## Description
Fixes a critical bug where conversations assigned to a team could be
auto-assigned to agents outside that team when all team members were at
capacity.
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> **Medium Risk**
> Changes core assignment selection for both legacy and v2 flows;
misconfiguration of `allow_auto_assign` or team membership could cause
conversations to remain unassigned.
>
> **Overview**
> Prevents auto-assignment from crossing team boundaries by filtering
eligible agents to the conversation’s `team` members (and requiring
`team.allow_auto_assign`) in both the legacy `AutoAssignmentHandler`
path and the v2 `AutoAssignment::AssignmentService` (including the
Enterprise override).
>
> Adds test coverage to ensure team-scoped conversations only assign to
team members, and are skipped when team auto-assign is disabled or no
team members are available; also updates the conversations controller
spec setup to include team membership.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
67ed2bda0cd8ffd56c7e0253b86369dead2e6155. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
Adds an account-level setting `keep_pending_on_bot_failure` to control
whether conversations should move from pending to open when agent bot
webhooks fail.
Some users experience occasional message drops and don't want
conversations to automatically reopen due to transient bot failures.
This setting gives accounts control over that behavior. This is a
temporary setting which will be removed in future once a proper fix for
it is done, so it is not added in the UI.
Upgrade rails to 7.2.2 so that we can proceed with the rails 8 upgrade
afterwards
# Changelog
- `.circleci/config.yml` — align CI DB setup with GitHub Actions
(`db:create` + `db:schema:load`) to avoid trigger-dependent prep steps.
- `.rubocop.yml` — add `rubocop-rspec_rails` and disable new cops that
don't match existing spec style.
- `AGENTS.md` — document that specs should run without `.env` (rename
temporarily when present).
- `Gemfile` — upgrade to Rails 7.2, switch Azure storage gem, pin
`commonmarker`, bump `sidekiq-cron`, add `rubocop-rspec_rails`, and
relax some gem pins.
- `Gemfile.lock` — dependency lockfile updates from the Rails 7.2 and
gem changes.
- `app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/integrations/linear_controller.rb` —
stringify params before passing to the Linear service to keep key types
stable.
- `app/controllers/super_admin/instance_statuses_controller.rb` — use
`MigrationContext` API for migration status in Rails 7.2.
- `app/models/installation_config.rb` — add commentary on YAML
serialization and future JSONB migration (no behavior change).
- `app/models/integrations/hook.rb` — ensure hook type is set on create
only and guard against missing app.
- `app/models/user.rb` — update enum syntax for Rails 7.2 deprecation,
serialize OTP backup codes with JSON, and use Ruby `alias`.
- `app/services/crm/leadsquared/setup_service.rb` — stringify hook
settings keys before merge to keep JSON shape consistent.
- `app/services/macros/execution_service.rb` — remove macro-specific
assignee activity workaround; rely on standard assignment handlers.
- `config/application.rb` — load Rails 7.2 defaults.
- `config/storage.yml` — update Azure Active Storage service name to
`AzureBlob`.
- `db/migrate/20230515051424_update_article_image_keys.rb` — use
credentials `secret_key_base` with fallback to legacy secrets.
- `docker/Dockerfile` — add `yaml-dev` and `pkgconf` packages for native
extensions (Ruby 3.4 / psych).
- `lib/seeders/reports/message_creator.rb` — add parentheses for clarity
in range calculation.
- `package.json` — pin Vite version and bump `vite-plugin-ruby`.
- `pnpm-lock.yaml` — lockfile changes from JS dependency updates.
- `spec/builders/v2/report_builder_spec.rb` — disable transactional
fixtures; truncate tables per example via Rails `truncate_tables` so
after_commit callbacks run with clean isolation; keep builder spec
metadata minimal.
- `spec/builders/v2/reports/label_summary_builder_spec.rb` — disable
transactional fixtures + truncate tables via Rails `truncate_tables`;
revert to real `resolved!`/`open!`/`resolved!` flow for multiple
resolution events; align date range to `Time.zone` to avoid offset gaps;
keep builder spec metadata minimal.
- `spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/macros_controller_spec.rb` — assert
`assignee_id` instead of activity message to avoid transaction-timing
flakes.
- `spec/services/telegram/incoming_message_service_spec.rb` — reference
the contact tied to the created conversation instead of
`Contact.all.first` to avoid order-dependent failures when other specs
leave data behind.
-
`spec/mailers/administrator_notifications/shared/smtp_config_shared.rb`
— use `with_modified_env` instead of stubbing mailer internals.
