## Summary
This PR enables the **Participating** conversation view in the main
sidebar and keeps the behavior aligned with existing conversation views.
## What changed
- Added **Participating** under Conversations in the new sidebar.
- Added a guard in conversation realtime `addConversation` flow so
generic `conversation.created` events are not injected while the user is
on Participating view.
- Added participating route mapping in conversation-list redirect helper
so list redirects resolve correctly to `/participating/conversations`.
## Scope notes
- Kept changes minimal and consistent with current `develop` behavior.
- No additional update-event filtering was added beyond what existing
views already do.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes, block inline images in message signatures and prevent
auto signature insertion when editor is disabled.
- Strip inline base64 images from signature on save and show warning
message
- Add `INLINE_IMAGE_WARNING` translation key for signature inline image
removal notification
- Add disabled check to `addSignature()` to prevent signature insertion
when editor is disabled
- Add `isEditorDisabled` checks to signature toggle logic in
`toggleSignatureForDraft()`, `replaceText()`, and `clearMessage()`
- Remove unused `replaceText` from the codebase, which belongs to old
`textarea` editor
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6588/the-browser-hangs-when-the-message-signature-contains-inline-image
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/fb556b46a12a4308a737eed732d5ed73
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes
1. Messages being trimmed to the default 1024 limit in `trimContent`
method, instead of channel-specific limits for drafts and AI tasks.
2. Telegram messages are allowed up to 10,000 characters in config, but
the API supports only 4096, causing failures for oversized messages.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6694/captain-ai-rewrite-tasks-truncate-draft-to-1024-chars-trimcontenthttps://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13919
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
**Before**
https://www.loom.com/share/00e9d6b4d19247febf35dffa99da3805
**After**
https://www.loom.com/share/c4900e9effc345c79bcd8a5aa1ee277b
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support to auto-focus the editor when clicking reply to
this message, the editor now automatically receives focus so users can
start typing immediately.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6661/typing-box-not-focused-after-clicking-reply-to-message
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screencast
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c5e77055-3f68-4ad8-934e-cfc465166e8a
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
CJK language users (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, etc.) use IME where Enter
confirms character selection. AI input components were intercepting
Enter unconditionally, making them unusable for IME users.
Add `event.isComposing` check to CopilotEditor, CopilotInput, and
AssistantPlayground so Enter during active IME composition is ignored.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Before:
Add a Japenese keyboard, then go to AI follow-ups, type some word,
selecting it with enter submits the follow up. So CJK users cannot use
follow-ups.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/53517432-d97b-47fc-a802-81675e31d5c9
After:
Type a word, press enter to choose it, press enter again to unselect it
and enter again to send
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6c2a420b-7ee6-4c71-82a6-d9f1d7bbf31a
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add a new conversation sort option "Priority: Highest first, Created:
Oldest first" that sorts by priority descending (urgent > high > medium
> low > none) with created_at ascending as the tiebreaker
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR replaces `vue-virtual-scroller` with
[`virtua`](https://github.com/inokawa/virtua/#benchmark) for the
conversation list virtualization.
### Changes
- Replace `vue-virtual-scroller`
(`DynamicScroller`/`DynamicScrollerItem`) with `virtua`'s `Virtualizer`
component
- Remove `IntersectionObserver`-based infinite scroll in favor of
`Virtualizer`'s `@scroll` event with offset-based bottom detection
- Remove `useEventListener` scroll binding and
`intersectionObserverOptions` computed
- Simplify item rendering — no more `DynamicScrollerItem` wrapper or
`size-dependencies` tracking; `virtua` measures items automatically
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes,
1. Adjusting the inbox settings page layout width from 3xl to 4xl for
the collaborators, configuration, and bot configuration sections.
2. Adding a dynamic max-width for inbox settings banners based on the
selected tab.
3. Making the sender name preview layout responsive.
4. Reordering automation rule row buttons so Clone appears before
Delete.
