# Pull Request Template
## Description
Adds custom tool support to v1
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
<img width="1816" height="958" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 37 33@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2777a953-8b65-4a2d-88ec-39f395b3fb47"
/>
<img width="378" height="488" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 38 18@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f6973c99-efd0-40e4-90fe-4472a2f63cea"
/>
<img width="1884" height="1452" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-24 at 11 38
32@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fba4fc4-0c33-46da-888a-52ec6bad6130"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
This change blocks Help Center access for default/Hacker-plan accounts
and closes the downgrade gap that could leave `help_center` enabled
after a subscription falls back to the default cloud plan.
Fixes: none
Closes: none
## Why
Default-plan accounts should not be able to access the Help Center, but
the downgrade fallback path only reset the plan name and did not
reconcile premium feature flags. That meant some accounts could keep
`help_center` enabled even after landing back on the Hacker/default
plan.
## What this change does
- blocks Help Center portal and article access for default/Hacker-plan
accounts
- reconciles premium feature flags when a subscription falls back to the
default cloud plan, so `help_center` is disabled immediately instead of
waiting for a later webhook
- preserves existing account `custom_attributes` during Stripe customer
recreation instead of overwriting them
- adds Enterprise coverage for the default-plan access checks on hosted
and custom-domain Help Center routes
- fixes the public access check to use the resolved portal object so
blocked requests return the intended response instead of raising an
error
## Validation
1. Create or use an account on the default/Hacker cloud plan with an
active portal.
2. Visit the portal home page and a published article on both the
Chatwoot-hosted URL and a configured custom domain.
3. Confirm the Help Center is blocked for that account.
4. Downgrade a paid account back to the default/Hacker plan through the
Stripe webhook flow.
5. Confirm `help_center` is disabled right after the downgrade fallback
is processed and the account can no longer access the Help Center.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## PR#1: Reporting events rollup — model and write path
Reporting queries currently hit the `reporting_events` table directly.
This works, but the table grows linearly with event volume, and
aggregation queries (counts, averages over date ranges) get
progressively slower as accounts age.
This PR introduces a pre-aggregated `reporting_events_rollups` table
that stores daily per-metric, per-dimension (account/agent/inbox)
totals. The write path is intentionally decoupled from the read path —
rollup rows are written inline from the event listener via upsert, and a
backfill service exists to rebuild historical data from raw events.
Nothing reads from this table yet.
The write path activates when an account has a `reporting_timezone` set
(new account setting). The `reporting_events_rollup` feature flag
controls only the future read path, not writes — so rollup data
accumulates silently once timezone is configured. A `MetricRegistry`
maps raw event names to rollup column semantics in one place, keeping
the write and (future) read paths aligned.
### What changed
- Migration for `reporting_events_rollups` with a unique composite index
for upsert
- `ReportingEventsRollup` model
- `reporting_timezone` account setting with IANA timezone validation
- `MetricRegistry` — single source of truth for event-to-metric mappings
- `RollupService` — real-time upsert from event listener
- `BackfillService` — rebuilds rollups for a given account + date from
raw events
- Rake tasks for interactive backfill and timezone setup
- `reporting_events_rollup` feature flag (disabled by default)
### How to test
1. Set a `reporting_timezone` on an account
(`Account.first.update!(reporting_timezone: 'Asia/Kolkata')`)
2. Resolve a conversation or trigger a first response
3. Check `ReportingEventsRollup.where(account_id: ...)` — rows should
appear
4. Run backfill: `bundle exec rake reporting_events_rollup:backfill` and
verify historical data populates
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This updates the Traditional Chinese (`zh_TW`) locale coverage across
Chatwoot so the app no longer falls back to English for missing backend,
dashboard, widget, and survey strings.
## How to test
1. Start Chatwoot locally and switch the UI locale to Traditional
Chinese (`zh_TW`).
2. Walk through the main product areas: dashboard, settings, inbox
management, help center, automations, reports, widget, and survey flows.
3. Confirm the UI surfaces translated Traditional Chinese copy instead
of English fallbacks.