- `spec/services/account/sign_up_email_validation_service_spec.rb` —
compare error `class.name` for parallel/reload-safe assertions.
When businesses use WhatsApp Business App (co-existence mode) or
Instagram App or TikTok alongside Chatwoot, messages sent from the
native apps were not synced properly back to Chatwoot. This left agents
with an incomplete conversation history and no visibility into responses
sent outside the dashboard. Additionally, if these echo messages did
arrive, they appeared as "Sent by: Bot" in the UI since they had no
sender, making it confusing for agents.
This PR subscribes to WhatsApp `smb_message_echoes` webhook events and
routes them through the existing service with an `outgoing_echo` flag,
mirroring how Instagram already handles echoes. On the Instagram side,
echo messages now also carry the `external_echo` content attribute and
`delivered` status.
On the frontend, messages with `externalEcho` are distinguished from bot
messages showing a "Native app" avatar and an advisory note encouraging
agents to reply from Chatwoot to maintain the service window.
<img width="1518" height="524" alt="CleanShot 2026-01-29 at 13 37 57@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5aa0b552-6382-441f-96aa-9a62ca716e4a"
/>
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4204/display-messages-not-sent-from-chatwoot-in-case-of-outgoing-echo
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-33/incoming-from-me-messages-from-whatsapp-business-app-are-not-falling
### What
Forces `account_id` to be applied consistently in queries and message creation paths.
### Why
Some queries were missing `account_id`, leading to cross-account scans and slow performance in large datasets.
### Changes
* Added `account_id` to the relevant query columns.
* Ensured messages are always created within the correct account scope.
* Updated `created_at` handling where required for consistency.
### Impact
* Prevents cross-account queries.
* Improves query performance.
* Reduces risk of incorrect data access across accounts.
### Notes
No functional behavior change for end users. This is a performance and safety fix.
We are expanding Chatwoot’s automation capabilities by
introducing **Conversation Workflows**, a dedicated section in settings
where teams can configure rules that govern how conversations are closed
and what information agents must fill before resolving. This feature
helps teams enforce data consistency, collect structured resolution
information, and ensure downstream reporting is accurate.
Instead of having auto‑resolution buried inside Account Settings, we
introduced a new sidebar item:
- Auto‑resolve conversations (existing behaviour)
- Required attributes on resolution (new)
This groups all conversation‑closing logic into a single place.
#### Required Attributes on Resolve
Admins can now pick which custom conversation attributes must be filled
before an agent can resolve a conversation.
**How it works**
- Admin selects one or more attributes from the list of existing
conversation level custom attributes.
- These selected attributes become mandatory during resolution.
- List all the attributes configured via Required Attributes (Text,
Number, Link, Date, List, Checkbox)
- When an agent clicks Resolve Conversation:
If attributes already have values → the conversation resolves normally.
If attributes are missing → a modal appears prompting the agent to fill
them.
<img width="1554" height="1282" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 42
23@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4cd5d6e1-abe8-4999-accd-d4a08913b373"
/>
#### Custom Attributes Integration
On the Custom Attributes page, we will surfaced indicators showing how
each attribute is being used.
Each attribute will show badges such as:
- Resolution → used in the required‑on‑resolve workflow
- Pre‑chat form → already existing
<img width="2390" height="1822" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 43
42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b92a6eb7-7f6c-40e6-bf23-6a5310f2d9c5"
/>
#### Admin Flow
- Navigate to Settings → Conversation Workflows.
- Under Required attributes on resolve, click Add Required Attribute.
- Pick from the dropdown list of conversation attributes.
- Save changes.
Agents will now be prompted automatically whenever they resolve.
<img width="2434" height="872" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 44 42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/632fc0e5-767c-4a1c-8cf4-ffe3d058d319"
/>
#### NOTES
- The Required Attributes on Resolve modal should only appear when
values are missing.
- Required attributes must block the resolution action until satisfied.
- Bulk‑resolve actions should follow the same rules — any conversation
missing attributes cannot be bulk‑resolved, rest will be resolved, show
a notification that the resolution cannot be done.
- API resolution does not respect the attributes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
High-traffic accounts generate excessive database writes due to agents
frequently switching between conversations. The update_last_seen
endpoint was being called every time an agent loaded a conversation,
resulting in unnecessary updates to agent_last_seen_at and
assignee_last_seen_at even when there were no new messages to mark as
read.