5. Update the Gmail icon ratio.
6. Fix height issues with team/inbox pages
7. The delete button changes to red on hover
8. Add border to conversation header when no dashboard apps present
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR updates settings page UI
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds support for removing labels from the conversation card
context menu. Assigned labels now show a checkmark, and clicking an
already-selected label will remove it.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6400/allow-removing-labels-directly-from-the-right-click-menuhttps://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13367
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Screencast**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4e3a6080-a67d-4851-9d10-d8dbf3ceeb04
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
Adds missing analytics instrumentation for the editor AI funnel so we
can measure end-to-end usage and outcome quality.
### What was added
- Captain: Editor AI menu opened
- Captain: Generation failed
- Captain: AI-assisted message sent
### Behavior covered
- Tracks AI button click + menu open from both entry points:
- top panel sparkle button
- inline editor copilot button
- Tracks generation failures (initial + follow-up stages).
- Tracks whether accepted AI content was sent as-is or edited before
send.
### Notes
- Applies to editor Captain accept/send flow
(rewrite/summarize/reply_suggestion + follow-ups).
- Does not change Copilot sidebar flow instrumentation.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Manual verification steps
<img width="1906" height="832" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f0ade43b-aa8d-41be-8ca2-20a091a81f60"
/>
<img width="828" height="280" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/be76219e-fb61-4a6e-bff5-dc085b0a3cc9"
/>
<img width="415" height="147" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36802c5c-33a7-49ed-bf7e-f0b02d86dccc"
/>
<img width="2040" height="516" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/74b95288-bc86-4312-a282-14211ae8f25c"
/>
1. Open a conversation with Captain tasks enabled.
2. Click AI button in top panel and inline editor.
3. Confirm analytics events fire for:
- AI menu opened
4. Run an AI action and force a failure scenario (or empty response
path) and confirm generation-failed event.
5. Accept AI output, then:
- send without changes -> editedBeforeSend: false
- edit then send -> editedBeforeSend: true
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Summary
Fix hardcoded `Chatwoot` branding in two UI tooltips using the existing
`useBranding` flow so self-hosted/white-label deployments no longer show
the wrong brand text.
## Changes
- LabelSuggestion tooltip now uses:
- `replaceInstallationName($t('LABEL_MGMT.SUGGESTIONS.POWERED_BY'))`
- Message avatar tooltip (native app/external echo) now uses:
- `replaceInstallationName(t('CONVERSATION.NATIVE_APP_ADVISORY'))`
## Why
This follows the existing branding pattern already used in the product
and keeps behavior consistent across deployments.
## Notes
- No change to message logic or API behavior.
- `AGENTS.md` updated with a branding guidance note.
## Fixes
- Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13306
- Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13466
## Testing
<img width="195" height="155" alt="Screenshot 2026-02-13 at 3 55 39 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5b295cdd-6e5d-42c0-bbd7-23ba7052e1c3"
/>
<img width="721" height="152" alt="Screenshot 2026-02-13 at 3 55 48 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/19cec2a0-451f-4fb3-bd61-7c2e591fc3c7"
/>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes the following updates:
1. Updated the design system color tokens by introducing new tokens for
surfaces, overlays, buttons, labels, and cards, along with refinements
to existing shades.
2. Refreshed both light and dark themes with adjusted background,
border, and solid colors.
3. Replaced static Inter font files with the Inter variable font
(including italic), supporting weights from 100–900.
4. Added custom font weights (420, 440, 460, 520) along with custom
typography classes to enable more fine-grained and consistent typography
control.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
We are expanding Chatwoot’s automation capabilities by
introducing **Conversation Workflows**, a dedicated section in settings
where teams can configure rules that govern how conversations are closed
and what information agents must fill before resolving. This feature
helps teams enforce data consistency, collect structured resolution
information, and ensure downstream reporting is accurate.