4. Spot-check newly added locale surfaces such as secure password
messaging and snooze UI copy.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Translate all English strings to Korean across 41 frontend locale files
and 2 backend locale files. Add structurally missing keys and translate
existing keys that were left in English.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
captain decides if conversation should be resolved or open
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/AI-91/make-captain-resolution-time-configurable
Update: Added 2 entries in reporting events:
`conversation_captain_handoff` and `conversation_captain_resolved`
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
LLM call decides that conversation is resolved, drops a private note
<img width="1228" height="438" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fb2cf1e9-4b2b-458b-a1e2-45c53d6a0158"
/>
LLM call decides conversation is still open as query was not resolved
<img width="1215" height="573" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d1d5322-f567-487e-954e-11ab0798d11c"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Adds a new built-in tool that allows Captain scenarios to resolve
conversations programmatically. This enables automated workflows like
the misdirected contact deflector to close conversations after handling
them, while still allowing human review via label filtering.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
tested by mentioning it to be used in captain v2 scenario
<img width="1180" height="828" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e70baf96-0c70-407e-af2c-328500ac5434"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Tanmay Deep Sharma <32020192+tds-1@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
The current password reset endpoint returns different HTTP status codes
and messages depending on whether the email exists in the system (200
for existing emails, 404 for non-existing ones). This allows attackers
to enumerate valid email addresses via the password reset form.
## Changes
### `app/controllers/devise_overrides/passwords_controller.rb`
- Removed the `if/else` branch that returned different responses based
on email existence
- Now always returns a generic `200 OK` response with the same message
regardless of whether the email exists
- Uses safe navigation operator (`&.`) to send reset instructions only
if the user exists
### `config/locales/en.yml`
- Consolidated `reset_password_success` and `reset_password_failure`
into a single generic `reset_password` key
- New message does not reveal whether the email exists in the system
## Security Impact
- **Before**: An attacker could determine if an email was registered by
observing the HTTP status code (200 vs 404) and response message
- **After**: All requests receive the same 200 response with a generic
message, preventing user enumeration
This follows [OWASP guidelines for authentication error
messages](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Authentication_Cheat_Sheet.html#authentication-responses).
Fixes#13527
CSAT scores are helpful, but on their own they rarely tell the full
story. A drop in rating can come from delayed timelines, unclear
expectations, or simple misunderstandings, even when the issue itself
was handled correctly.
Review Notes for CSAT let admins/report manager roles add internal-only
context next to each CSAT response. This makes it easier to interpret
scores properly and focus on patterns and root causes, not just numbers.
<img width="2170" height="1680" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56df7fab-d0a7-4a94-95b9-e4c459ad33d5"
/>
### Why this matters
* Capture the real context behind individual CSAT ratings
* Clarify whether a low score points to a genuine service issue or a
process gap
* Spot recurring themes across conversations and teams
* Make CSAT reviews more useful for leadership reviews and
retrospectives
### How Review Notes work
**View CSAT responses**
Open the CSAT report to see overall metrics, rating distribution, and
individual responses.
**Add a Review Note**
For any CSAT entry, managers can add a Review Note directly below the
customer’s feedback.
**Document internal insights**
Use Review Notes to capture things like:
* Why a score was lower or higher than expected
* Patterns you are seeing across similar cases
* Observations around communication, timelines, or customer expectations
Review Notes are visible only to administrators and people with report
access only. We may expand visibility to agents in the future based on
feedback. However, customers never see them.
Each note clearly shows who added it and when, making it easy to review
context and changes over time.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for exporting conversation summary reports as CSV.
Previously, the Conversations report incorrectly showed an option to
download agent reports; this has now been fixed to export
conversation-level data instead.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6176/conversation-reports-export-button-exports-agent-reports-instead
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
<img width="1859" height="1154" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/419d26f4-fda9-4782-aea6-55ffad0c37ab"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This API gives you how many conversations exist per channel, broken down
by status in a given time period. The max time period is capped to 6
months for now.
**Input Params:**
- **since:** Unix timestamp (seconds) - start of date range
- **until:** Unix timestamp (seconds) - end of date range
**Response Payload:**
```json
{
"Channel::Sms": {
"resolved": 85,
"snoozed": 10,
"open": 5,
"pending": 5,
"total": 100
},
"Channel::Email": {
"resolved": 72,
"snoozed": 15,
"open": 13,
"pending": 13,
"total": 100
},
"Channel::WebWidget": {
"resolved": 90,
"snoozed": 7,
"open": 3,
"pending": 3,
"total": 100
}
}
```
**Definitons:**
resolved = Number of conversations created within the selected time
period that are currently marked as resolved.
snoozed = Number of conversations created within the selected time
period that are currently marked as snoozed.
pending = Number of conversations created within the selected time
period that are currently marked as pending.
open = Number of conversations created within the selected time period
that are currently open.
total = Total number of conversations created within the selected time
period, across all statuses.
## Description
Implements comprehensive search functionality with advanced filtering
capabilities for Chatwoot (Linear: CW-5956).
