CSAT templates for WhatsApp are submitted as Utility, but Meta may
reclassify them as Marketing based on content, which can significantly
increase messaging costs.
This PR introduces a Captain-powered CSAT template analyzer for
WhatsApp/Twilio WhatsApp that predicts utility fit, explains likely
risks, and suggests safer rewrites before submission. The flow is manual
(button-triggered), Captain-gated, and applies rewrites only on explicit
user action. It also updates UX copy to clearly set expectations: the
system submits as Utility, Meta makes the final categorization decision.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6424/ai-powered-whatsapp-template-classifier-for-csat-submissionshttps://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8fd1d6db-2f91-447c-9771-3de271b16fd9
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6494/add-shopify-mandatory-compliance-webhooks-for-app-store-listing
Shopify requires all public apps to handle three GDPR compliance
webhooks before they can be listed on the App Store. Their automated
review checks for these endpoints and verifies that apps validate HMAC
signatures on incoming requests. We were failing both checks.
This PR adds a single webhook endpoint at `POST /webhooks/shopify` that
receives all three compliance events. When Shopify sends a webhook, it
signs the payload with our app's client secret and includes the
signature in the `X-Shopify-Hmac-SHA256` header. Our controller reads
the raw body, computes the expected HMAC-SHA256 digest, and rejects
mismatched requests with a 401.
Shopify identifies the event type through the `X-Shopify-Topic` header.
For `customers/data_request` and `customers/redact`, we simply
acknowledge with a 200—Chatwoot doesn't persist any Shopify customer
data. All order lookups happen as live API calls at query time. For
`shop/redact`, which Shopify sends after a merchant uninstalls the app,
we delete the integration hook for that shop domain and remove the
stored access token and configuration.
### How to test via Rails console
```
secret = GlobalConfigService.load('SHOPIFY_CLIENT_SECRET', nil)
body = '{"shop_domain":"test.myshopify.com"}'
valid_hmac = Base64.strict_encode64(OpenSSL::HMAC.digest('SHA256', secret, body))
```
#### Test 1: No HMAC → 401
```
app.post '/webhooks/shopify', params: body, headers: { 'Content-Type' => 'application/json', 'X-Shopify-Topic' => 'customers/data_request' }
app.response.code # => "401"
```
#### Test 2: Invalid HMAC → 401
```
app.post '/webhooks/shopify', params: body, headers: { 'Content-Type' => 'application/json', 'X-Shopify-Hmac-SHA256' => 'invalid', 'X-Shopify-Topic' => 'customers/data_request' }
app.response.code # => "401"
```
#### Test 3: Valid HMAC, customers/data_request → 200
```
app.post '/webhooks/shopify', params: body, headers: { 'Content-Type' => 'application/json', 'X-Shopify-Hmac-SHA256' => valid_hmac, 'X-Shopify-Topic' => 'customers/data_request' }
app.response.code # => "200"
```
#### Test 4: Valid HMAC, customers/redact → 200
```
app.post '/webhooks/shopify', params: body, headers: { 'Content-Type' => 'application/json', 'X-Shopify-Hmac-SHA256' => valid_hmac, 'X-Shopify-Topic' => 'customers/redact' }
app.response.code # => "200"
```
#### Test 5: Valid HMAC, shop/redact → 200 (deletes hook)
```
# First check if a hook exists for this domain:
Integrations::Hook.where(app_id: 'shopify', reference_id: 'test.myshopify.com').count
app.post '/webhooks/shopify', params: body, headers: { 'Content-Type' => 'application/json', 'X-Shopify-Hmac-SHA256' => valid_hmac, 'X-Shopify-Topic' => 'shop/redact' }
app.response.code # => "200"
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
This PR adds a new standalone `GET
/api/v2/accounts/:id/reports/outgoing_messages_count` endpoint that
returns outgoing message counts grouped by agent, team, inbox, or label.
The index is already added in production.
