# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes the crash that occurred when inserting canned responses
containing **autolinks** (e.g. `<https://example.com>`) into reply
channels that **do not support links**, such as **Twilio SMS**.
### Steps to reproduce
1. Create a canned response with an autolink, for example:
`<https://example.com>`.
2. Open a conversation in a channel that does not support links (e.g.
SMS).
3. Insert the canned response into the reply box.
### Cause
* Currently, only standard markdown links (`[text](url)`) are handled
when stripping unsupported formats from canned responses.
* Autolinks (`<https://example.com>`) are not handled during this
process.
* As a result, **Error: Token type link_open not supported by Markdown
parser**
### Solution
* Extended the markdown link parsing logic to explicitly handle
**autolinks** in addition to standard markdown links.
* When a canned response containing an autolink is inserted into a reply
box for a channel that does not support links (e.g. SMS), the angle
brackets (`< >`) are stripped.
* The autolink is safely pasted as **plain text URL**, preventing parser
errors and editor crashes.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6256/error-token-type-link-open-not-supported-by-markdown-parser
Sentry issues
[[1](https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/7103543778/?environment=production&project=4507182691975168&query=is%3Aunresolved%20markdown&referrer=issue-stream)],
[[2](https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/7104325962/?environment=production&project=4507182691975168&query=is%3Aunresolved%20markdown&referrer=issue-stream
)]
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
1. This PR is an enhancement to
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13045
It strips unsupported formatting from **message signatures** based on
each channel’s formatting capabilities defined in the `FORMATTING`
config
2. Remove usage of plain editor in Compose new conversation modal
Only the following signature elements are considered:
<strong>bold (<code inline="">strong</code>), italic (<code
inline="">em</code>), links (<code inline="">link</code>), images (<code
inline="">image</code>)</strong>.</p>
Any formatting not supported by the target channel is automatically
removed before the signature is appended.
<h3>Channel-wise Signature Formatting Support</h3>
Channel | Keeps in Signature | Strips from Signature
-- | -- | --
Email | bold, italic, links, images | —
WebWidget | bold, italic, links, images | —
API | bold, italic | links, images
WhatsApp | bold, italic | links, images
Telegram | bold, italic, links | images
Facebook | bold, italic | links, images
Instagram | bold, italic | links, images
Line | bold, italic | links, images
SMS | — | everything
Twilio SMS | — | everything
Twitter/X | — | everything
<hr>
<h3>📝 Note</h3>
<blockquote>
<p>Message signatures only support <strong>bold, italic, links, and
images</strong>.<br>
Other formatting options available in the editor (lists, code blocks,
strike-through, etc.) do <strong>not apply</strong> to signatures and
are ignored.</p>
</blockquote>
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/d325ab86ca514c6d8f90dfe72a8928dd
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes,
1. **Issue with canned response insertion** - Canned responses with
formatting (bold, italic, code, lists, etc.) were not being inserted
into channels that don't support that formatting.
Now unsupported markdown syntax is automatically stripped based on the
channel's schema before insertion.
2. **Make image node optional** - Images are now stripped while paste.
9e269fca04
3. Enable **bold** and _italic_ for API channel
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6091/editor-breaks-when-inserting-canned-response
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/9a5215dfef2949fcaa3871f51bdec4bb
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes,
1. **Channel-specific formatting and menu options** for the rich reply
editor.
2. **Removal of the plain reply editor** and full **standardization** on
the rich reply editor across all channels.
3. **Fix for multiple canned responses insertion:**
* **Before:** The plain editor only allowed inserting canned responses
at the beginning of a message, making it impossible to combine multiple
canned responses in a single reply. This caused inconsistent behavior
across the app.
* **Solution:** Replaced the plain reply editor with the rich
(ProseMirror) editor to ensure a unified experience. Agents can now
insert multiple canned responses at any cursor position.
4. **Floating editor menu** for the reply box to improve accessibility
and overall user experience.
5. **New Strikethrough formatting option** added to the editor menu.
---
**Editor repo PR**:
https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/36
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/12517,
[CW-5924](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5924/standardize-the-editor),
[CW-5679](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5679/allow-inserting-multiple-canned-responses-in-a-single-message)
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
**Dark**
<img width="850" height="345" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/47748e6c-380f-44a3-9e3b-c27e0c830bd0"
/>
**Light**
<img width="850" height="345" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6746cf32-bf63-4280-a5bd-bbd42c3cbe84"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Vinay Keerthi <11478411+stonecharioteer@users.noreply.github.com>
Due to the pattern `**/specs/*.spec.js` defined in CircleCI, none of the
frontend spec in the folders such as
`specs/<domain-name>/getters.spec.js` were not executed in Circle CI.
This PR fixes the issue, along with the following changes:
- Use vitest instead of jest
- Remove jest dependancies
- Update tests to work with vitest
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
