# Changelog
When an agent bot webhook fails, we now flip any pending conversation
back to an open state so a human agent can pick
it up immediately. There will be an clear activity message giving the
team clear visibility into what went
wrong. This keeps customers from getting stuck in limbo when their
connected bot goes offline.
# Testing instructions
1. Initial setup: Create an agent bot with a working webhook URL and
connect it to a test inbox. Send a message from a
contact (e.g., via the widget) so a conversation is created; it should
enter the Pending state while the bot handles
the reply.
2. Introduce failure: Edit that agent bot and swap the webhook URL for a
dummy endpoint that will fail. Have the same
contact send another message in the existing conversation. Because the
webhook call now fails, the conversation should flip from Pending back
to Open, making it visible to agents. Also verify the activity message
3. New conversation check: With the dummy URL still in place, start a
brand-new conversation from a contact. When the
bot tries (and fails) to respond, confirm that the conversation appears
immediately as Open rather than remaining Pending. Also the activity
message is visible
4. Subsequent messages in open conversations will show no change
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
* add Company model with validations for name, domain, description and
avatar
* Add database migration fo
* Implement endpoints for company CRUD operations
* Add optional company relationship for contacts
* Add test for models, controllers, factories and policies
* Add authorization policies restricting delete to admins
* support JSON API responses
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes #(cw-5650)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tests are implemented using `RSpec`
```
$ bundle exec rails db:migrate
$ bundle exec rspec spec/models/company_spec.rb spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb
```
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR increases the custom filter limit from 50 to 1000 per user
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshot
<img width="1264" height="71" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e12667bb-147c-4115-b8a8-9113fca471db"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Linear:
- https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/486
## Description
This PR implements Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) support for user
accounts, enhancing security by requiring a second form of verification
during login. The feature adds TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password)
authentication with QR code generation and backup codes for account
recovery.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added comprehensive RSpec tests for MFA controller functionality
- Tested MFA setup flow with QR code generation
- Verified OTP validation and backup code generation
- Tested login flow with MFA enabled/disabled
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This PR adds the foundation for account-level SAML SSO configuration in
Chatwoot Enterprise. It introduces a new `AccountSamlSettings` model and
management API that allows accounts to configure their own SAML identity
providers independently, this also includes the certificate generation
flow
The implementation includes a new controller
(`Api::V1::Accounts::SamlSettingsController`) that provides CRUD
operations for SAML configuration
The feature is properly gated behind the 'saml' feature flag and
includes administrator-only authorization via Pundit policies.
## Linear reference:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4649/re-imagine-assignments
## Description
This PR introduces the foundation for Assignment V2 system by
implementing agent_capacity and their association with inboxes and
users.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Test Coverage:
- Controller specs for assignment policies CRUD operations
- Enterprise-specific specs for balanced assignment order
- Model specs for community/enterprise separation
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
## Linear reference:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4649/re-imagine-assignments
## Description
This PR introduces the foundation for Assignment V2 system by
implementing assignment policies and their association with inboxes.
Assignment policies allow configuring how conversations are distributed
among agents, with support for different assignment orders (round_robin
in community, balanced in enterprise) and conversation prioritization
strategies
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Test Coverage:
- Controller specs for assignment policies CRUD operations
- Enterprise-specific specs for balanced assignment order
- Model specs for community/enterprise separation
Manual Testing:
1. Create assignment policy: POST
/api/v1/accounts/{id}/assignment_policies
2. List policies: GET /api/v1/accounts/{id}/assignment_policies
3. Assign policy to inbox: POST
/api/v1/accounts/{id}/assignment_policies/{id}/inboxes
4. View inbox policy: GET
/api/v1/accounts/{id}/inboxes/{id}/assignment_policy
5. Verify community edition ignores "balanced" assignment order
6. Verify enterprise edition supports both "round_robin" and "balanced"
- testing the flows after enterprise folder deletion
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Fixes
[CW-4620](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-4620/rethinking-custom-domains-in-chatwoot)
<img width="642" height="187" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-29 at 8 17 44 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ad2f5dac-4b27-4dce-93ca-6cbba74443fb"
/>
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranavrajs@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
…on (#11584)"
This reverts commit b5ebc47637.
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Please include a summary of the change and issue(s) fixed. Also, mention
relevant motivation, context, and any dependencies that this change
requires.
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Fixes https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/11569
## Problem
On platforms like WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger, customers cannot
reply to messages after 24 hours (or other channel-specific messaging
windows). Despite this limitation, the system continued sending CSAT
surveys to customers outside their messaging window, making it
impossible for them to respond.
## Solution
Added a check for `conversation.can_reply?` in the
`should_send_csat_survey?` method. This leverages the existing
`MessageWindowService` which already handles all channel-specific
messaging window logic.
Show captain messages under the name of the assistant which generated
the message.
- Add support for `Captain::Assistant` sender type
- Add push_event_data for captain_assistants
- Add activity message handler for captain_assistants
- Update UI to show captain messages under the name of the assistant
- Fix the issue where openAI errors when image is sent
- Add support for custom name of the assistant
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
