Commit Graph

215 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Shivam Mishra
7651c18b48 feat: firecrawl branding api [UPM-15] (#13903)
Adds `WebsiteBrandingService` (OSS) with an Enterprise override using
Firecrawl v2 to extract branding and business data from a URL for
onboarding auto-fill.

OSS version uses HTTParty + Nokogiri to extract:
- Business name (og:site_name or title)
- Language (html lang)
- Favicon
- Social links from `<a>` tags

Enterprise version makes a single Firecrawl call to fetch:
- Structured JSON (name, language, industry via LLM)
- Branding (favicon, primary color)
- Page links

Falls back to OSS if Firecrawl is unavailable or fails.

Social handles (WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, TikTok, LINE)
are parsed deterministically via a shared `SocialLinkParser`.

> We use links for socials, since the LLM extraction was unreliable,
mostly returned empty, and hallucinated in some rare scenarios

## How to test

```ruby
# OSS (no Firecrawl key needed)
WebsiteBrandingService.new('chatwoot.com').perform

# Enterprise (requires CAPTAIN_FIRECRAWL_API_KEY)
WebsiteBrandingService.new('notion.so').perform
WebsiteBrandingService.new('postman.com').perform
```

Verify the returned hash includes business_name, language,
industry_category, social_handles, and branding with
favicon/primary_color.

<img width="908" height="393" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e3696887-d366-485a-89a0-8e1a9698a788"
/>
2026-03-30 11:32:03 +05:30
Tanmay Deep Sharma
04acc16609 fix: skip pay call if invoice already paid after finalize (#13924)
## Description

When a customer downgrades from Enterprise to Business, they may retain
unused Stripe credit balance. During an AI credits topup,
Stripe::Invoice.finalize_invoice auto-applies that credit balance to the
invoice. If the credit balance fully covers the invoice amount, Stripe
marks it as paid immediately upon finalization. Calling
Stripe::Invoice.pay on an already-paid invoice throws an error, breaking
the topup flow.
This fix retrieves the invoice status after finalization and skips the
pay call if Stripe has already settled it via credits.

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Tested against Stripe test mode with the following scenarios:

- Full credit balance payment: Customer has enough Stripe credit balance
to cover the entire invoice. Invoice is marked paid after
finalize_invoice — pay is correctly skipped. Credits are fulfilled
successfully.
- Partial credit balance payment: Customer has some Stripe credit
balance but not enough to cover the full amount. Invoice remains open
after finalization — pay is called and charges the remaining amount to
the default payment method. Credits are fulfilled successfully.
- Zero credit balance (normal payment): Customer has no Stripe credit
balance. Invoice remains open after finalization — pay charges the full
amount. Credits are fulfilled successfully.


## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-03-30 10:37:28 +05:30
Tanmay Deep Sharma
9efd554693 fix: resolve V2 capacity bypass in team assignment (#13904)
## Description

When Assignment V2 is enabled, the V2 capacity policies
(AgentCapacityPolicy / InboxCapacityLimit) are not respected during
team-based assignment paths. The system falls back to the legacy V1
max_assignment_limit, and since V1 is deprecated and typically
unconfigured in V2 setups, agents receive unlimited assignments
regardless of their V2 capacity.

Root cause: Inbox class directly defined
member_ids_with_assignment_capacity, which shadowed the
Enterprise::InboxAgentAvailability module override in Ruby's method
resolution order (MRO). This made the V2 capacity check unreachable
(dead code) for any code path using member_ids_with_assignment_capacity.

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

⏺ Before the fix
1. Enable assignment_v2 + advanced_assignment on account
2. Create AgentCapacityPolicy with InboxCapacityLimit = 1 for an inbox
3. Assign the policy to an agent (e.g., John)
4. Create 1 open conversation assigned to John (now at capacity)
5. Create a new unassigned conversation in the same inbox
6. Assign a team (containing John) to that conversation
7. Result: John gets assigned despite being at capacity
⏺ After the fix
Same steps 1–6.
7. Result: John is NOT assigned — conversation stays unassigned (no
agents with capacity available)


## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-03-27 15:38:17 +05:30
Vishnu Narayanan
4381be5f3e feat: disable helpcenter on hacker plans (#12068)
This change blocks Help Center access for default/Hacker-plan accounts
and closes the downgrade gap that could leave `help_center` enabled
after a subscription falls back to the default cloud plan.

Fixes: none
Closes: none

## Why

Default-plan accounts should not be able to access the Help Center, but
the downgrade fallback path only reset the plan name and did not
reconcile premium feature flags. That meant some accounts could keep
`help_center` enabled even after landing back on the Hacker/default
plan.