#### Solution
Implemented throttling for the update_last_seen endpoint:
**Unread messages present:**
- Updates immediately without throttling to maintain accurate
read/unread state
- Uses assignee_unread_messages for assignees, unread_messages for other
agents
**No unread messages:**
- Throttles updates to once per hour per conversation
- Checks if agent_last_seen_at is older than 1 hour before updating
- For assignees, checks both agent_last_seen_at AND
assignee_last_seen_at - updates if either timestamp is old
- Skips DB write if all relevant timestamps were updated within the last
hour
- Consolidated two separate update_column calls into a single
update_columns call to reduce DB queries
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/13097
### Problem
The PR #12176 removed the `before_save :setup_webhooks` callback to fix
a race condition where Meta's webhook verification request arrived
before the channel was saved to the database. This change broke manual
WhatsApp Cloud channel setup. While embedded signup explicitly calls
`channel.setup_webhooks` in `EmbeddedSignupService`, manual setup had no
equivalent call - meaning the `subscribed_apps` endpoint was never
invoked and Meta never sent webhook events to Chatwoot.
### Solution
Added an `after_commit` callback that triggers webhook setup for manual
WhatsApp Cloud channels
## Linear Ticket
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4569/nomethoderror-undefined-method-blocked-for-nil-nomethoderror
## Description
Fixes NoMethodError in ConversationMuteHelpers that occurs during
contact deletion race condition.
When a contact is deleted, there's a brief window (~50-150ms) where
contact_id becomes nil but conversations still exist. If ResolutionJob
runs during this window, the muted? method crashes trying to call
blocked? on nil.Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Created orphaned conversations (contact_id = nil)
- Called muted?, mute!, unmute! - all return gracefully
- Verified async deletion still works correctly
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
CSAT scores are helpful, but on their own they rarely tell the full
story. A drop in rating can come from delayed timelines, unclear
expectations, or simple misunderstandings, even when the issue itself
was handled correctly.
Review Notes for CSAT let admins/report manager roles add internal-only
context next to each CSAT response. This makes it easier to interpret
scores properly and focus on patterns and root causes, not just numbers.
<img width="2170" height="1680" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56df7fab-d0a7-4a94-95b9-e4c459ad33d5"
/>
### Why this matters
* Capture the real context behind individual CSAT ratings
* Clarify whether a low score points to a genuine service issue or a
process gap
* Spot recurring themes across conversations and teams
* Make CSAT reviews more useful for leadership reviews and
retrospectives
### How Review Notes work
**View CSAT responses**
Open the CSAT report to see overall metrics, rating distribution, and
individual responses.
**Add a Review Note**
For any CSAT entry, managers can add a Review Note directly below the
customer’s feedback.
**Document internal insights**
Use Review Notes to capture things like:
* Why a score was lower or higher than expected
* Patterns you are seeing across similar cases
* Observations around communication, timelines, or customer expectations
Review Notes are visible only to administrators and people with report
access only. We may expand visibility to agents in the future based on
feedback. However, customers never see them.
Each note clearly shows who added it and when, making it easy to review
context and changes over time.
https://one.newrelic.com/alerts/issue?account=3437125&duration=259200000&state=d088e9b7-d0ce-3fcf-fda5-145df8b9cb2a
## Description
Pass serialized data instead of ActiveRecord object in
dispatch_destroy_event to prevent ActiveJob::DeserializationError when
the notification is already deleted.
This error occurs frequently because RemoveDuplicateNotificationJob
deletes notifications, and by the time the async EventDispatcherJob
runs, the record no longer exists.
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Avoids ActiveJob deserialization failures by sending serialized data
for notification deletion and updating the listener accordingly.
>
> - `Notification#dispatch_destroy_event` now dispatches
`NOTIFICATION_DELETED` with serialized `notification_data` (`id`,
`user_id`, `account_id`) instead of the AR object
> - `ActionCableListener#notification_deleted` reads
`notification_data`, finds `User`/`Account`, computes
`unread_count`/`count` via `NotificationFinder`, and broadcasts using
the user’s pubsub token
> - Specs updated to pass `notification_data` and assert payload
(including `unread_count`/`count`)
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
e2ffbe765b148fdfd2cd2e031c657c36e423c1f5. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
The Active Storage blob ids were handled inconsistently across the API.
- When a new logo was uploaded, the upload controller returned a
signed_id
- When loading an existing portal that already had a logo, the portal
model returned a blob_id.
This caused the API portal API to fail. There are about 107 instances of
this in production, so this change will fix that.
When AgentBot responds to customer messages, the `waiting_since`
timestamp is not reset, causing inflated reply time metrics when a human
agent eventually responds. This results in inaccurate reporting that
incorrectly includes periods when customers were satisfied with bot
responses.