Instead of having auto‑resolution buried inside Account Settings, we
introduced a new sidebar item:
- Auto‑resolve conversations (existing behaviour)
- Required attributes on resolution (new)
This groups all conversation‑closing logic into a single place.
#### Required Attributes on Resolve
Admins can now pick which custom conversation attributes must be filled
before an agent can resolve a conversation.
**How it works**
- Admin selects one or more attributes from the list of existing
conversation level custom attributes.
- These selected attributes become mandatory during resolution.
- List all the attributes configured via Required Attributes (Text,
Number, Link, Date, List, Checkbox)
- When an agent clicks Resolve Conversation:
If attributes already have values → the conversation resolves normally.
If attributes are missing → a modal appears prompting the agent to fill
them.
<img width="1554" height="1282" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 42
23@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4cd5d6e1-abe8-4999-accd-d4a08913b373"
/>
#### Custom Attributes Integration
On the Custom Attributes page, we will surfaced indicators showing how
each attribute is being used.
Each attribute will show badges such as:
- Resolution → used in the required‑on‑resolve workflow
- Pre‑chat form → already existing
<img width="2390" height="1822" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 43
42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b92a6eb7-7f6c-40e6-bf23-6a5310f2d9c5"
/>
#### Admin Flow
- Navigate to Settings → Conversation Workflows.
- Under Required attributes on resolve, click Add Required Attribute.
- Pick from the dropdown list of conversation attributes.
- Save changes.
Agents will now be prompted automatically whenever they resolve.
<img width="2434" height="872" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 44 42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/632fc0e5-767c-4a1c-8cf4-ffe3d058d319"
/>
#### NOTES
- The Required Attributes on Resolve modal should only appear when
values are missing.
- Required attributes must block the resolution action until satisfied.
- Bulk‑resolve actions should follow the same rules — any conversation
missing attributes cannot be bulk‑resolved, rest will be resolved, show
a notification that the resolution cannot be done.
- API resolution does not respect the attributes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
CSAT scores are helpful, but on their own they rarely tell the full
story. A drop in rating can come from delayed timelines, unclear
expectations, or simple misunderstandings, even when the issue itself
was handled correctly.
Review Notes for CSAT let admins/report manager roles add internal-only
context next to each CSAT response. This makes it easier to interpret
scores properly and focus on patterns and root causes, not just numbers.
<img width="2170" height="1680" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56df7fab-d0a7-4a94-95b9-e4c459ad33d5"
/>
### Why this matters
* Capture the real context behind individual CSAT ratings
* Clarify whether a low score points to a genuine service issue or a
process gap
* Spot recurring themes across conversations and teams
* Make CSAT reviews more useful for leadership reviews and
retrospectives
### How Review Notes work
**View CSAT responses**
Open the CSAT report to see overall metrics, rating distribution, and
individual responses.
**Add a Review Note**
For any CSAT entry, managers can add a Review Note directly below the
customer’s feedback.
**Document internal insights**
Use Review Notes to capture things like:
* Why a score was lower or higher than expected
* Patterns you are seeing across similar cases
* Observations around communication, timelines, or customer expectations
Review Notes are visible only to administrators and people with report
access only. We may expand visibility to agents in the future based on
feedback. However, customers never see them.
Each note clearly shows who added it and when, making it easy to review
context and changes over time.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR reverts the plain text editor back to the **advanced editor**,
which was previously removed in
[https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13058](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13058).
All channels now use the **ProseMirror editor**, with formatting applied
based on each channel’s configuration.
This PR also fixes issues where **new lines were not properly preserved
during Markdown serialization**, for both:
* `Enter or CMD/Ctrl+enter` (new paragraph)
* `Shift+Enter` (`hard_break`)
Additionally, it resolves related **[Sentry
issue](https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/?environment=production&project=4507182691975168&query=is%3Aunresolved%20markdown&referrer=issue-list&statsPeriod=7d)**.
With these changes:
* Line breaks and spacing are now preserved correctly when saving canned
responses.
