This pull request fixes the model annotation tooling due to previous
incomplete migration from `annotate` to `annotaterb` gem (#12600). It
also improves the handling of serialized values in the
`InstallationConfig` model by ensuring a default value is set,
simplifying the code, and removing a workaround for YAML
deserialization.
**Annotation tooling updates:**
* Added `.annotaterb.yml` to configure the `annotate_rb` gem with
project-specific options, centralizing annotation settings.
* Replaced the custom `auto_annotate_models.rake` task with the standard
rake task from `annotate_rb`, and added `lib/tasks/annotate_rb.rake` to
load annotation tasks in development environments.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-9450d2359e45f1db407b3871dde787a25d60bb721aed179a65ffd2692e95fb4bL1-L61)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-578cdfc7ad56637e42472ea891ea286dff8803d9a1750afdbfeafec164d9b8b2R1-R8)
**Model serialization improvements:**
* Updated the `InstallationConfig` model to set a default value for the
`serialized_value` attribute, ensuring it always has a hash with
indifferent access and removing the need for a deserialization
workaround in the `value` method.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-b4bdde42c1ad0f584073818bd43dbd865b1b3b50d4701b131979f900d7c68297L22-R22)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-b4bdde42c1ad0f584073818bd43dbd865b1b3b50d4701b131979f900d7c68297L36-L39)
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
CSAT scores are helpful, but on their own they rarely tell the full
story. A drop in rating can come from delayed timelines, unclear
expectations, or simple misunderstandings, even when the issue itself
was handled correctly.
Review Notes for CSAT let admins/report manager roles add internal-only
context next to each CSAT response. This makes it easier to interpret
scores properly and focus on patterns and root causes, not just numbers.
<img width="2170" height="1680" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56df7fab-d0a7-4a94-95b9-e4c459ad33d5"
/>
### Why this matters
* Capture the real context behind individual CSAT ratings
* Clarify whether a low score points to a genuine service issue or a
process gap
* Spot recurring themes across conversations and teams
* Make CSAT reviews more useful for leadership reviews and
retrospectives
### How Review Notes work
**View CSAT responses**
Open the CSAT report to see overall metrics, rating distribution, and
individual responses.
**Add a Review Note**
For any CSAT entry, managers can add a Review Note directly below the
customer’s feedback.
**Document internal insights**
Use Review Notes to capture things like:
* Why a score was lower or higher than expected
* Patterns you are seeing across similar cases
* Observations around communication, timelines, or customer expectations
Review Notes are visible only to administrators and people with report
access only. We may expand visibility to agents in the future based on
feedback. However, customers never see them.
Each note clearly shows who added it and when, making it easy to review
context and changes over time.
This PR addresses several items listed in our rubocop_todo by implementing the necessary corrections and enhancements. As a result, we are now able to remove the rubocop_todo file entirely, streamlining our codebase and ensuring adherence to our coding standards.
fixes: https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-1806/chore-rubocop-audit
