The index is already added in production.
Adds a new reporting API that returns conversation counts grouped by
channel type and first response time buckets (0-1h, 1-4h, 4-8h, 8-24h,
24h+).
- GET /api/v2/accounts/:id/reports/first_response_time_distribution
- Uses SQL aggregation to handle large datasets efficiently
- Adds composite index on reporting_events for query performance
Tested on production workload.
Request: GET
`/api/v2/accounts/1/reports/first_response_time_distribution?since=<since>&until=<until>`
Response payload:
```
{
"Channel::WebWidget": {
"0-1h": 120,
"1-4h": 85,
"4-8h": 32,
"8-24h": 12,
"24h+": 3
},
"Channel::Email": {
"0-1h": 12,
"1-4h": 28,
"4-8h": 45,
"8-24h": 35,
"24h+": 10
},
"Channel::FacebookPage": {
"0-1h": 50,
"1-4h": 30,
"4-8h": 15,
"8-24h": 8,
"24h+": 2
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Fixes # (issue)
When we migrated to RubyLLM, images weren't being sent properly in
RubyLLM format to the model, so it did not understand images.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
specs + local testing
Current behaviour on staging:
<img width="772" height="1012" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7b7d360f-dea4-48af-b20b-ee4c98a38a85"
/>
local testing with fix:
<img width="792" height="1216" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5ef82452-015e-4bda-a68f-884d00acb014"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
We are expanding Chatwoot’s automation capabilities by
introducing **Conversation Workflows**, a dedicated section in settings
where teams can configure rules that govern how conversations are closed
and what information agents must fill before resolving. This feature
helps teams enforce data consistency, collect structured resolution
information, and ensure downstream reporting is accurate.
Instead of having auto‑resolution buried inside Account Settings, we
introduced a new sidebar item:
- Auto‑resolve conversations (existing behaviour)
- Required attributes on resolution (new)
This groups all conversation‑closing logic into a single place.
#### Required Attributes on Resolve
Admins can now pick which custom conversation attributes must be filled
before an agent can resolve a conversation.
**How it works**
- Admin selects one or more attributes from the list of existing
conversation level custom attributes.
- These selected attributes become mandatory during resolution.
- List all the attributes configured via Required Attributes (Text,
Number, Link, Date, List, Checkbox)
- When an agent clicks Resolve Conversation:
If attributes already have values → the conversation resolves normally.
If attributes are missing → a modal appears prompting the agent to fill
them.
<img width="1554" height="1282" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 42
23@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4cd5d6e1-abe8-4999-accd-d4a08913b373"
/>
#### Custom Attributes Integration
On the Custom Attributes page, we will surfaced indicators showing how
each attribute is being used.
Each attribute will show badges such as:
- Resolution → used in the required‑on‑resolve workflow
- Pre‑chat form → already existing
<img width="2390" height="1822" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 43
42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b92a6eb7-7f6c-40e6-bf23-6a5310f2d9c5"
/>
#### Admin Flow
- Navigate to Settings → Conversation Workflows.
- Under Required attributes on resolve, click Add Required Attribute.
- Pick from the dropdown list of conversation attributes.
- Save changes.
Agents will now be prompted automatically whenever they resolve.
<img width="2434" height="872" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 44 42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/632fc0e5-767c-4a1c-8cf4-ffe3d058d319"
/>
#### NOTES
- The Required Attributes on Resolve modal should only appear when
values are missing.
- Required attributes must block the resolution action until satisfied.
- Bulk‑resolve actions should follow the same rules — any conversation
missing attributes cannot be bulk‑resolved, rest will be resolved, show
a notification that the resolution cannot be done.
- API resolution does not respect the attributes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
CSAT scores are helpful, but on their own they rarely tell the full
story. A drop in rating can come from delayed timelines, unclear
expectations, or simple misunderstandings, even when the issue itself
was handled correctly.
Review Notes for CSAT let admins/report manager roles add internal-only
context next to each CSAT response. This makes it easier to interpret
scores properly and focus on patterns and root causes, not just numbers.