* When editing a canned response, the content retains the exact spacing
and formatting as saved in editor.
* Canned responses are now correctly converted to plain text where
required and displayed consistently in the canned response list.
### https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/38
---
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
fixes: #11834
This pull request introduces TikTok channel integration, enabling users
to connect and manage TikTok business accounts similarly to other
supported social channels. The changes span backend API endpoints,
authentication helpers, webhook handling, configuration, and frontend
components to support TikTok as a first-class channel.
**Key Notes**
* This integration is only compatible with TikTok Business Accounts
* Special permissions are required to access the TikTok [Business
Messaging
API](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832183871604753).
* The Business Messaging API is region-restricted and is currently
unavailable to users in the EU.
* Only TEXT, IMAGE, and POST_SHARE messages are currently supported due
to limitations in the TikTok Business Messaging API
* A message will be successfully sent only if it contains text alone or
one image attachment. Messages with multiple attachments or those
combining text and attachments will fail and receive a descriptive error
status.
* Messages sent directly from the TikTok App will be synced into the
system
* Initiating a new conversation from the system is not permitted due to
limitations from the TikTok Business Messaging API.
**Backend: TikTok Channel Integration**
* Added `Api::V1::Accounts::Tiktok::AuthorizationsController` to handle
TikTok OAuth authorization initiation, returning the TikTok
authorization URL.
* Implemented `Tiktok::CallbacksController` to handle TikTok OAuth
callback, process authorization results, create or update channel/inbox,
and handle errors or denied scopes.
* Added `Webhooks::TiktokController` to receive and verify TikTok
webhook events, including signature verification and event dispatching.
* Created `Tiktok::IntegrationHelper` module for JWT-based token
generation and verification for secure TikTok OAuth state management.
**Configuration and Feature Flags**
* Added TikTok app credentials (`TIKTOK_APP_ID`, `TIKTOK_APP_SECRET`) to
allowed configs and app config, and registered TikTok as a feature in
the super admin features YAML.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-5e46e1d248631a1147521477d84a54f8ba6846ea21c61eca5f70042d960467f4R43)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-8bf37a019cab1dedea458c437bd93e34af1d6e22b1672b1d43ef6eaa4dcb7732R69)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-123164bea29f3c096b0d018702b090d5ae670760c729141bd4169a36f5f5c1caR74-R79)
**Frontend: TikTok Channel UI and Messaging Support**
* Added `TiktokChannel` API client for frontend TikTok authorization
requests.
* Updated channel icon mappings and tests to include TikTok
(`Channel::Tiktok`).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-b852739ed45def61218d581d0de1ba73f213f55570aa5eec52aaa08f380d0e16R16)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-3cd3ae32e94ef85f1f2c4435abf0775cc0614fb37ee25d97945cd51573ef199eR64-R69)
* Enabled TikTok as a supported channel in contact forms, channel
widgets, and feature toggles.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-ec59c85e1403aaed1a7de35971fe16b7033d5cd763be590903ebf8f1ca25a010R47)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-ec59c85e1403aaed1a7de35971fe16b7033d5cd763be590903ebf8f1ca25a010R69)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R26-R29)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R51-R54)
[[5]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R68)
* Updated message meta logic to support TikTok-specific message statuses
(sent, delivered, read).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696R23)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L63-R65)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L81-R84)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L103-R107)
* Added support for embedded message attachments (e.g., TikTok embeds)
with a new `EmbedBubble` component and updated message rendering logic.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-c3d701caf27d9c31e200c6143c11a11b9d8826f78aa2ce5aa107470e6fdb9d7fR31)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-047859f9368a46d6d20177df7d6d623768488ecc38a5b1e284f958fad49add68R1-R19)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-c3d701caf27d9c31e200c6143c11a11b9d8826f78aa2ce5aa107470e6fdb9d7fR316)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-cbc85e7c4c8d56f2a847d0b01cd48ef36e5f87b43023bff0520fdfc707283085R52)
* Adjusted reply policy and UI messaging for TikTok's 48-hour reply
window.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-0d691f6a983bd89502f91253ecf22e871314545d1e3d3b106fbfc76bf6d8e1c7R208-R210)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-0d691f6a983bd89502f91253ecf22e871314545d1e3d3b106fbfc76bf6d8e1c7R224-R226)
These changes collectively enable end-to-end TikTok channel support,
from configuration and OAuth flow to webhook processing and frontend
message handling.