### Timeline from Production Data
```
Dec 12, 16:20:14 - Customer sends message (ID: 368451924)
↓ waiting_since = Dec 12, 16:20:14
Dec 12, 16:20:17 - AgentBot replies (ID: 368451960)
↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 ❌
↓ (Bot response doesn't clear it)
14-day gap - Customer satisfied, no messages
↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 ❌
Dec 26, 22:25:45 - Customer sends new message (ID: 383522275)
↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 ❌
↓ (New message doesn't reset it)
Dec 26-27 - More AgentBot interactions
↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 ❌
Dec 27, 07:36:53 - Human agent finally replies (ID: 383799517)
↓ Reply time calculated: 1,268,404 seconds
↓ = 14.7 DAYS ❌
```
## Root Cause
The core issues is in `app/models/message.rb`, where **AgentBot messages
does not clear `waiting_since`** - The `human_response?` method only
returns true for `User` senders, so bot replies never trigger the
clearing logic. This means once `waiting_since` is set, it stays set
even when customers send new messages after receiving bot responses.
The solution is to simply reset `waiting_since` **after a bot has
responded**. This ensures reply time metrics reflect actual human agent
response times, not bot-handled periods.
### What triggers the rest
This is an intentional "gotcha", that only `AgentBot` and
`Captain::Assistant` messages trigger the waiting time reset. Automation
and campaign messages maintain current behavior (no reset). This is
because interactive bot assistants provide conversational help that
might satisfy customers. Automation and campaigns are one-way
communications and shouldn't affect waiting time calculations.
## Related Work
Extends PR #11787 which fixed `waiting_since` clearing on conversation
resolution. This PR addresses the bot interaction scenario which was not
covered by that fix.
Scripts to clean data:
https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/bd133208e219d0ab52fbfdf03036c48a
## Description
Change the url type from string to text, to support more than 255
characters
Fixes # (issue)
https://app.chatwoot.com/app/accounts/1/conversations/65240
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
fixes: #11834
This pull request introduces TikTok channel integration, enabling users
to connect and manage TikTok business accounts similarly to other
supported social channels. The changes span backend API endpoints,
authentication helpers, webhook handling, configuration, and frontend
components to support TikTok as a first-class channel.
**Key Notes**
* This integration is only compatible with TikTok Business Accounts
* Special permissions are required to access the TikTok [Business
Messaging
API](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832183871604753).
* The Business Messaging API is region-restricted and is currently
unavailable to users in the EU.
* Only TEXT, IMAGE, and POST_SHARE messages are currently supported due
to limitations in the TikTok Business Messaging API
* A message will be successfully sent only if it contains text alone or
one image attachment. Messages with multiple attachments or those
combining text and attachments will fail and receive a descriptive error
status.
* Messages sent directly from the TikTok App will be synced into the
system
* Initiating a new conversation from the system is not permitted due to
limitations from the TikTok Business Messaging API.
**Backend: TikTok Channel Integration**
* Added `Api::V1::Accounts::Tiktok::AuthorizationsController` to handle
TikTok OAuth authorization initiation, returning the TikTok
authorization URL.
* Implemented `Tiktok::CallbacksController` to handle TikTok OAuth
callback, process authorization results, create or update channel/inbox,
and handle errors or denied scopes.
* Added `Webhooks::TiktokController` to receive and verify TikTok
webhook events, including signature verification and event dispatching.
* Created `Tiktok::IntegrationHelper` module for JWT-based token
generation and verification for secure TikTok OAuth state management.
**Configuration and Feature Flags**
* Added TikTok app credentials (`TIKTOK_APP_ID`, `TIKTOK_APP_SECRET`) to
allowed configs and app config, and registered TikTok as a feature in
the super admin features YAML.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-5e46e1d248631a1147521477d84a54f8ba6846ea21c61eca5f70042d960467f4R43)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-8bf37a019cab1dedea458c437bd93e34af1d6e22b1672b1d43ef6eaa4dcb7732R69)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-123164bea29f3c096b0d018702b090d5ae670760c729141bd4169a36f5f5c1caR74-R79)
**Frontend: TikTok Channel UI and Messaging Support**
* Added `TiktokChannel` API client for frontend TikTok authorization
requests.
