feat: Use vitest instead of jest, run all the specs anywhere in app/ folder in the CI (#9722)
Due to the pattern `**/specs/*.spec.js` defined in CircleCI, none of the frontend spec in the folders such as `specs/<domain-name>/getters.spec.js` were not executed in Circle CI. This PR fixes the issue, along with the following changes: - Use vitest instead of jest - Remove jest dependancies - Update tests to work with vitest --------- Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -8,26 +8,26 @@ import {
|
||||
} from 'dashboard/helper/routeHelpers';
|
||||
import ReconnectService from 'dashboard/helper/ReconnectService';
|
||||
|
||||
jest.mock('shared/helpers/mitt', () => ({
|
||||
vi.mock('shared/helpers/mitt', () => ({
|
||||
emitter: {
|
||||
on: jest.fn(),
|
||||
off: jest.fn(),
|
||||
emit: jest.fn(),
|
||||
on: vi.fn(),
|
||||
off: vi.fn(),
|
||||
emit: vi.fn(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
jest.mock('date-fns', () => ({
|
||||
differenceInSeconds: jest.fn(),
|
||||
vi.mock('date-fns', () => ({
|
||||
differenceInSeconds: vi.fn(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
jest.mock('dashboard/helper/routeHelpers', () => ({
|
||||
isAConversationRoute: jest.fn(),
|
||||
isAInboxViewRoute: jest.fn(),
|
||||
isNotificationRoute: jest.fn(),
|
||||
vi.mock('dashboard/helper/routeHelpers', () => ({
|
||||
isAConversationRoute: vi.fn(),
|
||||
isAInboxViewRoute: vi.fn(),
|
||||
isNotificationRoute: vi.fn(),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
const storeMock = {
|
||||
dispatch: jest.fn(),
|
||||
dispatch: vi.fn(),
|
||||
getters: {
|
||||
getAppliedConversationFiltersQuery: [],
|
||||
'customViews/getActiveConversationFolder': { query: {} },
|
||||
@@ -46,17 +46,17 @@ describe('ReconnectService', () => {
|
||||
let reconnectService;
|
||||
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
window.addEventListener = jest.fn();
|
||||
window.removeEventListener = jest.fn();
|
||||
window.addEventListener = vi.fn();
|
||||
window.removeEventListener = vi.fn();
|
||||
Object.defineProperty(window, 'location', {
|
||||
configurable: true,
|
||||
value: { reload: jest.fn() },
|
||||
value: { reload: vi.fn() },
|
||||
});
|
||||
reconnectService = new ReconnectService(storeMock, routerMock);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
afterEach(() => {
|
||||
jest.clearAllMocks();
|
||||
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe('constructor', () => {
|
||||
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ describe('ReconnectService', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
describe('handleOnlineEvent', () => {
|
||||
it('should reload the page if disconnected for more than 3 hours', () => {
|
||||
reconnectService.getSecondsSinceDisconnect = jest
|
||||
reconnectService.getSecondsSinceDisconnect = vi
|
||||
.fn()
|
||||
.mockReturnValue(10801);
|
||||
reconnectService.handleOnlineEvent();
|
||||
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ describe('ReconnectService', () => {
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should not reload the page if disconnected for less than 3 hours', () => {
|
||||
reconnectService.getSecondsSinceDisconnect = jest
|
||||
reconnectService.getSecondsSinceDisconnect = vi
|
||||
.fn()
|
||||
.mockReturnValue(10799);
|
||||
reconnectService.handleOnlineEvent();
|
||||
@@ -129,9 +129,7 @@ describe('ReconnectService', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
describe('fetchConversations', () => {
|
||||
it('should dispatch updateChatListFilters and fetchAllConversations', async () => {
|
||||
reconnectService.getSecondsSinceDisconnect = jest
|
||||
.fn()
|
||||
.mockReturnValue(100);
|
||||
reconnectService.getSecondsSinceDisconnect = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(100);
|
||||
await reconnectService.fetchConversations();
|
||||
expect(storeMock.dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('updateChatListFilters', {
|
||||
page: null,
|
||||
@@ -141,9 +139,7 @@ describe('ReconnectService', () => {
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should dispatch updateChatListFilters and reset updatedWithin', async () => {