------------
# TikTok App Setup & Configuration
1. Grant access to the Business Messaging API
([Documentation](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832184145137922))
2. Set the app authorization redirect URL to
`https://FRONTEND_URL/tiktok/callback`
3. Update the installation config with TikTok App ID and Secret
4. Create a Business Messaging Webhook configuration and set the
callback url to `https://FRONTEND_URL/webhooks/tiktok`
([Documentation](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832190670631937))
. You can do this by calling
`Tiktok::AuthClient.update_webhook_callback` from rails console once you
finish Tiktok channel configuration in super admin ( will be automated
in future )
5. Enable TikTok channel feature in an account
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR restores the plain text editor for all channels except Website,
Email, and API.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
1. This PR is an enhancement to
https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/13045
It strips unsupported formatting from **message signatures** based on
each channel’s formatting capabilities defined in the `FORMATTING`
config
2. Remove usage of plain editor in Compose new conversation modal
Only the following signature elements are considered:
<strong>bold (<code inline="">strong</code>), italic (<code
inline="">em</code>), links (<code inline="">link</code>), images (<code
inline="">image</code>)</strong>.</p>
Any formatting not supported by the target channel is automatically
removed before the signature is appended.
<h3>Channel-wise Signature Formatting Support</h3>
Channel | Keeps in Signature | Strips from Signature
-- | -- | --
Email | bold, italic, links, images | —
WebWidget | bold, italic, links, images | —
API | bold, italic | links, images
WhatsApp | bold, italic | links, images
Telegram | bold, italic, links | images
Facebook | bold, italic | links, images
Instagram | bold, italic | links, images
Line | bold, italic | links, images
SMS | — | everything
Twilio SMS | — | everything
Twitter/X | — | everything
<hr>
<h3>📝 Note</h3>
<blockquote>
<p>Message signatures only support <strong>bold, italic, links, and
images</strong>.<br>
Other formatting options available in the editor (lists, code blocks,
strike-through, etc.) do <strong>not apply</strong> to signatures and
are ignored.</p>
</blockquote>
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Loom video
https://www.loom.com/share/d325ab86ca514c6d8f90dfe72a8928dd
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes,
1. **Channel-specific formatting and menu options** for the rich reply
editor.
2. **Removal of the plain reply editor** and full **standardization** on
the rich reply editor across all channels.
3. **Fix for multiple canned responses insertion:**
* **Before:** The plain editor only allowed inserting canned responses
at the beginning of a message, making it impossible to combine multiple
canned responses in a single reply. This caused inconsistent behavior
across the app.
* **Solution:** Replaced the plain reply editor with the rich
(ProseMirror) editor to ensure a unified experience. Agents can now
insert multiple canned responses at any cursor position.
4. **Floating editor menu** for the reply box to improve accessibility
and overall user experience.
5. **New Strikethrough formatting option** added to the editor menu.
---
**Editor repo PR**:
https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/36
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/12517,
[CW-5924](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5924/standardize-the-editor),
[CW-5679](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5679/allow-inserting-multiple-canned-responses-in-a-single-message)
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
**Dark**
<img width="850" height="345" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/47748e6c-380f-44a3-9e3b-c27e0c830bd0"
/>
**Light**
<img width="850" height="345" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6746cf32-bf63-4280-a5bd-bbd42c3cbe84"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Vinay Keerthi <11478411+stonecharioteer@users.noreply.github.com>