* Updated channel icon mappings and tests to include TikTok
(`Channel::Tiktok`).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-b852739ed45def61218d581d0de1ba73f213f55570aa5eec52aaa08f380d0e16R16)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-3cd3ae32e94ef85f1f2c4435abf0775cc0614fb37ee25d97945cd51573ef199eR64-R69)
* Enabled TikTok as a supported channel in contact forms, channel
widgets, and feature toggles.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-ec59c85e1403aaed1a7de35971fe16b7033d5cd763be590903ebf8f1ca25a010R47)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-ec59c85e1403aaed1a7de35971fe16b7033d5cd763be590903ebf8f1ca25a010R69)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R26-R29)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R51-R54)
[[5]](diffhunk://#diff-725b90ca7e3a6837ec8291e9f57094f6a46b3ee00e598d16564f77f32cf354b0R68)
* Updated message meta logic to support TikTok-specific message statuses
(sent, delivered, read).
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696R23)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L63-R65)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L81-R84)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-e41239cf8dda36c1bd1066dbb17588ae8868e56289072c74b3a6d7ef5abdd696L103-R107)
* Added support for embedded message attachments (e.g., TikTok embeds)
with a new `EmbedBubble` component and updated message rendering logic.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-c3d701caf27d9c31e200c6143c11a11b9d8826f78aa2ce5aa107470e6fdb9d7fR31)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-047859f9368a46d6d20177df7d6d623768488ecc38a5b1e284f958fad49add68R1-R19)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-c3d701caf27d9c31e200c6143c11a11b9d8826f78aa2ce5aa107470e6fdb9d7fR316)
[[4]](diffhunk://#diff-cbc85e7c4c8d56f2a847d0b01cd48ef36e5f87b43023bff0520fdfc707283085R52)
* Adjusted reply policy and UI messaging for TikTok's 48-hour reply
window.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-0d691f6a983bd89502f91253ecf22e871314545d1e3d3b106fbfc76bf6d8e1c7R208-R210)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-0d691f6a983bd89502f91253ecf22e871314545d1e3d3b106fbfc76bf6d8e1c7R224-R226)
These changes collectively enable end-to-end TikTok channel support,
from configuration and OAuth flow to webhook processing and frontend
message handling.
------------
# TikTok App Setup & Configuration
1. Grant access to the Business Messaging API
([Documentation](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832184145137922))
2. Set the app authorization redirect URL to
`https://FRONTEND_URL/tiktok/callback`
3. Update the installation config with TikTok App ID and Secret
4. Create a Business Messaging Webhook configuration and set the
callback url to `https://FRONTEND_URL/webhooks/tiktok`
([Documentation](https://business-api.tiktok.com/portal/docs?id=1832190670631937))
. You can do this by calling
`Tiktok::AuthClient.update_webhook_callback` from rails console once you
finish Tiktok channel configuration in super admin ( will be automated
in future )
5. Enable TikTok channel feature in an account
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes,
1. **Channel-specific formatting and menu options** for the rich reply
editor.
2. **Removal of the plain reply editor** and full **standardization** on
the rich reply editor across all channels.
3. **Fix for multiple canned responses insertion:**
* **Before:** The plain editor only allowed inserting canned responses
at the beginning of a message, making it impossible to combine multiple
canned responses in a single reply. This caused inconsistent behavior
across the app.
* **Solution:** Replaced the plain reply editor with the rich
(ProseMirror) editor to ensure a unified experience. Agents can now
insert multiple canned responses at any cursor position.
4. **Floating editor menu** for the reply box to improve accessibility
and overall user experience.
5. **New Strikethrough formatting option** added to the editor menu.
---
**Editor repo PR**:
https://github.com/chatwoot/prosemirror-schema/pull/36
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/12517,
[CW-5924](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5924/standardize-the-editor),
[CW-5679](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5679/allow-inserting-multiple-canned-responses-in-a-single-message)
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
**Dark**
<img width="850" height="345" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/47748e6c-380f-44a3-9e3b-c27e0c830bd0"
/>
**Light**
<img width="850" height="345" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6746cf32-bf63-4280-a5bd-bbd42c3cbe84"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Vinay Keerthi <11478411+stonecharioteer@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
- Fixes SSL certificate verification errors when testing LINE webhooks
in development environments
- Configures the LINE Bot API client to skip SSL verification only in
development mode
## Background
When testing LINE webhooks locally on macOS, the LINE Bot SDK was
failing with:
```
OpenSSL::SSL::SSLError: SSL_connect returned=1 errno=0 state=error: certificate verify failed (unable to get certificate CRL)
```
This occurs because the LINE Bot SDK tries to fetch user profiles via
HTTPS, and OpenSSL on macOS development environments may not have proper
access to Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs).