Adds a new reporting API that returns conversation counts grouped by
channel type and first response time buckets (0-1h, 1-4h, 4-8h, 8-24h,
24h+).
- GET /api/v2/accounts/:id/reports/first_response_time_distribution
- Uses SQL aggregation to handle large datasets efficiently
- Adds composite index on reporting_events for query performance
Tested on production workload.
Request: GET
`/api/v2/accounts/1/reports/first_response_time_distribution?since=<since>&until=<until>`
Response payload:
```
{
"Channel::WebWidget": {
"0-1h": 120,
"1-4h": 85,
"4-8h": 32,
"8-24h": 12,
"24h+": 3
},
"Channel::Email": {
"0-1h": 12,
"1-4h": 28,
"4-8h": 45,
"8-24h": 35,
"24h+": 10
},
"Channel::FacebookPage": {
"0-1h": 50,
"1-4h": 30,
"4-8h": 15,
"8-24h": 8,
"24h+": 2
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This PR added new API endpoint GET
/api/v2/accounts/:account_id/reports/inbox_label_matrix that returns
conversation counts grouped by inbox and label in a matrix format.
Supports optional filtering by date range, inbox_ids, and label_ids.
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
The existing /api health check endpoint creates a new Redis connection
on every request and checks both Redis and Postgres availability. During
peak traffic, this creates unnecessary load and can cause cascading
failures when either service is slow - instances get marked unhealthy,
traffic shifts to remaining instances, which then also fail health
checks.
The new /health endpoint:
- Returns immediately with 200 {"status":"woot"}
- Skips all middleware and authentication
- No Redis or Postgres dependency
- Suitable for health checks that only need to verify the web server is
responding
CSAT scores are helpful, but on their own they rarely tell the full
story. A drop in rating can come from delayed timelines, unclear
expectations, or simple misunderstandings, even when the issue itself
was handled correctly.
Review Notes for CSAT let admins/report manager roles add internal-only
context next to each CSAT response. This makes it easier to interpret
scores properly and focus on patterns and root causes, not just numbers.
<img width="2170" height="1680" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56df7fab-d0a7-4a94-95b9-e4c459ad33d5"
/>
### Why this matters
* Capture the real context behind individual CSAT ratings
* Clarify whether a low score points to a genuine service issue or a
process gap
* Spot recurring themes across conversations and teams
* Make CSAT reviews more useful for leadership reviews and
retrospectives
### How Review Notes work
**View CSAT responses**
Open the CSAT report to see overall metrics, rating distribution, and
individual responses.
**Add a Review Note**
For any CSAT entry, managers can add a Review Note directly below the
customer’s feedback.
**Document internal insights**
Use Review Notes to capture things like:
* Why a score was lower or higher than expected
* Patterns you are seeing across similar cases
* Observations around communication, timelines, or customer expectations
Review Notes are visible only to administrators and people with report
access only. We may expand visibility to agents in the future based on
feedback. However, customers never see them.
Each note clearly shows who added it and when, making it easy to review
context and changes over time.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for exporting conversation summary reports as CSV.
Previously, the Conversations report incorrectly showed an option to
download agent reports; this has now been fixed to export
conversation-level data instead.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6176/conversation-reports-export-button-exports-agent-reports-instead
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
<img width="1859" height="1154" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/419d26f4-fda9-4782-aea6-55ffad0c37ab"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This API gives you how many conversations exist per channel, broken down
by status in a given time period. The max time period is capped to 6
months for now.
