Documents the missing account-level label CRUD endpoints in Chatwoot's
Swagger output so label management is discoverable alongside the
existing contact and conversation label APIs.
Fixes: none
Closes: none
Why
The account-level label API already exists in Chatwoot, but it was
missing from the published Swagger spec. That made label management
harder to discover even though contact and conversation label assignment
endpoints were already documented.
What this change does
- adds a `Labels` tag to the application Swagger docs
- adds the label resource and create/update payload schemas
- documents `GET/POST /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/labels`
- documents `GET/PATCH/DELETE /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/labels/{id}`
- regenerates the compiled Swagger JSON artifacts
Validation
- rebuilt the Swagger JSON from the source YAML
- verified the new label endpoints appear in `swagger/swagger.json`
- verified the new label endpoints appear in
`swagger/tag_groups/application_swagger.json`
- started the local Rails server and confirmed `/swagger` and
`/swagger/swagger.json` return `200 OK`
Adds Skooma-based OpenAPI validation so SDK-facing request specs can
assert that documented request and response contracts match real Rails
behavior. This also upgrades the spec to OpenAPI 3.1 and fixes contract
drift uncovered while validating core application and platform
resources.
Closes
None
Why
We want CI to catch OpenAPI drift before it reaches SDK consumers. While
wiring validation in, this PR surfaced several mismatches between the
documented contract and what the Rails endpoints actually accept or
return.
What this change does
- Adds Skooma-backed OpenAPI validation to the request spec flow and a
dedicated OpenAPI validation spec.
- Migrates nullable schema definitions to OpenAPI 3.1-compatible unions.
- Updates core SDK-facing schemas and payloads across accounts,
contacts, conversations, inboxes, messages, teams, reporting events, and
platform account resources.
- Documents concrete runtime cases that were previously missing or
inaccurate, including nested `profile` update payloads, multipart avatar
uploads, required profile update bodies, nullable inbox feature flags,
and message sender types that include both `Captain::Assistant` and
senderless activity-style messages.
- Regenerates the committed Swagger JSON and tag-group artifacts used by
CI sync checks.
Validation
- `bundle exec rake swagger:build`
- `bundle exec rspec spec/swagger/openapi_spec.rb`
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Description
When working with webhooks, it's easy to lose track of which URL is
which. Adding a `name` (optional) column to the webhook model is a
straight-forward solution to make it significantly easier to identify
webhooks.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Model and controller specs, and also running in production over several
months without any issues.
| Before | After |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="949" height="990" alt="image copy 3"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6b33c072-7d16-4a9c-a129-f9c0751299f5"
/> | <img width="806" height="941" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/77f3cb3a-2eb0-41ac-95bf-d02915589690"
/> |
| <img width="1231" height="650" alt="image copy 2"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/583374af-96e0-4436-b026-4ce79b7f9321"
/> | <img width="1252" height="650" alt="image copy"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa81fb31-fd18-4e21-a40e-d8ab0dc76b4e"
/> |
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Currently, the swagger spec doesn't follow the Swagger 2.0 specification. So, I facing 4 errors when trying generate the Golang client for chatwoot.
Due to the spec, the binary field should use format: binary beside type: string
Signed-off-by: Giau. Tran Minh <hello@giautm.dev>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Added the ability to update the contact's avatar via API and Dashboard.
- Contact create and update APIs can now accept avatar attachment parameters [form data].
- Contact create and update endpoints can now accept the avatar_url parameter.[json]
- API endpoint to remove a contact avatar.
- Updated Contact create/edit UI components with avatar support
Fixes: #3428
This fixes issues in the swagger.json file. The motivation to do so is to be able to generate API clients using https://openapi-generator.tech Doing so will require further changes to the api spec, but this seems like a good first step since it is now "valid" according to editor.swagger.io and openapi-generator validate.
Fixes#2806
- API to fetch info of a single inbox
- Document passing custom_attributes in the API
- Ability to filter contacts with contact identifier in search API
* Added the documentation for the conversation APIs - 8 endpoints
* Added descriptions for the existing endpoints
* Added new resource models and updated some parts of the contact API