## What this change does

- blocks Help Center portal and article access for default/Hacker-plan
accounts
- reconciles premium feature flags when a subscription falls back to the
default cloud plan, so `help_center` is disabled immediately instead of
waiting for a later webhook
- preserves existing account `custom_attributes` during Stripe customer
recreation instead of overwriting them
- adds Enterprise coverage for the default-plan access checks on hosted
and custom-domain Help Center routes
- fixes the public access check to use the resolved portal object so
blocked requests return the intended response instead of raising an
error

## Validation

1. Create or use an account on the default/Hacker cloud plan with an
active portal.
2. Visit the portal home page and a published article on both the
Chatwoot-hosted URL and a configured custom domain.
3. Confirm the Help Center is blocked for that account.
4. Downgrade a paid account back to the default/Hacker plan through the
Stripe webhook flow.
5. Confirm `help_center` is disabled right after the downgrade fallback
is processed and the account can no longer access the Help Center.

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-03-26 23:48:46 -07:00
Sivin Varghese
4517c50227 feat: support bulk select and delete for documents (#13907) 2026-03-26 19:48:12 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
290dd3abf5 feat: allow captain to access contact attributes (#13850)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Captain v1 does not have access to contact attributes. Added a toggle to
let user choose if they want contact information available to Captain.

## Type of change

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

Specs and locally
<img width="1924" height="740" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-19 at 18 48 19@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/353cfeaa-cd58-40eb-89e7-d660a1dc1185"
/>

![Uploading CleanShot 2026-03-19 at 18.53.26@2x.png…]()


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-03-20 16:15:06 +05:30
Sojan Jose
270f3c6a80 fix: slim help center search results (#13761)
Fixes help center public article search so query responses stay compact
and locale-scoped. Whitespace-only queries are now treated as empty in
both the portal UI and the server-side search path, and search
suggestions stay aligned with the trimmed query.

Fixes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/10402
Closes: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/issues/10402

## Why

The public help center search endpoint reused the full article
serializer for query responses, which returned much more data than the
search suggestions UI needed. That made responses heavier than necessary
and also surfaced nested portal and category data that made the results
look cross-locale.

Whitespace-only searches could also still reach the backend search path,
and in Enterprise that meant embedding search could be invoked for a
blank query.

## What changed

- return a compact search-specific payload for article query responses
- keep the existing full article serializer for normal article listing
responses
- preserve current-locale search behavior for the portal search flow
- trim whitespace-only search terms on the client so they do not open
suggestions or trigger a request
- reuse the normalized query on the backend so whitespace-only requests
are treated as empty searches in both OSS and Enterprise paths
- pass the trimmed search term into suggestions so highlighting matches
the actual query being sent
- add request and frontend regression coverage for compact payloads,
locale scoping, and whitespace-only search behavior

## Validation

1. Open `/hc/:portal/:locale` in the public help center.
2. Enter only spaces in the search box and confirm suggestions do not
open.
3. Search for a real term and confirm suggestions appear.
4. Verify the results are limited to the active locale.
5. Click a suggestion and confirm it opens the correct article page.
6. Inspect the query response and confirm it returns the compact search
payload instead of the full article serializer.

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-03-17 00:46:23 -07:00
Aakash Bakhle
a90ffe6264 feat: Add force legacy auto-resolve flag (#13804)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Add account setting and store_accessor for
`captain_force_legacy_auto_resolve`.
Enterprise job now skips LLM evaluation when this flag is true and falls
back to legacy time-based resolution. Add spec to cover the fallback.


## Type of change

We recently rolled out Captain deciding if a conversation is resolved or
not. While it is an improvement for majority of customers, some still
prefer the old way of auto-resolving based on inactivity. This PR adds a
check.

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

legacy_auto_resolve = true

<img width="1282" height="848" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-13 at 19 55 55@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dfdcc5d5-6d21-462b-87a6-a5e1b1290a8b"
/>


legacy_auto_resolve = false
<img width="1268" height="864" alt="CleanShot 2026-03-13 at 20 00 50@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f4719ec6-922a-4c3b-bc45-7b29eaced565"
/>



## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-03-13 15:04:58 -07:00
Aakash Bakhle
8aa49f69d2 fix: prefer system API key for completion service (#13799)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Add an api_key override so internal conversation completions prefers
using the system API key and do not consume customer OpenAI credits.
## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

specs and locally

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-03-13 13:10:10 +05:30
Shivam Mishra
550b408656 fix: restrict existing user sign-in to account members (#13793)
SAML sign-in now only links an existing user when that user already
belongs to the account that initiated SSO. New users can still be
created for SAML-enabled accounts, and invited members can continue to
sign in through their IdP, but SAML will no longer auto-attach an
unrelated existing user record during login.