<img width="2170" height="1680" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56df7fab-d0a7-4a94-95b9-e4c459ad33d5"
/>
### Why this matters
* Capture the real context behind individual CSAT ratings
* Clarify whether a low score points to a genuine service issue or a
process gap
* Spot recurring themes across conversations and teams
* Make CSAT reviews more useful for leadership reviews and
retrospectives
### How Review Notes work
**View CSAT responses**
Open the CSAT report to see overall metrics, rating distribution, and
individual responses.
**Add a Review Note**
For any CSAT entry, managers can add a Review Note directly below the
customer’s feedback.
**Document internal insights**
Use Review Notes to capture things like:
* Why a score was lower or higher than expected
* Patterns you are seeing across similar cases
* Observations around communication, timelines, or customer expectations
Review Notes are visible only to administrators and people with report
access only. We may expand visibility to agents in the future based on
feedback. However, customers never see them.
Each note clearly shows who added it and when, making it easy to review
context and changes over time.
## Description
Adds the ability to sort companies by the number of contacts they have
(contacts_count) in ascending or descending order. This is part of the
Chatwoot 5.0 release requirements for the companies feature.
The implementation uses a scope-based approach consistent with other
sorting implementations in the codebase (e.g., contacts sorting by
last_activity_at).
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Available Sorting Options
After this change, the Companies API supports the following sorting
options:
| Sort Field | Type | Ascending | Descending |
|------------|------|-----------|------------|
| `name` | string | `?sort=name` | `?sort=-name` |
| `domain` | string | `?sort=domain` | `?sort=-domain` |
| `created_at` | datetime | `?sort=created_at` | `?sort=-created_at` |
| `contacts_count` | integer (scope) | `?sort=contacts_count` |
`?sort=-contacts_count` |
**Note:** Prefix with `-` for descending order. Companies with NULL
contacts_count will appear last (NULLS LAST).
## CURL Examples
**Sort by contacts count (ascending):**
```bash
curl -X GET 'https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/companies?sort=contacts_count' \
-H 'api_access_token: YOUR_API_TOKEN'
```
**Sort by contacts count (descending):**
```bash
curl -X GET 'https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/companies?sort=-contacts_count' \
-H 'api_access_token: YOUR_API_TOKEN'
```
**Sort by name (ascending):**
```bash
curl -X GET 'https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/companies?sort=name' \
-H 'api_access_token: YOUR_API_TOKEN'
```
**Sort by created_at (descending):**
```bash
curl -X GET 'https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/companies?sort=-created_at' \
-H 'api_access_token: YOUR_API_TOKEN'
```
**With pagination:**
```bash
curl -X GET 'https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/companies?sort=-contacts_count&page=2' \
-H 'api_access_token: YOUR_API_TOKEN'
```
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added RSpec tests for both ascending and descending sort
- All 24 existing specs pass
- Manually tested the sorting functionality with test data
**Test configuration:**
- Ruby 3.4.4
- Rails 7.1.5.2
- PostgreSQL (test database)
**To reproduce:**
1. Run `bundle exec rspec
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb`
2. All tests should pass (24 examples, 0 failures)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
## Technical Details
**Backend changes:**
- Controller: Added `sort_on :contacts_count` with scope-based sorting
- Model: Added `order_on_contacts_count` scope using
`Arel::Nodes::SqlLiteral` and `sanitize_sql_for_order` with `NULLS LAST`
for consistent NULL handling
- Specs: Added 2 new tests for ascending/descending sort validation
**Files changed:**
- `enterprise/app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller.rb`
- `enterprise/app/models/company.rb`
-
`spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb`
**Note:** This PR only includes the backend implementation. Frontend
changes (sort menu UI + i18n) will follow in a separate commit.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
When AgentBot responds to customer messages, the `waiting_since`
timestamp is not reset, causing inflated reply time metrics when a human
agent eventually responds. This results in inaccurate reporting that
incorrectly includes periods when customers were satisfied with bot
responses.