**Input Params:**
- **since:** Unix timestamp (seconds) - start of date range
- **until:** Unix timestamp (seconds) - end of date range
**Response Payload:**
```json
{
"Channel::Sms": {
"resolved": 85,
"snoozed": 10,
"open": 5,
"pending": 5,
"total": 100
},
"Channel::Email": {
"resolved": 72,
"snoozed": 15,
"open": 13,
"pending": 13,
"total": 100
},
"Channel::WebWidget": {
"resolved": 90,
"snoozed": 7,
"open": 3,
"pending": 3,
"total": 100
}
}
```
**Definitons:**
resolved = Number of conversations created within the selected time
period that are currently marked as resolved.
snoozed = Number of conversations created within the selected time
period that are currently marked as snoozed.
pending = Number of conversations created within the selected time
period that are currently marked as pending.
open = Number of conversations created within the selected time period
that are currently open.
total = Total number of conversations created within the selected time
period, across all statuses.
fixes: #11834
This pull request introduces TikTok channel integration, enabling users
to connect and manage TikTok business accounts similarly to other
supported social channels. The changes span backend API endpoints,
authentication helpers, webhook handling, configuration, and frontend
components to support TikTok as a first-class channel.
**Key Notes**
* This integration is only compatible with TikTok Business Accounts
* Special permissions are required to access the TikTok [Business
Messaging
API](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832183871604753).
* The Business Messaging API is region-restricted and is currently
unavailable to users in the EU.
* Only TEXT, IMAGE, and POST_SHARE messages are currently supported due
to limitations in the TikTok Business Messaging API
* A message will be successfully sent only if it contains text alone or
one image attachment. Messages with multiple attachments or those
combining text and attachments will fail and receive a descriptive error
status.
* Messages sent directly from the TikTok App will be synced into the
system
* Initiating a new conversation from the system is not permitted due to
limitations from the TikTok Business Messaging API.
**Backend: TikTok Channel Integration**
* Added `Api::V1::Accounts::Tiktok::AuthorizationsController` to handle
TikTok OAuth authorization initiation, returning the TikTok
authorization URL.
* Implemented `Tiktok::CallbacksController` to handle TikTok OAuth
callback, process authorization results, create or update channel/inbox,
and handle errors or denied scopes.
* Added `Webhooks::TiktokController` to receive and verify TikTok
webhook events, including signature verification and event dispatching.
* Created `Tiktok::IntegrationHelper` module for JWT-based token
generation and verification for secure TikTok OAuth state management.
**Configuration and Feature Flags**
* Added TikTok app credentials (`TIKTOK_APP_ID`, `TIKTOK_APP_SECRET`) to
allowed configs and app config, and registered TikTok as a feature in
the super admin features YAML.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-5e46e1d248631a1147521477d84a54f8ba6846ea21c61eca5f70042d960467f4R43)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-8bf37a019cab1dedea458c437bd93e34af1d6e22b1672b1d43ef6eaa4dcb7732R69)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-123164bea29f3c096b0d018702b090d5ae670760c729141bd4169a36f5f5c1caR74-R79)
**Frontend: TikTok Channel UI and Messaging Support**
* Added `TiktokChannel` API client for frontend TikTok authorization
requests.
* Updated channel icon mappings and tests to include TikTok
(`Channel::Tiktok`).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-b852739ed45def61218d581d0de1ba73f213f55570aa5eec52aaa08f380d0e16R16)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-3cd3ae32e94ef85f1f2c4435abf0775cc0614fb37ee25d97945cd51573ef199eR64-R69)
* Enabled TikTok as a supported channel in contact forms, channel
widgets, and feature toggles.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-ec59c85e1403aaed1a7de35971fe16b7033d5cd763be590903ebf8f1ca25a010R47)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-ec59c85e1403aaed1a7de35971fe16b7033d5cd763be590903ebf8f1ca25a010R69)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R26-R29)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R51-R54)
[[5]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R68)
* Updated message meta logic to support TikTok-specific message statuses
(sent, delivered, read).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696R23)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L63-R65)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L81-R84)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L103-R107)
* Added support for embedded message attachments (e.g., TikTok embeds)
with a new `EmbedBubble` component and updated message rendering logic.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-c3d701caf27d9c31e200c6143c11a11b9d8826f78aa2ce5aa107470e6fdb9d7fR31)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-047859f9368a46d6d20177df7d6d623768488ecc38a5b1e284f958fad49add68R1-R19)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-c3d701caf27d9c31e200c6143c11a11b9d8826f78aa2ce5aa107470e6fdb9d7fR316)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-cbc85e7c4c8d56f2a847d0b01cd48ef36e5f87b43023bff0520fdfc707283085R52)
* Adjusted reply policy and UI messaging for TikTok's 48-hour reply
window.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-0d691f6a983bd89502f91253ecf22e871314545d1e3d3b106fbfc76bf6d8e1c7R208-R210)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-0d691f6a983bd89502f91253ecf22e871314545d1e3d3b106fbfc76bf6d8e1c7R224-R226)
These changes collectively enable end-to-end TikTok channel support,
from configuration and OAuth flow to webhook processing and frontend
message handling.