**What changed**
- Added an account-membership check before SAML reuses an existing user
by email.
- Kept first-time SAML user creation unchanged for valid new users.
- Added builder and request specs covering the allowed and rejected
login paths.
2026-03-13 12:22:25 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
d6d38cdd7d feat: captain decides if conversation should be resolved or kept open (#13336)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

captain decides if conversation should be resolved or open

Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/AI-91/make-captain-resolution-time-configurable

Update: Added 2 entries in reporting events:
`conversation_captain_handoff` and `conversation_captain_resolved`

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [x] This change requires a documentation update

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

LLM call decides that conversation is resolved, drops a private note
<img width="1228" height="438" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fb2cf1e9-4b2b-458b-a1e2-45c53d6a0158"
/>

LLM call decides conversation is still open as query was not resolved
<img width="1215" height="573" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d1d5322-f567-487e-954e-11ab0798d11c"
/>


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-03-13 10:03:58 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
87f5af4caa fix: playground captain v2 scenarios (#13747)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Playground now uses v2. It was only wired to use v1. Traces get `source:
playground` on langfuse when playground has been used.

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

locally and specs
<img width="1806" height="1276" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/41ef4eb3-52b1-4b8e-9a4f-e8510c90cb39"
/>


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-03-11 14:05:16 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
dbe35252bc fix: Use handoff_key for scenarios (#13755)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Ensure agent function names stay within OpenAI's 64-char limit
(ai-agents prepends "handoff_to_").

Add HANDOFF_TITLE_SLUG_MAX_LENGTH and
handoff_key generation: persisted records use `scenario_{id}_agent`; new
records use a truncated title slug.
Assistant scenario keys and agent_name now reference the generated
handoff key.

fixes :

`Invalid 'messages[9].tool_calls[0].function.name': string too long.
Expected a string with maximum length 64, but got a string with length
95 instead.`

## Type of change


- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

Tested locally
<img width="1806" height="1044" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/40cd7a3d-3d97-43a8-bd56-d3f5d63abbda"
/>

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
2026-03-11 14:01:25 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
dc0e5eb465 fix: optimize message query with account_id filter (#13759)
## Description

This PR optimizes message queries by explicitly filtering with
`account_id` so the database can use the existing indexes more
efficiently.

Changes:
- Add `account_id` to message query filters to improve index
utilization.
- Update `last_incoming_message` query to include `account_id`.
- Avoid unnecessary preloading of `contact_inboxes` where it is not
required.
- Update specs to ensure `account_id` is set correctly in
message-related tests.

These changes reduce query cost and improve performance for message
lookups, especially on large accounts.

---------

Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
2026-03-10 16:46:20 -07:00
Vinay Keerthi
059506b1db feat: Add automatic favicon fetching for companies (#13013)
## Summary

This Enterprise-only feature automatically fetches a favicon for
companies created with a domain, and adds a batch task to backfill
missing avatars for existing companies. The flow only targets companies
that do not already have an attached avatar, so existing avatars are
left untouched.


## Demo 



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d050334e-769f-4e46-b6e7-f7423727a192



## What changed

- Added `Avatar::AvatarFromFaviconJob` to build a Google favicon URL
from the company domain and fetch it through `Avatar::AvatarFromUrlJob`
- Triggered favicon fetching from `Company` with `after_create_commit`
- Added `Companies::FetchAvatarsJob` to batch existing companies that
are missing avatars
- Added `companies:fetch_missing_avatars` under `enterprise/lib/tasks`
- Kept the company-specific implementation inside the Enterprise
boundary
- Stubbed the new favicon request in unrelated specs that now hit this
callback indirectly
- Updated a couple of CI-sensitive specs that were failing due to
callback side effects / reload-safe exception assertions

## How to verify

1. Create a company in Enterprise with a valid domain and no avatar.
2. Confirm that a favicon-based avatar gets attached shortly after
creation.
3. Create another company with a domain and an avatar already attached.
4. Confirm that the existing avatar is not replaced.
5. Run `companies:fetch_missing_avatars`.
6. Confirm that existing companies without avatars get one, while
companies that already have avatars remain unchanged.

