Adds Skooma-based OpenAPI validation so SDK-facing request specs can
assert that documented request and response contracts match real Rails
behavior. This also upgrades the spec to OpenAPI 3.1 and fixes contract
drift uncovered while validating core application and platform
resources.
Closes
None
Why
We want CI to catch OpenAPI drift before it reaches SDK consumers. While
wiring validation in, this PR surfaced several mismatches between the
documented contract and what the Rails endpoints actually accept or
return.
What this change does
- Adds Skooma-backed OpenAPI validation to the request spec flow and a
dedicated OpenAPI validation spec.
- Migrates nullable schema definitions to OpenAPI 3.1-compatible unions.
- Updates core SDK-facing schemas and payloads across accounts,
contacts, conversations, inboxes, messages, teams, reporting events, and
platform account resources.
- Documents concrete runtime cases that were previously missing or
inaccurate, including nested `profile` update payloads, multipart avatar
uploads, required profile update bodies, nullable inbox feature flags,
and message sender types that include both `Captain::Assistant` and
senderless activity-style messages.
- Regenerates the committed Swagger JSON and tag-group artifacts used by
CI sync checks.
Validation
- `bundle exec rake swagger:build`
- `bundle exec rspec spec/swagger/openapi_spec.rb`
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Updates the public swagger spec to be OpenAPI 3.0.4 compliant. Regarding
#7893, I'm investigating the use of
[oas_rails](https://github.com/a-chacon/oas_rails) to auto-generate the
documentation along with correct expected payloads.
Mostly fixes#10531, related to #7893
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Copied spec into swagger editor, reviewed outputs:
Note that this shows two errors with the `DELETE` endpoints as
technically these should not have a `requestBody` - in which case we
should be making use of another HTTP verb or another endpoint.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Daniel Jimenez <devildan.knex@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Jimenez <daniel.jimenez@spark64.com>