## Changes
- Added `http_options` configuration to the LINE Bot client in
`Channel::Line#client`
- Sets `verify_mode: OpenSSL::SSL::VERIFY_NONE` only when
`Rails.env.development?` is true
- Production environments continue to use full SSL verification for
security
## Test Plan
- [x] Send a LINE message to trigger webhook in development
- [x] Verify webhook is processed without SSL errors
- [x] Confirm change only applies in development mode
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Description
When a user tries creating a new account through the Super Admin
dashboard, and they forget to fill in the account name, they're faced
with an ugly error (generic "Something went wrong" on production).
This PR simply adds the `validates :name, presence: true` model
validation on `Account` model, which is translated as a proper error
message on the Super Admin UI.
## Summary
- add an assignee_agent_bot_id column as an initital step to prototype
this before fully switching to polymorphic assignee
- update assignment APIs and conversation list / show endpoints to
reflect assignee as agent bot
- ensure webhook payloads contains agent bot assignee
[Codex
Task](https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6912833377e48326b6641b9eee32d50f)
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
## Summary
- add a configurable MAXIMUM_FILE_UPLOAD_SIZE installation setting and
surface it through super admin and global config payloads
- apply the configurable limit to attachment validations and shared
upload helpers on dashboard and widget
- introduce a reusable helper with unit tests for parsing the limit and
extend attachment specs for configurability
------
[Codex
Task](https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6912644786b08326bc8dee9401af6d0a)
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
## Description
Fixes CW-5961 where IMAP email processing failed with
`ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed: Source is too long
(maximum is 255 characters)` error.
This changes the `contact_inboxes.source_id` column from `string` (255
character limit) to `text` (unlimited) to accommodate long email message
IDs that were causing validation failures.
Fixes CW-5961
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added spec test validating `source_id` values longer than 255
characters (300 chars)
- All existing `contact_inbox_spec.rb` tests pass (7 examples, 0
failures)
- Migration applied successfully with reversible up/down methods
- Verified `source_id` column type changed to `text` with `null: false`
constraint preserved
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
## Linear Link
## Description
This PR introduces a new robust auto-assignment system for conversations
in Chatwoot. The system replaces the existing round-robin assignment
with a more sophisticated service-based architecture that supports
multiple assignment strategies, rate limiting, and Enterprise features
like capacity-based assignment and balanced distribution.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Unit test cases
- Test conversations getting assigned on status change to open
- Test the job directly via rails console
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Adds a new service-based auto-assignment system with scheduled jobs,
rate limiting, enterprise capacity/balanced selection, and wiring via
inbox/handler; includes Redis helpers and comprehensive tests.
>
> - **Auto-assignment v2 (core services)**:
> - Add `AutoAssignment::AssignmentService` with bulk assignment,
configurable conversation priority, RR selection, and per-agent rate
limiting via `AutoAssignment::RateLimiter`.
> - Add `AutoAssignment::RoundRobinSelector` for agent selection.
> - **Jobs & scheduling**:
> - Add `AutoAssignment::AssignmentJob` (per-inbox bulk assign;
env-based limit) and `AutoAssignment::PeriodicAssignmentJob` (batch over
accounts/inboxes).
> - Schedule periodic run in `config/schedule.yml`
(`periodic_assignment_job`).
> - **Model/concerns wiring**:
> - Include `InboxAgentAvailability` in `Inbox`; add
`Inbox#auto_assignment_v2_enabled?`.
> - Update `AutoAssignmentHandler` to trigger v2 job when
`auto_assignment_v2_enabled?`, else fallback to legacy.
> - **Enterprise extensions**:
> - Add `Enterprise::InboxAgentAvailability` (capacity-aware filtering)
and `Enterprise::Concerns::Inbox` association `inbox_capacity_limits`.
> - Extend service via `Enterprise::AutoAssignment::AssignmentService`
(policy-driven config, capacity filtering, exclusion rules) and add
selectors/services: `BalancedSelector`, `CapacityService`.
> - **Infrastructure**:
> - Enhance `Redis::Alfred` with `expire`, key scan/count, and extended
ZSET helpers (`zadd`, `zcount`, `zcard`, `zrangebyscore`).
> - **Tests**:
> - Add specs for jobs, core service, rate limiter, RR selector, and
enterprise features (capacity, balanced selection, exclusions).