## Notes

- This change does not refresh or overwrite existing company avatars
- Favicon fetching only runs for companies with a present domain
- The branch includes the latest `develop`

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-03-05 18:51:28 -08:00
Aakash Bakhle
fd69b4c8f2 fix: captain json parsing (#13708)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
2026-03-05 15:43:21 +05:30
Sojan Jose
42a244369d feat(help-center): enable drag-and-drop category reordering (#13706) 2026-03-05 12:53:38 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
374d2258c7 fix: captain talking over support agent (#13673) 2026-03-03 16:13:34 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
c08fa631a9 feat: Add temporary account setting to disable Captain auto-resolve (#13680)
Add a temporary `captain_disable_auto_resolve` boolean setting on
accounts to prevent Captain from resolving conversations. Guards both
the scheduled resolution job and the assistant's resolve tool.

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-27 09:37:00 -08:00
Shivam Mishra
df92fd12cb fix: bot handoff should set waiting time (#13417)
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-02-27 15:31:49 +05:30
Shivam Mishra
7c60ad9e28 feat: include contact verified status with each tool call (#13663)
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
2026-02-26 16:16:33 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
efe49f7da4 fix: captain liquid render file system (#13647) 2026-02-25 20:19:34 +05:30
Shivam Mishra
b98c614669 feat: add campaign context to Captain v2 prompts (#13644)
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-25 18:33:37 +05:30
Sojan Jose
55f6257313 chore(hub): clean up legacy Captain hub flow (#13640)
## Summary
This PR cleans up legacy Hub/Captain integration paths and simplifies
hub URL behavior coverage in tests.

## Changes
- remove legacy Captain account endpoint flow from `ChatwootHub`
- remove obsolete spec coverage tied to that retired flow
- keep hub URL handling centralized in `base_url` with enterprise
overlay precedence
- simplify hub URL specs to assert explicit static URL expectations
where applicable

## Reproduce
Run the focused hub specs from this branch:
- `bundle exec rspec spec/lib/chatwoot_hub_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/lib/chatwoot_hub_spec.rb`

## Testing
Validated locally with:
- `bundle exec rspec spec/lib/chatwoot_hub_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/lib/chatwoot_hub_spec.rb`
- `bundle exec rubocop lib/chatwoot_hub.rb spec/lib/chatwoot_hub_spec.rb
enterprise/lib/enterprise/chatwoot_hub.rb
spec/enterprise/lib/chatwoot_hub_spec.rb`
2026-02-24 20:29:53 -08:00
Aakash Bakhle
7cec4ebaae feat: support multimodal user messages in captain v2 (#13581)
Extract and pass image attachments from the latest user message to the
runner,
excluding the last user message from the context for processing.

Fixes #13588 

# Pull Request Template

## Description

Adds image support to captain v2

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

specs and local testing

<img width="754" height="1008" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/914cbc2c-9d30-42d0-87d4-9e5430845c87"
/>

langfuse also shows media correctly with the instrumentation code:
<img width="1800" height="1260" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ce0f5fa6-b1a5-42ec-a213-9a82b1751037"
/>


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-24 19:37:41 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
9dd13b9a2b fix: topup checkout flaky test (#13616) 2026-02-23 14:54:52 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
d8f4bb940e feat: add resolve_conversation tool for Captain V2 scenarios (#13597)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Adds a new built-in tool that allows Captain scenarios to resolve
conversations programmatically. This enables automated workflows like
the misdirected contact deflector to close conversations after handling
them, while still allowing human review via label filtering.


## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

tested by mentioning it to be used in captain v2 scenario

<img width="1180" height="828" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e70baf96-0c70-407e-af2c-328500ac5434"
/>



## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Tanmay Deep Sharma <32020192+tds-1@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-20 19:08:36 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
db7e02b93b feat: captain channel type langfuse metadata (#13574)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Adds channel type to Captain assistant traces in Langfuse

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

<img width="906" height="672" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/224cee95-56aa-4672-8f74-0c0052251db9"
/>

<img width="908" height="611" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ddd8ef0d-47c1-450c-a09f-27e82a34d04d"
/>


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-20 12:16:43 +05:30
Sojan Jose
2ab117e8eb feat(cloud-billing): cancel subscriptions at period end on deletion mark (#13580)
## How to reproduce
In Chatwoot Cloud, mark an account for deletion from account settings
while the account has an active Stripe subscription. Before this change,
deletion marking did not explicitly mark subscriptions to stop renewing
at period end.