This PR adds:
1. **Time-based filtering** for contacts and conversations (SQL-based
search)
2. **Advanced message search** with multiple filters
(OpenSearch/Elasticsearch-based)
- **`from` filter**: Filter messages by sender (format: `contact:42` or
`agent:5`)
- **`inbox_id` filter**: Filter messages by specific inbox
- **Time range filters**: Filter messages using `since` and `until`
parameters (Unix timestamps in seconds)
- **90-day limit enforcement**: Automatically limits searches to the
last 90 days to prevent performance issues
The implementation extends the existing `Enterprise::SearchService`
module for advanced features and adds time filtering to the base
`SearchService` for SQL-based searches.
## API Documentation
### Base URL
All search endpoints follow this pattern:
```
GET /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/search/{resource}
```
### Authentication
All requests require authentication headers:
```
api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN
```
---
## 1. Search All Resources
**Endpoint:** `GET /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/search`
Returns results from all searchable resources (contacts, conversations,
messages, articles).
### Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description | Required |
|-----------|------|-------------|----------|
| `q` | string | Search query | Yes |
| `page` | integer | Page number (15 items per page) | No |
| `since` | integer | Unix timestamp (contacts/conversations only) | No
|
| `until` | integer | Unix timestamp (contacts/conversations only) | No
|
### Example Request
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search?q=customer" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
### Example Response
```json
{
"payload": {
"contacts": [...],
"conversations": [...],
"messages": [...],
"articles": [...]
}
}
```
---
## 2. Search Contacts
**Endpoint:** `GET /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/search/contacts`
Search contacts by name, email, phone number, or identifier with
optional time filtering.
### Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description | Required |
|-----------|------|-------------|----------|
| `q` | string | Search query | Yes |
| `page` | integer | Page number (15 items per page) | No |
| `since` | integer | Unix timestamp - filter by last_activity_at | No |
| `until` | integer | Unix timestamp - filter by last_activity_at | No |
### Example Requests
**Basic search:**
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/contacts?q=john" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search contacts active in the last 7 days:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-7d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/contacts?q=john&since=${SINCE}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search contacts active between 30 and 7 days ago:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-30d +%s)
UNTIL=$(date -v-7d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/contacts?q=john&since=${SINCE}&until=${UNTIL}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
### Example Response
```json
{
"payload": {
"contacts": [
{
"id": 42,
"email": "john@example.com",
"name": "John Doe",
"phone_number": "+1234567890",
"identifier": "user_123",
"additional_attributes": {},
"created_at": 1701234567
}
]
}
}
```
---
## 3. Search Conversations
**Endpoint:** `GET /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/search/conversations`
Search conversations by display ID, contact name, email, phone number,
or identifier with optional time filtering.
### Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description | Required |
|-----------|------|-------------|----------|
| `q` | string | Search query | Yes |
| `page` | integer | Page number (15 items per page) | No |
| `since` | integer | Unix timestamp - filter by last_activity_at | No |
| `until` | integer | Unix timestamp - filter by last_activity_at | No |
### Example Requests
**Basic search:**
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/conversations?q=billing" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search conversations active in the last 24 hours:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-1d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/conversations?q=billing&since=${SINCE}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search conversations from last month:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-30d +%s)
UNTIL=$(date +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/conversations?q=billing&since=${SINCE}&until=${UNTIL}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
### Example Response
```json
{
"payload": {
"conversations": [
{
"id": 123,
"display_id": 45,
"inbox_id": 1,
"status": "open",
"messages": [...],
"meta": {...}
}
]
}
}
```
---
## 4. Search Messages (Advanced)
**Endpoint:** `GET /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/search/messages`
Advanced message search with multiple filters powered by
OpenSearch/Elasticsearch.