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
0ebe187c8aea73765b0122a44b18d6f465c2477f. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
## Description
When working with webhooks, it's easy to lose track of which URL is
which. Adding a `name` (optional) column to the webhook model is a
straight-forward solution to make it significantly easier to identify
webhooks.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Model and controller specs, and also running in production over several
months without any issues.
| Before | After |
| --- | --- |
| <img width="949" height="990" alt="image copy 3"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6b33c072-7d16-4a9c-a129-f9c0751299f5"
/> | <img width="806" height="941" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/77f3cb3a-2eb0-41ac-95bf-d02915589690"
/> |
| <img width="1231" height="650" alt="image copy 2"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/583374af-96e0-4436-b026-4ce79b7f9321"
/> | <img width="1252" height="650" alt="image copy"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa81fb31-fd18-4e21-a40e-d8ab0dc76b4e"
/> |
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
Refactored the `Message#search_data` method to prevent exceeding
OpenSearch's 1000 field limit during reindex operations.
**Problem:** The previous implementation serialized entire ActiveRecord
objects (Inbox, Sender, Conversation) with all their JSONB fields,
causing dynamic field explosion in OpenSearch. This resulted in
`Searchkick::ImportError` with "Limit of total fields [1000] has been
exceeded".
**Solution:** Whitelisted only necessary fields for search and
filtering, and flattened JSONB `custom_attributes` into key-value pair
arrays to prevent unbounded field creation.
Linked to: CW-5861
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [x] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Verified rubocop passes with no offenses
- Code review of search field usage from
`enterprise/app/services/enterprise/search_service.rb`
- Analyzed actual search queries to determine required indexed fields
**Still needed:**
- Full reindex test on staging/production environment
- Verify search functionality still works after reindex
- Confirm field count is under 1000 limit
## Changes Made
### Before
- Indexed 1000+ fields (entire AR objects with JSONB)
- `inbox` = full Inbox object (23+ fields + JSONB)
- `sender` = full Contact/User/AgentBot object (10+ fields + JSONB)
- `conversation` = full push_event_data
- Dynamic JSONB keys creating unlimited fields
### After
- ~35-40 controlled fields
- Whitelisted search fields: `content`, `attachment_transcribed_text`,
`email_subject`
- Filter fields: `account_id`, `inbox_id`, `conversation_id`,
`sender_id`, `sender_type`, etc.
- Flattened `custom_attributes`: `[{key, value, value_type}]` format
- Helper methods: `search_conversation_data`, `search_inbox_data`,
`search_sender_data`, `search_additional_data`
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Post-merge Steps
After merging, the following steps are required:
1. **Reindex all messages:**
```bash
bundle exec rails runner "Message.reindex"
```
2. **Verify field count:**
```bash
bundle exec rails runner "
client = Searchkick.client
index_name = Message.searchkick_index.name
mapping = client.indices.get_mapping(index: index_name)
fields = mapping.dig(index_name, 'mappings', 'properties')
puts 'Total fields: ' + fields.keys.count.to_s
"
```
3. **Test search functionality** to ensure queries still work as
expected
---------
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Previously, email replies were handled inside workers. There was no
execution logs. This meant if emails silently failed (as reported by a
customer), we had no way to trace where the issue happened, the only
assumption was “no error = mail sent.”
By moving email handling into jobs, we now have proper execution logs
for each attempt. This makes it easier to debug delivery issues and
would have better visibility when investigating customer reports.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5538/emails-are-not-sentdelivered-to-the-contact
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
## Changelog
- Added conditional Active Record encryption to every external
credential we store (SMTP/IMAP passwords, Twilio tokens,
Slack/OpenAI hook tokens, Facebook/Instagram tokens, LINE/Telegram keys,
Twitter secrets) so new writes are encrypted
whenever Chatwoot.encryption_configured? is true; legacy installs still
receive plaintext until their secrets are
updated.
- Tuned encryption settings in config/application.rb to allow legacy
reads (support_unencrypted_data) and to extend
deterministic queries so lookups continue to match plaintext rows during
the rollout; added TODOs to retire the
fallback once encryption becomes mandatory.
- Introduced an MFA-pipeline test suite
(spec/models/external_credentials_encryption_spec.rb) plus shared
examples to
verify each attribute encrypts at rest and that plaintext records
re-encrypt on update, with a dedicated Telegram case.
The existing MFA GitHub workflow now runs these tests using the
preconfigured encryption keys.
fixes:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5453/encrypt-sensitive-credentials-stored-in-plain-text-in-database
## Testing Instructions
1. Instance without encryption keys
- Unset ACTIVE_RECORD_ENCRYPTION_* vars (or run in an environment where
they’re absent).
- Create at least one credentialed channel (e.g., Email SMTP).