## What changed
This PR adds `Enterprise::Billing::CancelCloudSubscriptionsService` and
calls it from the delete action path in
`Enterprise::Api::V1::AccountsController`. The service lists only active
Stripe subscriptions for the customer and sets `cancel_at_period_end:
true` when needed. The account deletion schedule remains unchanged
(existing static 7-day behavior), and Stripe deleted-event fallback
behavior remains unchanged.

## How this was tested
Added and updated specs:
-
`spec/enterprise/services/enterprise/billing/cancel_cloud_subscriptions_service_spec.rb`
-
`spec/enterprise/controllers/enterprise/api/v1/accounts_controller_spec.rb`

Executed:
- `bundle exec rspec
spec/enterprise/services/enterprise/billing/cancel_cloud_subscriptions_service_spec.rb`
- `bundle exec rspec
spec/enterprise/controllers/enterprise/api/v1/accounts_controller_spec.rb:363`
2026-02-19 11:40:06 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
138840a23f fix: typo in metadata key in captain v2 (#13558)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

## Type of change

typo fix

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
2026-02-17 15:40:50 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
3874383698 feat: insrument captain v2 (#13439)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Instruments captain v2

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

Local testing:
<img width="864" height="510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/855ebce5-e8b8-4d22-b0bb-0d413769a6ab"
/>



## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
2026-02-17 13:28:26 +05:30
Sojan Jose
61eaa098ae fix(messages): reduce audio transcription 400 retry noise (#13487)
## Summary
This PR reduces duplicate failure noise for audio transcription jobs
that fail with permanent HTTP 400 responses, and fixes a file-format
edge case causing intermittent 400s.

Sentry issue: [CHATWOOT-99E /
6660541334](https://chatwoot-p3.sentry.io/issues/6660541334/)

## Confirmed root cause
For some attachments, the stored filename had no extension (example:
`speech`, content type `audio/mpeg`).
When the temporary transcription upload file was created without an
extension, OpenAI returned:
`Unrecognized file format` (HTTP 400).

## Scope of changes
1. `Messages::AudioTranscriptionJob`
- Keeps `discard_on Faraday::BadRequestError` to avoid retry storms on
permanent request errors.
- Adds explicit Rails warning logs for discarded jobs with
attachment/job/status context.

2. `Messages::AudioTranscriptionService`
- Keeps guaranteed temp file cleanup via `ensure`.
- Ensures temp upload files include an extension when the original
filename has none, derived from blob `content_type`.
- This addresses intermittent failures like extensionless `audio/mpeg`
files.

## Reproduction
Enable audio transcription for an account and process an audio
attachment whose stored filename has no extension (for example `speech`)
but valid audio content type (`audio/mpeg`).
Before this fix, OpenAI transcription could return HTTP 400
`Unrecognized file format` for that attachment while similar attachments
with extensions succeeded.

## Testing
Ran:
`bundle exec rubocop
enterprise/app/jobs/messages/audio_transcription_job.rb
enterprise/app/services/messages/audio_transcription_service.rb`

Result: both modified files pass lint with no offenses.
2026-02-17 13:25:13 +05:30
Shivam Mishra
2c2f0547f7 fix: Captain not responding to campaign conversations (#13489)
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-12 10:07:56 +05:30
Tanmay Deep Sharma
7b512bd00e fix: V2 Assignment service enhancements (#13036)
## Linear Ticket:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6081/review-feedback

## Description

Assignment V2 Service Enhancements

- Enable Assignment V2 on plan upgrade
- Fix UI issue with fair distribution policy display
- Add advanced assignment feature flag and enhance Assignment V2
capabilities

## Type of change

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

This has been tested using the UI.

