feat: sign webhooks for API channel and agentbots (#13892)
Account webhooks sign outgoing payloads with HMAC-SHA256, but agent bot and API inbox webhooks were delivered unsigned. This PR adds the same signing to both. Each model gets a dedicated `secret` column rather than reusing the agent bot's `access_token` (for API auth back into Chatwoot) or the API inbox's `hmac_token` (for inbound contact identity verification). These serve different trust boundaries and shouldn't be coupled — rotating a signing secret shouldn't invalidate API access or contact verification. The existing `Webhooks::Trigger` already signs when a secret is present, so the backend change is just passing `secret:` through to the jobs. Shared token logic is extracted into a `WebhookSecretable` concern included by `Webhook`, `AgentBot`, and `Channel::Api`. The frontend reuses the existing `AccessToken` component for secret display. Secrets are admin-only and excluded from enterprise audit logs. ### How to test Point an agent bot or API inbox webhook URL at a request inspector. Send a message and verify `X-Chatwoot-Signature` and `X-Chatwoot-Timestamp` headers are present. Reset the secret from settings and confirm subsequent deliveries use the new value. --------- Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ class Api::V1::Accounts::AgentBotsController < Api::V1::Accounts::BaseController
|
||||
@agent_bot.reload
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def reset_secret
|
||||
@agent_bot.reset_secret!
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
private
|
||||
|
||||
def agent_bot
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ class Api::V1::Accounts::InboxesController < Api::V1::Accounts::BaseController
|
||||
head :ok
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def reset_secret
|
||||
return head :not_found unless @inbox.api?
|
||||
|
||||
@inbox.channel.reset_secret!
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
def destroy
|
||||
::DeleteObjectJob.perform_later(@inbox, Current.user, request.ip) if @inbox.present?
|
||||
render status: :ok, json: { message: I18n.t('messages.inbox_deletetion_response') }
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user