
Closes -> https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/INF-66
Related Sentry ->
https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/7168237533/?project=6382945&referrer=Linear
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How to reproduce
1. Log in as Super Admin
2. Navigate to Accounts → New
3. Fill in the form (with or without manually managed features selected)
4. Submit → `ActiveModel::UnknownAttributeError: unknown attribute
'manually_managed_features' for Account`
## What changed
- Added a `create` override in
`Enterprise::SuperAdmin::AccountsController` that strips
`manually_managed_features` from params before calling `super`, then
persists them via `InternalAttributesService` after the account is
saved.
Previously, all incoming messages from Facebook channel with
instagram_id had their attachment data_url and thumb_url overridden with
external_url. This caused issues for non-Instagram conversations
originating from Facebook Message where the file URL should be used
instead.
Narrows the override to only apply when the conversation type is
instagram_direct_message, which is the only case where Instagram's CDN
URLs need to be used directly.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6722/videos-are-missing-in-facebook-conversation
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When an AgentBot is assigned to a conversation after the first message
has already been received, the bot does not respond because it never
receives any event. The `message_created` event fires before the bot is
assigned, and the bot has no way to know it was assigned.
Chatwoot already dispatches a `CONVERSATION_UPDATED` event when
`assignee_agent_bot_id` changes, but `AgentBotListener` wasn't listening
for it. This fix adds a `conversation_updated` handler so the bot
receives a webhook with the conversation context when assigned.
## How to reproduce
1. Customer sends a message → conversation created, `message_created`
fires
2. System processes the message (adds labels, custom attributes)
3. System assigns an AgentBot to the conversation via API
4. **Before fix:** Bot receives no event and never responds
5. **After fix:** Bot receives `conversation_updated` event with
conversation payload
## What changed
- **`AgentBotListener`**: Added `conversation_updated` handler that
sends the conversation webhook payload to the assigned bot when the
conversation is updated
## How to test
1. Create an AgentBot with an `outgoing_url` pointing to a webhook
inspector (e.g. webhook.site)
2. Send a message to create a conversation
3. Assign the AgentBot to the conversation via API:
```
POST /api/v1/accounts/{id}/conversations/{id}/assignments
{ "assignee_id": <bot_id>, "assignee_type": "AgentBot" }
```
4. Verify the bot receives a `conversation_updated` event at its webhook
URL
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
### Description
When integrating the web widget via the JS SDK, customers call
setConversationCustomAttributes and setLabel on chatwoot:ready — before
any conversation exists. These API calls silently fail because the
backend endpoints require an existing conversation. When the visitor
sends their first message, the conversation is created without those
attributes/labels, so the message_created webhook payload is missing the
expected metadata.
This change queues SDK-set conversation custom attributes and labels in
the widget store when no conversation exists yet, and includes them in
the API request when the first message (or attachment) creates the
conversation. The backend now permits and applies these params during
conversation creation — before the message is saved and webhooks fire.
### How to test
1. Configure a web widget without a pre-chat form.
2. Open the widget on a test page and run the following in the browser
console after chatwoot:ready:
`window.$chatwoot.setConversationCustomAttributes({ plan: 'enterprise'
});`
`window.$chatwoot.setLabel('vip');` // must be a label that exists in
the account
3. Send the first message from the widget.
4. Verify in the Chatwoot dashboard that the conversation has plan:
enterprise in custom attributes and the vip label applied.
5. Set up a webhook subscriber for `message_created` confirm the first
payload includes the conversation metadata.
6. Verify that calling `setConversationCustomAttributes` / `setLabel` on
an existing conversation still works as before (direct API path, no
regression).
7. Verify the pre-chat form flow still works as expected.
Attachment webhook event payloads (`message_created`) were missing the
file extension and content type. The `extension` column existed but was
never populated, and `content_type` was not included in the payload at
all.
## What changed
- Added `before_save :set_extension` callback to extract file extension
from the filename when saving an attachment.
- Added `content_type` (from ActiveStorage) to the `file_metadata` used
in `push_event_data`.
### Before
```json
{
"extension": null,
"data_url": "...",
"file_size": 11960
}
```
### After
```json
{
"extension": "pdf",
"content_type": "application/pdf",
"data_url": "...",
"file_size": 11960
}
```
## How to reproduce
1. Send a message with a file attachment (e.g., PDF) via any channel
2. Inspect the `message_created` webhook payload
3. Observe `extension` is `null` and `content_type` is missing
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Adds custom tool support to v1
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
<img width="1816" height="958" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 37 33@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2777a953-8b65-4a2d-88ec-39f395b3fb47"
/>
<img width="378" height="488" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 38 18@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f6973c99-efd0-40e4-90fe-4472a2f63cea"
/>
<img width="1884" height="1452" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 38
32@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fba4fc4-0c33-46da-888a-52ec6bad6130"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
When a user signs up with an email they don't own and sets a password,
that password remains valid even after the real owner later signs in via
OAuth. This means the original registrant — who never proved ownership
of the email — retains working credentials on the account. This change
closes that gap by rotating the password to a random value whenever an
unconfirmed user completes an OAuth sign-in.
The check (`oauth_user_needs_password_reset?`) is evaluated before
`skip_confirmation!` runs, since confirmation would flip `confirmed_at`
and mask the condition. If the user was unconfirmed, the stored password
is replaced with a secure random string that satisfies the password
policy. This applies to both the web and mobile OAuth callback paths, as
well as the sign-up path where the password is rotated before the reset
token is generated.
Users who lose access to password-based login as a side effect can
recover through the standard "Forgot password" flow at any time. Since
they've already proven email ownership via OAuth, this is a low-friction
recovery path
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes an issue where markdown tables were not rendering
correctly in the Help Center.
The issue was caused by a backslash `(\)` being appended after table row
separators `(|)`, which breaks the markdown table parsing.
The issue was introduced after recent editor changes made to preserve
new lines, which unintentionally affected how table markdown is parsed
and displayed.
### https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/44
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6714/markdown-tables-dont-render-properly-in-help-centre-preview
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Before**
```
| Type | What you provide |\
|--------------|-------------------------------|\
| None | No authentication |\
| Bearer Token | A token string |\
| Basic Auth | Username and password |\
| API Key | A custom header name and value|
```
**After**
```
| Type | What you provide |
|--------------|-------------------------------|
| None | No authentication |
| Bearer Token | A token string |
| Basic Auth | Username and password |
| API Key | A custom header name and value|
```
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Summary
- Add `MutexApplicationJob::LockAcquisitionError` to Sentry's
`excluded_exceptions`
- This error is expected control flow (mutex lock contention during
webhook processing), not a bug
- Generated ~131K Sentry events in March 2026, 100% from
`InstagramEventsJob`
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/INF-58