------------
# TikTok App Setup & Configuration
1. Grant access to the Business Messaging API
([Documentation](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832184145137922))
2. Set the app authorization redirect URL to
`https://FRONTEND_URL/tiktok/callback`
3. Update the installation config with TikTok App ID and Secret
4. Create a Business Messaging Webhook configuration and set the
callback url to `https://FRONTEND_URL/webhooks/tiktok`
([Documentation](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832190670631937))
. You can do this by calling
`Tiktok::AuthClient.update_webhook_callback` from rails console once you
finish Tiktok channel configuration in super admin ( will be automated
in future )
5. Enable TikTok channel feature in an account
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
## Description
- Replaces Stripe Checkout session flow with direct card charging for AI
credit top-ups
- Adds a two-step confirmation modal (select package → confirm purchase)
for better UX
- Creates Stripe invoice directly and charges the customer's default
payment method immediately
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Using the specs
- UI manual test cases
<img width="945" height="580" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/52bdad46-cd0e-4927-b13f-54c6b6353bcc"
/>
<img width="945" height="580" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/231bc7e9-41ac-440d-a93d-cba45a4d3e3e"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
## Description
Adds API endpoint to list companies with pagination, search, and
sorting.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5930/add-backend-routes-to-get-companies-result
Parent issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5928/add-companies-tab-to-dashboard
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Added comprehensive specs to
`spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb`:
- Pagination (25 per page, multiple pages)
- Search by name and domain (case-insensitive)
- Counter cache for contacts_count
- Account scoping
- Authorization
To reproduce:
```bash
bundle exec rspec spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb
bundle exec rubocop enterprise/app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller.rb
```
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
* add Company model with validations for name, domain, description and
avatar
* Add database migration fo
* Implement endpoints for company CRUD operations
* Add optional company relationship for contacts
* Add test for models, controllers, factories and policies
* Add authorization policies restricting delete to admins
* support JSON API responses
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes #(cw-5650)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tests are implemented using `RSpec`
```
$ bundle exec rails db:migrate
$ bundle exec rspec spec/models/company_spec.rb spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb
```
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5692/whatsapp-es-numbers-stuck-in-pending-due-to-premature-registration
### Problem
Multiple customers reported that their WhatsApp numbers remain stuck in
**Pending** in WhatsApp Manager even after successful onboarding.
- Our system triggers a **registration call**
(`/<PHONE_NUMBER_ID>/register`) as soon as the number is OTP verified.
- In many cases, Meta hasn’t finished **display name
review/provisioning**, so the call fails with:
```
code: 100, error_subcode: 2388001
error_user_title: "Cannot Create Certificate"
error_user_msg: "Your display name could not be processed. Please edit
your display name and try again."
```
- This leaves the number stuck in Pending, no messaging can start until
we manually retry registration.
- Some customers have reported being stuck in this state for **7+
days**.
### Root cause
- We only check `code_verification_status = VERIFIED` before attempting
registration.
- We **don’t wait** for display name provisioning (`name_status` /
`platform_type`) to be complete.
- As a result, registration fails prematurely and the number never
transitions out of Pending.