### Timeline from Production Data
```
Dec 12, 16:20:14 - Customer sends message (ID: 368451924)
↓ waiting_since = Dec 12, 16:20:14
Dec 12, 16:20:17 - AgentBot replies (ID: 368451960)
↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 ❌
↓ (Bot response doesn't clear it)
14-day gap - Customer satisfied, no messages
↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 ❌
Dec 26, 22:25:45 - Customer sends new message (ID: 383522275)
↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 ❌
↓ (New message doesn't reset it)
Dec 26-27 - More AgentBot interactions
↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 ❌
Dec 27, 07:36:53 - Human agent finally replies (ID: 383799517)
↓ Reply time calculated: 1,268,404 seconds
↓ = 14.7 DAYS ❌
```
## Root Cause
The core issues is in `app/models/message.rb`, where **AgentBot messages
does not clear `waiting_since`** - The `human_response?` method only
returns true for `User` senders, so bot replies never trigger the
clearing logic. This means once `waiting_since` is set, it stays set
even when customers send new messages after receiving bot responses.
The solution is to simply reset `waiting_since` **after a bot has
responded**. This ensures reply time metrics reflect actual human agent
response times, not bot-handled periods.
### What triggers the rest
This is an intentional "gotcha", that only `AgentBot` and
`Captain::Assistant` messages trigger the waiting time reset. Automation
and campaign messages maintain current behavior (no reset). This is
because interactive bot assistants provide conversational help that
might satisfy customers. Automation and campaigns are one-way
communications and shouldn't affect waiting time calculations.
## Related Work
Extends PR #11787 which fixed `waiting_since` clearing on conversation
resolution. This PR addresses the bot interaction scenario which was not
covered by that fix.
Scripts to clean data:
https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/bd133208e219d0ab52fbfdf03036c48a
This PR fixes the HTTP 500 timeout errors occurring when deleting SLA
policies that have large volumes of historical data.
The fix moves the deletion workflow to asynchronous background
processing using the existing `DeleteObjectJob`.
By offloading heavy cascaded deletions (applied SLAs, SLA events,
conversation nullifications) from the request cycle, the API can now
return immediately while the cleanup continues in the background
avoiding the `Rack::Timeout::RequestTimeoutException`. This ensures that
SLA policies can be deleted reliably, regardless of data size.
### Problem
Deleting an SLA policy via `DELETE
/api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/sla_policies/{id}` fails consistently with
`Rack::Timeout::RequestTimeoutException (15s)` for policies with large
amounts of related data.
Because the current implementation performs all dependent deletions
**synchronously**, Rails processes:
- `has_many :applied_slas, dependent: :destroy` (thousands)
- Each `AppliedSla#destroy` → triggers destruction of many `SlaEvent`
records
- `has_many :conversations, dependent: :nullify` (thousands)
This processing far exceeds the Rack timeout window and consistently
triggers HTTP 500 errors for users.
### Solution
This PR applies the same pattern used successfully in Inbox deletion.
**Move deletion to async background jobs**
- Uses `DeleteObjectJob` for centralized, reliable cleanup.
- Allows the DELETE API call to respond immediately.
**Chunk large datasets**
- Records are processed in **batches of 5,000** to reduce DB load and
avoid job timeouts.
## Description
- Replaces Stripe Checkout session flow with direct card charging for AI
credit top-ups
- Adds a two-step confirmation modal (select package → confirm purchase)
for better UX
- Creates Stripe invoice directly and charges the customer's default
payment method immediately
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Using the specs
- UI manual test cases
<img width="945" height="580" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/52bdad46-cd0e-4927-b13f-54c6b6353bcc"
/>
<img width="945" height="580" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/231bc7e9-41ac-440d-a93d-cba45a4d3e3e"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
We’ve been watching Sidekiq workers climb from ~600 MB at boot to
1.4–1.5 GB after an hour whenever attachment-heavy jobs run. This PR is
an experiment to curb that growth by streaming attachments instead of
loading the whole blob into Ruby: reply-mailer inline attachments,
Telegram uploads, and audio transcriptions now read/write in chunks. If
this keeps RSS stable in production we’ll keep it; otherwise we’ll roll
it back and keep digging
## Description
Adds API endpoint to list companies with pagination, search, and
sorting.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5930/add-backend-routes-to-get-companies-result
Parent issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5928/add-companies-tab-to-dashboard
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Added comprehensive specs to
`spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb`:
- Pagination (25 per page, multiple pages)
- Search by name and domain (case-insensitive)
- Counter cache for contacts_count
- Account scoping
- Authorization
To reproduce:
```bash
bundle exec rspec spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb
bundle exec rubocop enterprise/app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller.rb
```
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Linear Link
## Description
This PR introduces a new robust auto-assignment system for conversations
in Chatwoot. The system replaces the existing round-robin assignment
with a more sophisticated service-based architecture that supports
multiple assignment strategies, rate limiting, and Enterprise features
like capacity-based assignment and balanced distribution.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Unit test cases
- Test conversations getting assigned on status change to open
- Test the job directly via rails console
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Adds a new service-based auto-assignment system with scheduled jobs,
rate limiting, enterprise capacity/balanced selection, and wiring via
inbox/handler; includes Redis helpers and comprehensive tests.