## Checklist:

- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---

> [!NOTE]
> **Medium Risk**
> Changes auto-assignment execution paths, rate limiting defaults, and
feature-flag gating (including premium plan behavior), which could
affect which conversations get assigned and when. UI rewires inbox
settings and policy flows, so regressions are possible around
navigation/linking and feature visibility.
> 
> **Overview**
> **Adds a new premium `advanced_assignment` feature flag** and uses it
to gate capacity/balanced assignment features in the UI (sidebar entry,
settings routes, assignment-policy landing cards) and backend
(Enterprise balanced selector + capacity filtering).
`advanced_assignment` is marked premium, included in Business plan
entitlements, and auto-synced in Enterprise accounts when
`assignment_v2` is toggled.
> 
> **Improves Assignment V2 policy UX** by adding an inbox-level
“Conversation Assignment” section (behind `assignment_v2`) that can
link/unlink an assignment policy, navigate to create/edit policy flows
with `inboxId` query context, and show an inbox-link prompt after
creating a policy. The policy form now defaults to enabled, disables the
`balanced` option with a premium badge/message when unavailable, and
inbox lists support click-to-navigate.
> 
> **Tightens/adjusts auto-assignment behavior**: bulk assignment now
requires `inbox.enable_auto_assignment?`, conversation ordering uses the
attached `assignment_policy` priority, and rate limiting uses
`assignment_policy` config with an infinite default limit while still
tracking assignments. Tests and i18n strings are updated accordingly.
> 
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
23bc03bf75ee4376071e4d7fc7cd564c601d33d7. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
2026-02-11 12:24:45 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
6e397c7571 fix: default model for captain assistant (#13496) 2026-02-10 14:53:53 +05:30
Pranav
e9e6de5690 fix: Increase the parallelism config to fix flaky tests, revert bad commits (#13410)
The specs break only in Circle CI, we have to figure out the root cause
for the same. At the moment, I have increased the parallelism to fix
this.
2026-01-30 12:49:31 -08:00
Pranav
5ec77aca64 feat: Add first response time distribution report endpoint (#13400)
The index is already added in production.

Adds a new reporting API that returns conversation counts grouped by
channel type and first response time buckets (0-1h, 1-4h, 4-8h, 8-24h,
24h+).

- GET /api/v2/accounts/:id/reports/first_response_time_distribution
- Uses SQL aggregation to handle large datasets efficiently
- Adds composite index on reporting_events for query performance