### Prerequisites
- OpenSearch/Elasticsearch must be running (`OPENSEARCH_URL` env var
configured)
- Account must have `advanced_search` feature flag enabled
- Messages must be indexed in OpenSearch
### Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description | Required |
|-----------|------|-------------|----------|
| `q` | string | Search query | Yes |
| `page` | integer | Page number (15 items per page) | No |
| `from` | string | Filter by sender: `contact:{id}` or `agent:{id}` |
No |
| `inbox_id` | integer | Filter by specific inbox ID | No |
| `since` | integer | Unix timestamp - searches from this time (max 90
days ago) | No |
| `until` | integer | Unix timestamp - searches until this time | No |
### Important Notes
- **90-Day Limit**: If `since` is not provided, searches default to the
last 90 days
- If `since` exceeds 90 days, returns `422` error: "Search is limited to
the last 90 days"
- All time filters use message `created_at` timestamp
### Example Requests
**Basic message search:**
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search messages from a specific contact:**
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&from=contact:42" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search messages from a specific agent:**
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&from=agent:5" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search messages in a specific inbox:**
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&inbox_id=3" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search messages from the last 7 days:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-7d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&since=${SINCE}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Search messages between specific dates:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-30d +%s)
UNTIL=$(date -v-7d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&since=${SINCE}&until=${UNTIL}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Combine all filters:**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-14d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&from=contact:42&inbox_id=3&since=${SINCE}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
**Attempt to search beyond 90 days (returns error):**
```bash
SINCE=$(date -v-120d +%s)
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/messages?q=refund&since=${SINCE}" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
### Example Response (Success)
```json
{
"payload": {
"messages": [
{
"id": 789,
"content": "I need a refund for my purchase",
"message_type": "incoming",
"created_at": 1701234567,
"conversation_id": 123,
"inbox_id": 3,
"sender": {
"id": 42,
"type": "contact"
}
}
]
}
}
```
### Example Response (90-day limit exceeded)
```json
{
"error": "Search is limited to the last 90 days"
}
```
**Status Code:** `422 Unprocessable Entity`
---
## 5. Search Articles
**Endpoint:** `GET /api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/search/articles`
Search help center articles by title or content.
### Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Description | Required |
|-----------|------|-------------|----------|
| `q` | string | Search query | Yes |
| `page` | integer | Page number (15 items per page) | No |
### Example Request
```bash
curl -X GET "https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/1/search/articles?q=installation" \
-H "api_access_token: YOUR_ACCESS_TOKEN"
```
### Example Response
```json
{
"payload": {
"articles": [
{
"id": 456,
"title": "Installation Guide",
"slug": "installation-guide",
"portal_slug": "help",
"account_id": 1,
"category_name": "Getting Started",
"status": "published",
"updated_at": 1701234567
}
]
}
}
```
---
## Technical Implementation
### SQL-Based Search (Contacts, Conversations, Articles)
- Uses PostgreSQL `ILIKE` queries by default
- Optional GIN index support via `search_with_gin` feature flag for
better performance
- Time filtering uses `last_activity_at` for contacts/conversations
- Returns paginated results (15 per page)
### Advanced Search (Messages)
- Powered by OpenSearch/Elasticsearch via Searchkick gem
- Requires `OPENSEARCH_URL` environment variable
- Requires `advanced_search` account feature flag
- Enforces 90-day lookback limit via
`Limits::MESSAGE_SEARCH_TIME_RANGE_LIMIT_DAYS`
- Validates inbox access permissions before filtering
- Returns paginated results (15 per page)
---
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] Enhancement (improves existing functionality)
---
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Unit Tests
- **Contact Search Tests**: 3 new test cases for time filtering
(`since`, `until`, combined)
- **Conversation Search Tests**: 3 new test cases for time filtering
- **Message Search Tests**: 10+ test cases covering:
- Individual filters (`from`, `inbox_id`, time range)
- Combined filters
- Permission validation for inbox access
- Feature flag checks
- 90-day limit enforcement
- Error handling for exceeded time limits
### Test Commands
```bash
# Run all search controller tests
bundle exec rspec spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/search_controller_spec.rb
# Run search service tests (includes enterprise specs)
bundle exec rspec spec/services/search_service_spec.rb
```
### Manual Testing Setup
A rake task is provided to create 50,000 test messages across multiple
inboxes:
```bash
# 1. Create test data
bundle exec rake search:setup_test_data
# 2. Start OpenSearch
mise elasticsearch-start
# 3. Reindex messages
rails runner "Message.search_index.import Message.all"
# 4. Enable feature flag
rails runner "Account.first.enable_features('advanced_search')"
# 5. Test via API or Rails console
```
---
## Checklist
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (this PR
description)
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---
## Additional Notes
### Requirements
- **OpenSearch/Elasticsearch**: Required for advanced message search
- Set `OPENSEARCH_URL` environment variable
- Example: `export OPENSEARCH_URL=http://localhost:9200`
- **Feature Flags**:
- `advanced_search`: Account-level flag for message advanced search
- `search_with_gin` (optional): Account-level flag for GIN-based SQL
search
### Performance Considerations
- 90-day limit prevents expensive long-range queries on large datasets
- GIN indexes recommended for high-volume search on SQL-based resources
- OpenSearch/Elasticsearch provides faster full-text search for messages
### Breaking Changes
- None. All new parameters are optional and backward compatible.