>
> - **Auto-assignment v2 (core services)**:
> - Add `AutoAssignment::AssignmentService` with bulk assignment,
configurable conversation priority, RR selection, and per-agent rate
limiting via `AutoAssignment::RateLimiter`.
> - Add `AutoAssignment::RoundRobinSelector` for agent selection.
> - **Jobs & scheduling**:
> - Add `AutoAssignment::AssignmentJob` (per-inbox bulk assign;
env-based limit) and `AutoAssignment::PeriodicAssignmentJob` (batch over
accounts/inboxes).
> - Schedule periodic run in `config/schedule.yml`
(`periodic_assignment_job`).
> - **Model/concerns wiring**:
> - Include `InboxAgentAvailability` in `Inbox`; add
`Inbox#auto_assignment_v2_enabled?`.
> - Update `AutoAssignmentHandler` to trigger v2 job when
`auto_assignment_v2_enabled?`, else fallback to legacy.
> - **Enterprise extensions**:
> - Add `Enterprise::InboxAgentAvailability` (capacity-aware filtering)
and `Enterprise::Concerns::Inbox` association `inbox_capacity_limits`.
> - Extend service via `Enterprise::AutoAssignment::AssignmentService`
(policy-driven config, capacity filtering, exclusion rules) and add
selectors/services: `BalancedSelector`, `CapacityService`.
> - **Infrastructure**:
> - Enhance `Redis::Alfred` with `expire`, key scan/count, and extended
ZSET helpers (`zadd`, `zcount`, `zcard`, `zrangebyscore`).
> - **Tests**:
> - Add specs for jobs, core service, rate limiter, RR selector, and
enterprise features (capacity, balanced selection, exclusions).
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
0ebe187c8aea73765b0122a44b18d6f465c2477f. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
## Description
Implements real-time company auto-association for contacts based on
email domains. This is **Part 2** of the company model production
rollout (CW-5726).
**Task:**
- When a contact is created with a business email, automatically create
and associate a company from the email domain
- When a contact is updated with an email for the first time (email was
previously nil), associate with a company
- Preserve existing company associations when email changes to avoid
user confusion
- Skip free email providers and disposable domains
**Dependencies:**
⚠️ Requires PR #12657 (Part 1: Backfill migration) to be merged first
**Linear ticket:**
[CW-5726](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5726/company-model-setting-it-up-on-production)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Service specs: Tests business email detection, company creation,
association logic, edge cases (existing companies, free emails, nil
emails)
- Integration specs: Tests full callback flow for contact create/update
scenarios
- All tests passing: 10 examples, 0 failures
- RuboCop: 0 offenses
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules (PR #12657 pending)
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Description
Implements company backfill migration infrastructure for existing
contacts. This is **Part 1 of 2** for the company model production
rollout as described in
[CW-5726](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5726/company-model-setting-it-up-on-production).
Creates jobs and services to associate existing contacts with companies
based on their email domains, filtering out free email providers (gmail,
yahoo, etc.) and disposable addresses.
**What's included:**
- Business email detector service with ValidEmail2 (uses
`disposable_domain?` to avoid DNS lookups)
- Per-account batch job to process contacts for one account
- Orchestrator job to iterate all accounts
- Rake task: `bundle exec rake companies:backfill`
~~*NOTE*: I'm using a hard-coded approach to determine if something is a
"business" email by filtering out emails that are usually personal. I've
also added domains that are common to some of our customers' regions.