Tested on production workload.
Request: GET
`/api/v2/accounts/1/reports/first_response_time_distribution?since=<since>&until=<until>`
Response payload:
```
{
    "Channel::WebWidget": {
      "0-1h": 120,
      "1-4h": 85,
      "4-8h": 32,
      "8-24h": 12,
      "24h+": 3
    },
    "Channel::Email": {
      "0-1h": 12,
      "1-4h": 28,
      "4-8h": 45,
      "8-24h": 35,
      "24h+": 10
    },
    "Channel::FacebookPage": {
      "0-1h": 50,
      "1-4h": 30,
      "4-8h": 15,
      "8-24h": 8,
      "24h+": 2
    }
  }
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
2026-01-30 22:22:27 +04:00
Aakash Bakhle
77493c5d0f fix: captain assistant image comprehension (#13390)
# Pull Request Template

## Description

Fixes # (issue)

When we migrated to RubyLLM, images weren't being sent properly in
RubyLLM format to the model, so it did not understand images.

## Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

## How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.

specs + local testing

Current behaviour on staging:
<img width="772" height="1012" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7b7d360f-dea4-48af-b20b-ee4c98a38a85"
/>

local testing with fix:
<img width="792" height="1216" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5ef82452-015e-4bda-a68f-884d00acb014"
/>


## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules

---------

Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
2026-01-28 16:07:13 -08:00
Muhsin Keloth
04b2901e1f feat: Conversation workflows(EE) (#13040)
We are expanding Chatwoot’s automation capabilities by
introducing **Conversation Workflows**, a dedicated section in settings
where teams can configure rules that govern how conversations are closed
and what information agents must fill before resolving. This feature
helps teams enforce data consistency, collect structured resolution
information, and ensure downstream reporting is accurate.

Instead of having auto‑resolution buried inside Account Settings, we
introduced a new sidebar item:
- Auto‑resolve conversations (existing behaviour)
- Required attributes on resolution (new)

This groups all conversation‑closing logic into a single place.

#### Required Attributes on Resolve

Admins can now pick which custom conversation attributes must be filled
before an agent can resolve a conversation.

**How it works**

- Admin selects one or more attributes from the list of existing
conversation level custom attributes.
- These selected attributes become mandatory during resolution.
- List all the attributes configured via Required Attributes (Text,
Number, Link, Date, List, Checkbox)
- When an agent clicks Resolve Conversation:
If attributes already have values → the conversation resolves normally.
If attributes are missing → a modal appears prompting the agent to fill
them.

<img width="1554" height="1282" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 42
23@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4cd5d6e1-abe8-4999-accd-d4a08913b373"
/>


#### Custom Attributes Integration

On the Custom Attributes page, we will surfaced indicators showing how
each attribute is being used.

Each attribute will show badges such as:

- Resolution → used in the required‑on‑resolve workflow

- Pre‑chat form → already existing

<img width="2390" height="1822" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 43
42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b92a6eb7-7f6c-40e6-bf23-6a5310f2d9c5"
/>


#### Admin Flow

- Navigate to Settings → Conversation Workflows.
- Under Required attributes on resolve, click Add Required Attribute.
- Pick from the dropdown list of conversation attributes.
- Save changes.

Agents will now be prompted automatically whenever they resolve.

<img width="2434" height="872" alt="CleanShot 2025-12-10 at 11 44 42@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/632fc0e5-767c-4a1c-8cf4-ffe3d058d319"
/>



#### NOTES
- The Required Attributes on Resolve modal should only appear when
values are missing.
- Required attributes must block the resolution action until satisfied.
- Bulk‑resolve actions should follow the same rules — any conversation
missing attributes cannot be bulk‑resolved, rest will be resolved, show
a notification that the resolution cannot be done.
- API resolution does not respect the attributes.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
2026-01-27 11:36:20 +04:00
Shivam Mishra
6a482926b4 feat: new Captain Editor (#13235)
Co-authored-by: Aakash Bakhle <48802744+aakashb95@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakashbakhle@gmail.com>
2026-01-21 13:39:07 +05:30
Pranav
b2ffad1998 fix: Validate status and priority params in search conversations tool (#13295)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-19 14:08:32 +05:30
Pranav
a8b302d4cd feat(ee): Review Notes for CSAT Reports (#13289)
CSAT scores are helpful, but on their own they rarely tell the full
story. A drop in rating can come from delayed timelines, unclear
expectations, or simple misunderstandings, even when the issue itself
was handled correctly.

Review Notes for CSAT let admins/report manager roles add internal-only
context next to each CSAT response. This makes it easier to interpret
scores properly and focus on patterns and root causes, not just numbers.


<img width="2170" height="1680" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56df7fab-d0a7-4a94-95b9-e4c459ad33d5"
/>


### Why this matters

* Capture the real context behind individual CSAT ratings
* Clarify whether a low score points to a genuine service issue or a
process gap
* Spot recurring themes across conversations and teams
* Make CSAT reviews more useful for leadership reviews and
retrospectives

### How Review Notes work

**View CSAT responses**
Open the CSAT report to see overall metrics, rating distribution, and
individual responses.

**Add a Review Note**
For any CSAT entry, managers can add a Review Note directly below the
customer’s feedback.

**Document internal insights**
Use Review Notes to capture things like:

* Why a score was lower or higher than expected
* Patterns you are seeing across similar cases
* Observations around communication, timelines, or customer expectations

Review Notes are visible only to administrators and people with report
access only. We may expand visibility to agents in the future based on
feedback. However, customers never see them.

Each note clearly shows who added it and when, making it easy to review
context and changes over time.
2026-01-15 19:53:57 -08:00
Shivam Mishra
b099d3a1eb fix: PDF errors not loading in CI (#13236) 2026-01-12 15:22:15 +05:30
Vinay Keerthi
005a22fd69 feat: Add sorting by contacts count to companies list (#13012)
## Description

Adds the ability to sort companies by the number of contacts they have
(contacts_count) in ascending or descending order. This is part of the
Chatwoot 5.0 release requirements for the companies feature.

The implementation uses a scope-based approach consistent with other
sorting implementations in the codebase (e.g., contacts sorting by
last_activity_at).

## Type of change

- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

## Available Sorting Options

After this change, the Companies API supports the following sorting
options:

| Sort Field | Type | Ascending | Descending |
|------------|------|-----------|------------|
| `name` | string | `?sort=name` | `?sort=-name` |
| `domain` | string | `?sort=domain` | `?sort=-domain` |
| `created_at` | datetime | `?sort=created_at` | `?sort=-created_at` |
| `contacts_count` | integer (scope) | `?sort=contacts_count` |
`?sort=-contacts_count` |

**Note:** Prefix with `-` for descending order. Companies with NULL
contacts_count will appear last (NULLS LAST).

## CURL Examples

**Sort by contacts count (ascending):**
```bash
curl -X GET 'https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/companies?sort=contacts_count' \
  -H 'api_access_token: YOUR_API_TOKEN'
```

**Sort by contacts count (descending):**
```bash
curl -X GET 'https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/companies?sort=-contacts_count' \
  -H 'api_access_token: YOUR_API_TOKEN'
```

**Sort by name (ascending):**
```bash
curl -X GET 'https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/companies?sort=name' \
  -H 'api_access_token: YOUR_API_TOKEN'
```

**Sort by created_at (descending):**
```bash
curl -X GET 'https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/companies?sort=-created_at' \
  -H 'api_access_token: YOUR_API_TOKEN'
```

**With pagination:**
```bash
curl -X GET 'https://app.chatwoot.com/api/v1/accounts/{account_id}/companies?sort=-contacts_count&page=2' \
  -H 'api_access_token: YOUR_API_TOKEN'
```

## How Has This Been Tested?

- Added RSpec tests for both ascending and descending sort
- All 24 existing specs pass
- Manually tested the sorting functionality with test data

**Test configuration:**
- Ruby 3.4.4
- Rails 7.1.5.2
- PostgreSQL (test database)

**To reproduce:**
1. Run `bundle exec rspec
spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb`
2. All tests should pass (24 examples, 0 failures)

## Checklist:

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

## Technical Details

**Backend changes:**
- Controller: Added `sort_on :contacts_count` with scope-based sorting
- Model: Added `order_on_contacts_count` scope using
`Arel::Nodes::SqlLiteral` and `sanitize_sql_for_order` with `NULLS LAST`
for consistent NULL handling
- Specs: Added 2 new tests for ascending/descending sort validation

**Files changed:**
- `enterprise/app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller.rb`
- `enterprise/app/models/company.rb`
-
`spec/enterprise/controllers/api/v1/accounts/companies_controller_spec.rb`

**Note:** This PR only includes the backend implementation. Frontend
changes (sort menu UI + i18n) will follow in a separate commit.

---------

Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
2026-01-09 15:20:08 -08:00
Aakash Bakhle
dcc72ee63c fix: consistent instrumentation with conversation.display_id (#13194) 2026-01-08 12:27:44 +05:30
Shivam Mishra
566de02385 feat: allow agent bot and captain responses to reset waiting since (#13181)
When AgentBot responds to customer messages, the `waiting_since`
timestamp is not reset, causing inflated reply time metrics when a human
agent eventually responds. This results in inaccurate reporting that
incorrectly includes periods when customers were satisfied with bot
responses.

### Timeline from Production Data