### Frontend Integration
- Frontend PR tracking advanced search UI will consume these endpoints
- Time range pickers should convert JavaScript `Date` to Unix timestamps
(seconds)
- Date conversion: `Math.floor(date.getTime() / 1000)`
### Error Handling
- Invalid `from` parameter format is silently ignored (filter not
applied)
- Time range exceeding 90 days returns `422` with error message
- Missing `q` parameter returns `422` (existing behavior)
- Unauthorized inbox access is filtered out (no error, just excluded
from results)
---------
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Previously, attachments relied only on blob_id, which made it possible
to attach blobs across accounts by enumerating IDs. We now require both
blob_id and blob_key, add cross-account validation to prevent blob
reuse, and centralize the logic in a shared BlobOwnershipValidation
concern.
It also fixes a frontend bug where mixed-type action params (number +
string) were incorrectly dropped, causing attachment uploads to fail.
Text in hebrew was broken and incomplete - i have completed the
translation and fixed some annoying terms for better understanding and
user experience.
## Description
- Replaces Stripe Checkout session flow with direct card charging for AI
credit top-ups
- Adds a two-step confirmation modal (select package → confirm purchase)
for better UX
- Creates Stripe invoice directly and charges the customer's default
payment method immediately
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Using the specs
- UI manual test cases
<img width="945" height="580" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/52bdad46-cd0e-4927-b13f-54c6b6353bcc"
/>
<img width="945" height="580" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/231bc7e9-41ac-440d-a93d-cba45a4d3e3e"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
## Description
Adds API endpoint to list companies with pagination, search, and
sorting.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5930/add-backend-routes-to-get-companies-result
Parent issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5928/add-companies-tab-to-dashboard
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Added comprehensive specs to
`spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb`:
- Pagination (25 per page, multiple pages)
- Search by name and domain (case-insensitive)
- Counter cache for contacts_count
- Account scoping
- Authorization
To reproduce:
```bash
bundle exec rspec spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb
bundle exec rubocop enterprise/app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller.rb
```
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
## Description
Modified the phone number validation in Whatsapp::ChannelCreationService
to check for duplicate phone numbers across ALL accounts, not just
within the current account.
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added test coverage for cross-account phone number validation
- Using actual UI flow
<img width="1493" height="532" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/67d2bb99-2eb9-4115-8d56-449e4785e0d8"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Changelog
When an agent bot webhook fails, we now flip any pending conversation
back to an open state so a human agent can pick
it up immediately. There will be an clear activity message giving the
team clear visibility into what went
wrong. This keeps customers from getting stuck in limbo when their
connected bot goes offline.
# Testing instructions
1. Initial setup: Create an agent bot with a working webhook URL and
connect it to a test inbox. Send a message from a
contact (e.g., via the widget) so a conversation is created; it should
enter the Pending state while the bot handles
the reply.
2. Introduce failure: Edit that agent bot and swap the webhook URL for a
dummy endpoint that will fail. Have the same
contact send another message in the existing conversation. Because the
webhook call now fails, the conversation should flip from Pending back
to Open, making it visible to agents. Also verify the activity message
3. New conversation check: With the dummy URL still in place, start a
brand-new conversation from a contact. When the
bot tries (and fails) to respond, confirm that the conversation appears
immediately as Open rather than remaining Pending. Also the activity
message is visible
4. Subsequent messages in open conversations will show no change
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
* add Company model with validations for name, domain, description and
avatar
* Add database migration fo
* Implement endpoints for company CRUD operations
* Add optional company relationship for contacts
* Add test for models, controllers, factories and policies
* Add authorization policies restricting delete to admins
* support JSON API responses
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes #(cw-5650)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tests are implemented using `RSpec`
```
$ bundle exec rails db:migrate
$ bundle exec rspec spec/models/company_spec.rb spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb
```
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR increases the custom filter limit from 50 to 1000 per user
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
<img width="1264" height="71" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e12667bb-147c-4115-b8a8-9113fca471db"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Linear:
- https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/486
## Description
This PR implements Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) support for user
accounts, enhancing security by requiring a second form of verification
during login. The feature adds TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password)
authentication with QR code generation and backup codes for account
recovery.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added comprehensive RSpec tests for MFA controller functionality
- Tested MFA setup flow with QR code generation
- Verified OTP validation and backup code generation
- Tested login flow with MFA enabled/disabled
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