### Solution
#### 1. Health Status Monitoring
- Build a backend service to fetch **real-time health data** from Graph
API:
- `code_verification_status`
- `name_status` / `display_name_status`
- `platform_type`
- `throughput.level`
- `messaging_limit_tier`
- `quality_rating`
- Expose health data via API
(`/api/v1/accounts/:account_id/inboxes/:id/health`).
- Display this in the UI as an **Account Health tab** with clear badges
and direct links to WhatsApp Manager.
#### 2. Smarter Registration Logic
- Update `WebhookSetupService` to include a **dual-condition check**:
- Register if:
1. Phone is **not verified**, OR
2. Phone is **verified but provisioning incomplete** (`platform_type =
NOT_APPLICABLE`, `throughput.level = NOT_APPLICABLE`).
- Skip registration if number is already provisioned.
- Retry registration automatically when stuck.
- Provide a UI banner with complete registration button so customers can
retry without manual support.
### Screenshot
<img width="2292" height="1344" alt="CleanShot 2025-09-30 at 16 01
03@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1c417d2a-b11c-475e-b092-3c5671ee59a7"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
## Linear:
- https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/486
## Description
This PR implements Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) support for user
accounts, enhancing security by requiring a second form of verification
during login. The feature adds TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password)
authentication with QR code generation and backup codes for account
recovery.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added comprehensive RSpec tests for MFA controller functionality
- Tested MFA setup flow with QR code generation
- Verified OTP validation and backup code generation
- Tested login flow with MFA enabled/disabled
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This PR delivers the first slice of the voice channel: inbound call
handling. When a customer calls a configured voice
number, Chatwoot now creates a new conversation and shows a dedicated
call bubble in the UI. As the call progresses
(ringing, answered, completed), its status updates in real time in both
the conversation list and the call bubble, so
agents can instantly see what’s happening. This focuses on the inbound
flow and is part of breaking the larger voice
feature into smaller, functional, and testable units; further
enhancements will follow in subsequent PRs.
references: #11602 , #11481
## Testing
- Configure a Voice inbox in Chatwoot with your Twilio number.
- Place a call to that number.
- Verify a new conversation appears in the Voice inbox for the call.
- Open it and confirm a dedicated voice call message bubble is shown.
- Watch status update live (ringing/answered); hang up and see it change
to completed in both the bubble and conversation
list.
- to test missed call status, make sure to hangup the call before the
please wait while we connect you to an agent message plays
## Screens
<img width="400" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 3 11 25 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d6a1d2ff-2ded-47b7-9144-a9d898beb380"
/>
<img width="700" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 3 11 33 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c25e6a1e-a885-47f7-b3d7-c3e15eef18c7"
/>
<img width="700" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-03 at 3 11 57 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29e7366d-b1d4-4add-a062-4646d2bff435"
/>
<img width="442" height="255" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-04 at 11 55 01 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/703126f6-a448-49d9-9c02-daf3092cc7f9"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This PR adds the foundation for account-level SAML SSO configuration in
Chatwoot Enterprise. It introduces a new `AccountSamlSettings` model and
management API that allows accounts to configure their own SAML identity
providers independently, this also includes the certificate generation
flow
The implementation includes a new controller
(`Api::V1::Accounts::SamlSettingsController`) that provides CRUD
operations for SAML configuration
The feature is properly gated behind the 'saml' feature flag and
includes administrator-only authorization via Pundit policies.
## Linear reference:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4649/re-imagine-assignments
## Description
This PR introduces the foundation for Assignment V2 system by
implementing agent_capacity and their association with inboxes and
users.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Test Coverage:
- Controller specs for assignment policies CRUD operations
- Enterprise-specific specs for balanced assignment order
- Model specs for community/enterprise separation
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
## Linear reference:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4649/re-imagine-assignments
## Description
This PR introduces the foundation for Assignment V2 system by
implementing assignment policies and their association with inboxes.