```
Dec 12, 16:20:14 - Customer sends message (ID: 368451924)
                   ↓ waiting_since = Dec 12, 16:20:14

Dec 12, 16:20:17 - AgentBot replies (ID: 368451960)
                   ↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 
                   ↓ (Bot response doesn't clear it)

14-day gap        - Customer satisfied, no messages
                   ↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 

Dec 26, 22:25:45 - Customer sends new message (ID: 383522275)
                   ↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 
                   ↓ (New message doesn't reset it)

Dec 26-27         - More AgentBot interactions
                   ↓ waiting_since STILL = Dec 12, 16:20:14 

Dec 27, 07:36:53 - Human agent finally replies (ID: 383799517)
                   ↓ Reply time calculated: 1,268,404 seconds
                   ↓ = 14.7 DAYS 
```
## Root Cause

The core issues is in `app/models/message.rb`, where **AgentBot messages
does not clear `waiting_since`** - The `human_response?` method only
returns true for `User` senders, so bot replies never trigger the
clearing logic. This means once `waiting_since` is set, it stays set
even when customers send new messages after receiving bot responses.

The solution is to simply reset `waiting_since` **after a bot has
responded**. This ensures reply time metrics reflect actual human agent
response times, not bot-handled periods.

### What triggers the rest

This is an intentional "gotcha", that only `AgentBot` and
`Captain::Assistant` messages trigger the waiting time reset. Automation
and campaign messages maintain current behavior (no reset). This is
because interactive bot assistants provide conversational help that
might satisfy customers. Automation and campaigns are one-way
communications and shouldn't affect waiting time calculations.

## Related Work

Extends PR #11787 which fixed `waiting_since` clearing on conversation
resolution. This PR addresses the bot interaction scenario which was not
covered by that fix.

Scripts to clean data:
https://gist.github.com/scmmishra/bd133208e219d0ab52fbfdf03036c48a
2026-01-07 13:57:43 +05:30
Sojan Jose
d2ba9a2ad3 feat(enterprise): add voice conference API (#13064)
The backend APIs for the voice call channel 
ref: #11602
2025-12-15 15:11:59 -08:00
Aakash Bakhle
3fce56c98f fix: captain template message conflict (#13048)
Co-authored-by: aakashb95 <aakash@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Shivam Mishra <scm.mymail@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
2025-12-15 15:47:26 +05:30
Aakash Bakhle
1de8d3e56d feat: legacy features to ruby llm (#12994) 2025-12-11 14:17:28 +05:30
Shivam Mishra
0d8e249fe4 feat: include chatwoot metadata with each tool call (#12907) 2025-12-10 15:25:18 +05:30