This should be simpler. I looked into `Valid_Email2` and I couldn't find
anything to dictate whether an email is a personal email or a business
one. I don't think the approach used in the frontend is valid here.~~
UPDATE: Using `email_provider_info` gem instead.
**Pending - Part 2 (separate PR):** Real-time company creation for new
contacts
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
```bash
# Run all new tests
bundle exec rspec spec/enterprise/services/companies/business_email_detector_service_spec.rb \\
spec/enterprise/jobs/migration/company_account_batch_job_spec.rb \\
spec/enterprise/jobs/migration/company_backfill_job_spec.rb
# Run RuboCop
bundle exec rubocop enterprise/app/services/companies/business_email_detector_service.rb \\
enterprise/app/jobs/migration/company_account_batch_job.rb \\
enterprise/app/jobs/migration/company_backfill_job.rb \\
lib/tasks/companies.rake
```
**Performance optimization:**
- Uses `disposable_domain?` instead of `disposable?` to avoid DNS MX
lookups (discovered via tcpdump analysis - `disposable?` was making
network calls for every email, causing 100x slowdown)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Summary
- Fix captain response builder not getting triggered for cases where
responses are created as completed.
## Testing Instructions
- Test articles with firecrawl
- Test articles without firecrawl
- Test PDF documents
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
This PR is the first of many to simplify the process of building an
assistant. The new flow will only require the user’s website. We’ll
automatically crawl it, identify the business name and what the business
does, and then generate a suggested assistant persona, complete with a
proposed name and description.
This service returns the following.
Example: tooljet.com
<img width="795" height="217" alt="Screenshot 2025-10-25 at 2 55 04 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9cb3594a-9c9c-4970-a0a1-4c9c8869c193"
/>
Example: replit.com
<img width="797" height="176" alt="Screenshot 2025-10-25 at 2 56 42 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6a1b4266-aab6-455f-a5e3-696d3a8243c9"
/>
## Context
Sidekiq logs only showed the Sidekiq wrapper class and JID, which wasn’t
helpful when debugging ActiveJobs.
## Changes
- Updated `ChatwootDequeuedLogger` to log the actual `ActiveJob class`
and `job_id` instead of the generic Sidekiq wrapper and JID.
> Example
> ```
> Dequeued ActionMailer::MailDeliveryJob
123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426614174000 from default
> ```
- Remove sidekiq worker and unify everything to `ActiveJob`
# Pull Request Template
## Description
* add Company model with validations for name, domain, description and
avatar
* Add database migration fo
* Implement endpoints for company CRUD operations
* Add optional company relationship for contacts
* Add test for models, controllers, factories and policies
* Add authorization policies restricting delete to admins
* support JSON API responses
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes #(cw-5650)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tests are implemented using `RSpec`
```
$ bundle exec rails db:migrate
$ bundle exec rspec spec/models/company_spec.rb spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb
```
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Linear:
- https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/486
## Description
This PR implements Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) support for user
accounts, enhancing security by requiring a second form of verification
during login. The feature adds TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password)
authentication with QR code generation and backup codes for account
recovery.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added comprehensive RSpec tests for MFA controller functionality
- Tested MFA setup flow with QR code generation
- Verified OTP validation and backup code generation
- Tested login flow with MFA enabled/disabled
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
I've added the account_id filter to the
`get_agent_ids_over_assignment_limit` method. This optimization will
help the query leverage the existing composite index
`conv_acid_inbid_stat_asgnid_idx (account_id, inbox_id, status,
assignee_id)` for better performance.
**Before:**
```sql
HashAggregate (cost=224238.12..224256.27 rows=484 width=4)
Group Key: assignee_id
Filter: (count(*) >= 10)
-> Index Scan using index_conversations_on_inbox_id on conversations (cost=0.44..223963.67 rows=54891 width=4)
Index Cond: (inbox_id = ???)
Filter: (status = 0)
```
**After:**
```sql
GroupAggregate (cost=0.44..5688.30 rows=476 width=4)
Group Key: assignee_id
Filter: (count(*) >= 10)
-> Index Only Scan using conv_acid_inbid_stat_asgnid_idx on conversations (cost=0.44..5640.81 rows=5928 width=4)
Index Cond: ((account_id = ??) AND (inbox_id = ??) AND (status = 0))
```