- Confirm workflows still function (send/receive mail or a similar
sanity check).
- In the DB you should still see plaintext values—this confirms the
guard prevents encryption when keys are missing.
2. Instance with encryption keys
- Configure the three encryption env vars and restart.
- Pick a couple of representative integrations (e.g., Email SMTP +
Twilio SMS).
- Legacy channel check:
- Use existing records created before enabling keys. Trigger their
workflow (send an email / SMS, or hit the
webhook) to ensure they still authenticate.
- Inspect the raw column—value remains plaintext until changed.
- Update legacy channel:
- Edit one legacy channel’s credential (e.g., change SMTP password).
- Verify the operation still works and the stored value is now encrypted
(raw column differs, accessor returns
original).
- New channel creation:
- Create a new channel of the same type; confirm functionality and that
the stored credential is encrypted from
the start.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Changes searchkick callback behavior to check `should_index?` before
creating reindex jobs, preventing unnecessary job creation for messages
that don't need indexing (activity messages, unpaid accounts, etc.).
Previously, `callbacks: :async` created reindex jobs for all messages
(~5,100/min or 7.3M/day in production), which were then filtered by
`should_index?` inside the job worker - resulting in 98% wasted jobs,
Redis memory pressure, and avoidable p0 alerts.
Now, `should_index?` is checked before job creation via `after_commit`
callback, reducing job creation to actual incoming/outgoing messages
from paid accounts.
Changes:
- Disable automatic searchkick callbacks
- Add manual `after_commit` callback with `should_index?` condition
- Add specs to verify callback behavior
Expected impact:
- 98% reduction in sidekiq job creation (~7.3M → ~150K jobs/day)
- Reduced redis memory usage
- Same async indexing behavior for eligible messages
# Pull Request Template
## Description
* add Company model with validations for name, domain, description and
avatar
* Add database migration fo
* Implement endpoints for company CRUD operations
* Add optional company relationship for contacts
* Add test for models, controllers, factories and policies
* Add authorization policies restricting delete to admins
* support JSON API responses
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes #(cw-5650)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tests are implemented using `RSpec`
```
$ bundle exec rails db:migrate
$ bundle exec rspec spec/models/company_spec.rb spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb
```
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR fixes the following error:
`I18n::MissingInterpolationArgument: missing interpolation argument
:assignee_name in "Asignado a %{assignee_name} por %{user_name}"
({user_name: "Marketing Telpronet"} given)
(I18n::MissingInterpolationArgument)`
**Issue**
In the Spanish locale, an `I18n::MissingInterpolationArgument` error
occurred during bulk assignee operations.
This happened because `assignee&.name` was returning `nil`, and the
`.compact` method removed the `assignee_name` key entirely from the
params.
<img width="1744" height="164" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3c15ed77-48c0-4938-a7fd-356bdb07da39"
/>
**Solution**
* Always include the `assignee_name` key with an empty string (`''`)
when its value is `nil`.
* Removed the `.compact` method call to ensure the interpolation key is
always present.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5747/i18nmissinginterpolationargument-missing-interpolation-argument
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR increases the custom filter limit from 50 to 1000 per user
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
<img width="1264" height="71" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e12667bb-147c-4115-b8a8-9113fca471db"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
With this change, the indexing would be separate from the search, so you
need to enable indexing on the cloud and run it. It should start
indexing the messages to ElasticSearch/OpenSearch. Once indexing is
completed, we can turn on the feature for the customer.
Make sure that the following is done when you deploy.
Set POSTGRES_STATEMENT_TIMEOUT=600s before you run the indexing.
1. Make sure that the account with advanced_search has
advanced_search_indexing enabled
```rb
Account.feature_advanced_search.each do |account|
account.enable_features(:advanced_search_indexing)
account.save!
end
```
2. Enable indexing for all accounts with paid subscription.
```rb
Account.where("custom_attributes ->> 'plan_name' IN (?)", ['Enterprise', 'Startups', 'Business']).each do |account|
account.enable_features(:advanced_search_indexing)
account.save!
end
```
3. Run indexing for all the messages.
```rb
Message.reindex
```
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
## Linear:
- https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/486
## Description
This PR implements Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) support for user
accounts, enhancing security by requiring a second form of verification
during login. The feature adds TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password)
authentication with QR code generation and backup codes for account
recovery.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added comprehensive RSpec tests for MFA controller functionality
- Tested MFA setup flow with QR code generation
- Verified OTP validation and backup code generation
- Tested login flow with MFA enabled/disabled
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