Assignment policies allow configuring how conversations are distributed
among agents, with support for different assignment orders (round_robin
in community, balanced in enterprise) and conversation prioritization
strategies
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Test Coverage:
- Controller specs for assignment policies CRUD operations
- Enterprise-specific specs for balanced assignment order
- Model specs for community/enterprise separation
Manual Testing:
1. Create assignment policy: POST
/api/v1/accounts/{id}/assignment_policies
2. List policies: GET /api/v1/accounts/{id}/assignment_policies
3. Assign policy to inbox: POST
/api/v1/accounts/{id}/assignment_policies/{id}/inboxes
4. View inbox policy: GET
/api/v1/accounts/{id}/inboxes/{id}/assignment_policy
5. Verify community edition ignores "balanced" assignment order
6. Verify enterprise edition supports both "round_robin" and "balanced"
- testing the flows after enterprise folder deletion
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Fixes
[CW-4620](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4620/rethinking-custom-domains-in-chatwoot)
<img width="642" height="187" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-29 at 8 17 44 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ad2f5dac-4b27-4dce-93ca-6cbba74443fb"
/>
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
This PR adds support for automatic SSL issuance using Cloudflare when a
custom domain is updated.
- Introduced a cloudflare configuration. If present, the system will
attempt to issue an SSL certificate via Cloudflare whenever a custom
domain is added or changed.
- SSL verification is handled using an HTTP challenge.
- The job will store the HTTP challenge response provided by Cloudflare
and serve it under the /.well-known/cf path automatically.
How to test:
- Create a Cloudflare zone for your domain and copy the Zone ID.
- Generate a Cloudflare API token with the required SSL certificate
permissions.
- Set the Fallback Origin under SSL -> Custom HostName to the Chatwoot
installation.
- Add or update a custom domain and verify that the SSL certificate is
automatically issued.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Description
This PR introduces WhatsApp Embedded Signup functionality, enabling
users to connect their WhatsApp Business accounts through Meta's
streamlined OAuth flow without manual webhook configuration. This
significantly improves the user experience by automating the entire
setup process.
**Key Features:**
- Embedded signup flow using Facebook SDK and Meta's OAuth 2.0
- Automatic webhook registration and phone number configuration
- Enhanced provider selection UI with card-based design
- Real-time progress tracking during signup process
- Comprehensive error handling and user feedback
## Required Configuration
The following environment variables must be configured by administrators
before this feature can be used:
Super Admin Configuration (via
super_admin/app_config?config=whatsapp_embedded)
- `WHATSAPP_APP_ID`: The Facebook App ID for WhatsApp Business API
integration
- `WHATSAPP_CONFIGURATION_ID`: The Configuration ID for WhatsApp
Embedded Signup flow (obtained from Meta Developer Portal)
- `WHATSAPP_APP_SECRET`: The App Secret for WhatsApp Embedded Signup
flow (required for token exchange)
## How Has This Been Tested?
#### Backend Tests (RSpec):
- Authentication validation for embedded signup endpoints
- Authorization code validation and error handling
- Missing business parameter validation
- Proper response format for configuration endpoint
- Unauthorized access prevention
#### Manual Test Cases:
- Complete embedded signup flow (happy path)
- Provider selection UI navigation
- Facebook authentication popup handling
- Error scenarios (cancelled auth, invalid business data, API failures)
- Configuration presence/absence behavior
## Related Screenshots:
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-2131/spec-for-whatsapp-cloud-channels-sign-in-with-facebook
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
- Add a dummy link for account users page that redirect back to user
page
- move common account user form in user and account super admin pages to
a partial
fixes: #10757
- Add API support for creating a thread
- Add API support for creating a message
- Remove uuid from thread (no longer required, we will use existing
websocket connection to send messages)
- Update message_type to a column (user, assistant, assistant_thinking)
The agents can see the previous conversations with the copilot if needed
with this change. We would have to cleanup the data after a while. For
now, that is not considered.
This PR adds:
- A new model for copilot_threads (intentionally named thread instead of
conversation to avoid confusion), copilot_messages
- Add the controller to fetch previous threads and messages.