|
||||
reconnectService.getSecondsSinceDisconnect = jest
|
||||
.fn()
|
||||
.mockReturnValue(100);
|
||||
reconnectService.getSecondsSinceDisconnect = vi.fn().mockReturnValue(100);
|
||||
await reconnectService.fetchConversations();
|
||||
expect(storeMock.dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('updateChatListFilters', {
|
||||
updatedWithin: null,
|
||||
@@ -173,7 +169,7 @@ describe('ReconnectService', () => {
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
};
|
||||
const spy = jest.spyOn(
|
||||
const spy = vi.spyOn(
|
||||
reconnectService,
|
||||
'fetchFilteredOrSavedConversations'
|
||||
);
|
||||
@@ -191,7 +187,7 @@ describe('ReconnectService', () => {
|
||||
query: null,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const spy = jest.spyOn(reconnectService, 'fetchConversations');
|
||||
const spy = vi.spyOn(reconnectService, 'fetchConversations');
|
||||
|
||||
await reconnectService.fetchConversationsOnReconnect();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -204,7 +200,7 @@ describe('ReconnectService', () => {
|
||||
query: { test: 'activeFolderQuery' },
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const spy = jest.spyOn(
|
||||
const spy = vi.spyOn(
|
||||
reconnectService,
|
||||
'fetchFilteredOrSavedConversations'
|
||||
);
|
||||
@@ -270,11 +266,11 @@ describe('ReconnectService', () => {
|
||||
describe('handleRouteSpecificFetch', () => {
|
||||
it('should fetch conversations and messages if current route is a conversation route', async () => {
|
||||
isAConversationRoute.mockReturnValue(true);
|
||||
const spyConversations = jest.spyOn(
|
||||
const spyConversations = vi.spyOn(
|
||||
reconnectService,
|
||||
'fetchConversationsOnReconnect'
|
||||
);
|
||||
const spyMessages = jest.spyOn(
|
||||
const spyMessages = vi.spyOn(
|
||||
reconnectService,
|
||||
'fetchConversationMessagesOnReconnect'
|
||||
);
|
||||
@@ -285,14 +281,14 @@ describe('ReconnectService', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
it('should fetch notifications if current route is an inbox view route', async () => {
|
||||
isAInboxViewRoute.mockReturnValue(true);
|
||||
const spy = jest.spyOn(reconnectService, 'fetchNotificationsOnReconnect');
|
||||
const spy = vi.spyOn(reconnectService, 'fetchNotificationsOnReconnect');
|
||||
await reconnectService.handleRouteSpecificFetch();
|
||||
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should fetch notifications if current route is a notification route', async () => {
|
||||
isNotificationRoute.mockReturnValue(true);
|
||||
const spy = jest.spyOn(reconnectService, 'fetchNotificationsOnReconnect');
|
||||
const spy = vi.spyOn(reconnectService, 'fetchNotificationsOnReconnect');
|
||||
await reconnectService.handleRouteSpecificFetch();
|
||||
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -320,7 +316,7 @@ describe('ReconnectService', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
describe('onDisconnect', () => {
|
||||
it('should set disconnectTime and call setConversationLastMessageId', () => {
|
||||
reconnectService.setConversationLastMessageId = jest.fn();
|
||||
reconnectService.setConversationLastMessageId = vi.fn();
|
||||
reconnectService.onDisconnect();
|
||||
expect(reconnectService.disconnectTime).toBeInstanceOf(Date);
|
||||
expect(reconnectService.setConversationLastMessageId).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
@@ -329,8 +325,8 @@ describe('ReconnectService', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
describe('onReconnect', () => {
|
||||
it('should handle route-specific fetch, revalidate caches, and emit WEBSOCKET_RECONNECT_COMPLETED event', async () => {
|
||||
reconnectService.handleRouteSpecificFetch = jest.fn();
|
||||
reconnectService.revalidateCaches = jest.fn();
|
||||
reconnectService.handleRouteSpecificFetch = vi.fn();
|
||||
reconnectService.revalidateCaches = vi.fn();
|
||||
await reconnectService.onReconnect();
|
||||
expect(reconnectService.handleRouteSpecificFetch).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
expect(reconnectService.revalidateCaches).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user