# Pull Request Template
## Description
CJK language users (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, etc.) use IME where Enter
confirms character selection. AI input components were intercepting
Enter unconditionally, making them unusable for IME users.
Add `event.isComposing` check to CopilotEditor, CopilotInput, and
AssistantPlayground so Enter during active IME composition is ignored.
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
Before:
Add a Japenese keyboard, then go to AI follow-ups, type some word,
selecting it with enter submits the follow up. So CJK users cannot use
follow-ups.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/53517432-d97b-47fc-a802-81675e31d5c9
After:
Type a word, press enter to choose it, press enter again to unselect it
and enter again to send
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6c2a420b-7ee6-4c71-82a6-d9f1d7bbf31a
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Playground now uses v2. It was only wired to use v1. Traces get `source:
playground` on langfuse when playground has been used.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally and specs
<img width="1806" height="1276" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/41ef4eb3-52b1-4b8e-9a4f-e8510c90cb39"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR includes an update to the Captain navigation structure.
## Route Structure
```javascript
1. captain_assistants_responses_index → /captain/:assistantId/faqs
2. captain_assistants_documents_index → /captain/:assistantId/documents
3. captain_assistants_scenarios_index → /captain/:assistantId/scenarios
4. captain_assistants_playground_index → /captain/:assistantId/playground
5. captain_assistants_inboxes_index → /captain/:assistantId/inboxes
6. captain_tools_index → /captain/tools
7. captain_assistants_settings_index → /captain/:assistantId/settings
8. captain_assistants_guardrails_index → /captain/:assistantId/settings/guardrails
9. captain_assistants_guidelines_index → /captain/:assistantId/settings/guidelines
10. captain_assistants_index → /captain/:navigationPath
```
**How it works:**
1. User clicks sidebar item → Routes to `captain_assistants_index` with
`navigationPath`
2. `AssistantsIndexPage` validates route and gets last active assistant,
if not redirects to assistant create page.
3. Routes to actual page: `/captain/:assistantId/:page`
4. Page loads with correct assistant context
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-5832/updating-captain-navigation
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
